期刊文献+

Clinical outcome and predictors of survival after TIPS insertion in patients with liver cirrhosis 被引量:17

Clinical outcome and predictors of survival after TIPS insertion in patients with liver cirrhosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To determine the clinical outcome and predictors of survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) implantation in cirrhotic patients. METHODS:Eighty-one patients with liver cirrhosis and consequential portal hypertension had TIPS implantation (bare metal) for either refractory ascites (RA) (n= 27) or variceal bleeding (VB) (n = 54). Endpoints for the study were:technical success, stent occlusion and stent stenosis, rebleeding, RA and mortality. Clinical records of patients were collected and analysed. Baseline characteristics [e.g., age, sex, CHILD score and the model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD score), underlying disease] were retrieved. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate survival from the time of TIPS implantation and comparisons were made by log rank test. A multivariate analysis of factors influencing survival was carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results were expressed as medians and ranges. Comparisons between groups were performed by using the Mann-Whitney Utest and the χ 2 test as appropriate. RESULTS:No difference could be seen in terms of age, sex, underlying disease or degree of portal pressure gradient (PPG) reduction between the ascites and the bleeding group. The PPG significantly decreased from 23.4 ± 5.3 mmHg (VB) vs 22.1 ± 5.5 mmHg (RA) before TIPS to 11.8 ± 4.0 vs 11.7 ± 4.2 after TIPS implantation (P = 0.001 within each group). There was a tendency towards more patients with stage CHILD A in the bleeding group compared to the ascites group (24 vs 6, P = 0.052). The median survival for the ascites group was 29 mo compared to > 60 mo for the bleeding group (P = 0.009). The number of radiological controls for stent patency was 6.3 for bleeders and 3.8 for ascites patients (P = 0.029). Kaplan-Meier calculation indicated that stent occlusion at first control (P = 0.027), ascites prior to TIPS implantation (P = 0.009), CHILD stage (P = 0.013), MELD score (P = 0.001) and those patients not having undergone liver transplantation (P = 0.024) were significant predictors of survival. In the Cox regression model, stent occlusion (P = 0.022), RA (P = 0.043), CHILD stage (P = 0.015) and MELD score (P = 0.004) turned out to be independent prognostic factors of survival. The anticoagulation management (P = 0.097), the porto-systemic pressure gradient (P= 0.460) and rebleeding episodes (P = 0.765) had no significant effect on the overall survival. CONCLUSION:RA, stent occlusion, initial CHILD stage and MELD score are independent predictors of survival in patients with TIPS, speaking for a close follow-up in these circumstances. AIM: To determine the clinical outcome and predictors of survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) implantation in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with liver cirrhosis and consequential portal hypertension had TIPS implanta- tion (bare metal) for either refractory ascites (RA) (n = 27) or variceal bleeding (VB) (n = 54). Endpoints for the study were: technical success, stent occlusion and stent stenosis, rebleeding, RA and mortality. Clini- cal records of patients were collected and analysed. Baseline characteristics [e.g., age, sex, CHILD score and the model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD score), underlying disease] were retrieved. The Kaplan- Meier method was employed to calculate survival from the time of TIPS implantation and comparisons were made by log rank test. A multivariate analysis of factors influencing survival was carried out using the Cox pro- portional hazards regression model. Results were ex- pressed as medians and ranges. Comparisons between groups were performed by using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the4,2 test as appropriate. RESULTS: No difference could be seen in terms of age, sex, underlying disease or degree of portal pressure gradient (PPG) reduction between the ascites and the bleeding group. The PPG significantly decreased from 23.4 ± 5.3 mmHg (VB) vs 22.1± 5.5 mmHg (RA) be- fore TIPS to 11.8 ±4.0 vs 11.7 ± 4.2 after TIPS im- plantation (P = 0.001 within each group). There was a tendency towards more patients with stage CHILD A in the bleeding group compared to the ascites group (24 vs 6, P = 0.052). The median survival for the ascites group was 29 mo compared to 〉 60 mo for the bleed- ing group (P = 0.009). The number of radiological con- trols for stent patency was 6.3 for bleeders and 3.8 for ascites patients (P = 0.029). Kaplan-Meier calculation indicated that stent occlusion at first control (P = 0.027), ascites prior to TIPS implantation (P = 0.009), CHILD stage (P = 0.013), MELD score (P = 0.001) and those patients not having undergone liver transplantation (P = 0.024) were significant predictors of survival. In the Cox regression model, stent occlusion (P = 0.022), RA (P = 0.043), CHILD stage (P = 0.015) and MELD score (P = 0.004) turned out to be independent prognostic factors of survival. The anticoagulation management (P = 0.097), the porto-systemic pressure gradient (P= 0.460) and rebleeding episodes (P = 0.765) had no significant effect on the overall survival. CONCLUSION: RA, stent occlusion, initial CHILD stage and MELD score are independent predictors of survival in patients with TIPS, speaking for a close follow-up in these circumstances.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第37期5211-5218,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by A research fellowship from the Faculty of Medicine, Westflische Wilhelms-Universitt Münster
关键词 TIPS 预测因子 临床疗效 肝硬化 患者 COX回归模型 压力梯度 毫米汞柱 Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemicstent shunt Liver cirrhosis Ascites Gastrointestinalhemorrhage Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Schuppan D, Afdhal NH. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 2008; 371: 838-851.
  • 2de Franchis R, Dell'Era A, Iannuzzi F. Diagnosis and treat- ment of portal hypertension. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36:787-798.
  • 3Garcia-Tsao G. Current management of the complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: variceal hemorrhage, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterol- ogy 2001; 120:726-748.
  • 4Gin,s P, C-irdenas A, Arroyo V, Rod,s J. Management of cirrhosis and ascites. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1646-1654.
  • 5Gin,s P, Guevara M, Arroyo V, Rod,s J. Hepatorenal syn- drome. Lancet 2003; 362:1819-1827.
  • 6Colapinto RF, Stronell RD, Gildiner M, Ritchie AC, Langer B, Taylor BR, Blendis LM. Formation of intrahepatic portosys-temic shunts using a balloon dilatation catheter: preliminary clinical experience. A JR Am l Roentgeno11983; 140:709-714.
  • 7Gordon JD, Colapinto RF, Abecassis M, Makowka L, Langer B, Blendis LM, Taylor B, Stronell RD. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a nonoperative approach to life-threatening variceal bleeding. Can J Surg 1987; 30: 45-49.
  • 8Richter GM, Noeldge G, Palmaz JC, Roessle M. The tran- sjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS): results of a pilot study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1990; 13: 200-207.
  • 9Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ. The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in the Management of Portal Hypertension: update 2009. Hepatology 2010; 51:306.
  • 10Colombato L. The role ot transjugular intrahepatic porto- systemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hyper- tension. J Clin Gastroentero12007; 41 Suppl 3:$344-$351.

同被引文献111

引证文献17

二级引证文献141

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部