期刊文献+

基于作者权威值的论文价值预测算法 被引量:13

The Paper Value Prediction Algorithm Based on the Author s Authority Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论文引用网络是一个动态变化的网络,不断有新的论文加入引用网络中.传统的论文评价标准如引用次数、PageRank值等'终身评价标准'存在排挤新结点的问题,如何在海量论文中寻找有价值、被持续关注的论文,成为人们感兴趣的问题.Sayyadi提出了FutureRank算法,该算法通过预测论文未来'一段时间'的被引次数排名和PageRank值排名来达到这一目的.但FutureRank算法需提前计算PageRank值,要耗费大量运算时间.据此,我们尝试在不计算论文现有PageRank值的条件下,从论文的撰写者以及引用者的权威值的角度来预测论文未来的被引次数排名和PageRank值排名.实验结果表明,我们的算法与FutureRank相比,不但缩短了运算时间,而且提高了预测准确率. Citation network is a dynamic network and new papers are added to it every day. The traditional literature evaluation criteria like citations number and PageRank are unfair to the new node. How to retrieve the valuable papers of continuous concerns has become an interesting focus. To solve this problem, Hassan Sayyadi proposed the FutureRank algorithm, but it needs to calculate the PageRank value, which takes a lot of time. Accordingly, we proposed a paper value prediction algorithm without computing the PageRank value. We predict paperts rank of citations number and PageRank value in the future by writerst authority value and citer^s authority value. Experimental results show that as compared with FutureRank, our algorithm not only shortens the computing time but also improves the forecast accuracy.
出处 《自动化学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期1654-1662,共9页 Acta Automatica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(61133011 61170092 60973088 60873149) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(200903181 200903192)资助~~
关键词 引用网络 排名预测 FutureRank PAGERANK Citation network, ranking prediction, FutureRank, PageRank
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
  • 2Sayyadi H, Getoor L. Future rank: ranking scientific arti- cles by predicting their future PageRank. In: Proceedings of the 9th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. Sparks, NV: SIAM, 2009.
  • 3Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical Report. Stanford InfoLab, USA, 1998.
  • 4Bollen J, Rodriguez M A, van de Sompel H. Journal status. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(3): 669-687.
  • 5Chen P, Xie H, Maslov S, Redner S. Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm. ,Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1(1): 8-15.
  • 6Ma N, Guan J C, Zhao Y. Bringing PageRank to the cita- tion analysis. Information Processing & Management, 2008, 44(2): 800-810.
  • 7Bergstrom C T, West J D, Wiseman M A. The Eigenfactor^TM Metrics. Journal of Neuroscience, 2008, 28(45): 11433-11434.
  • 8Kleinberg J M. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked envi- ronment. Journal of the ACM, 1999, 46(5): 604-632.
  • 9Berberich K, Vazirgiannis M Weikum G. Time-aware au- thority ranking. Internet Mnthematics, 2005, 2(3): 301-332.
  • 10Dong A L, Chang Y, Zheng Z H, Mishne G, Bai J, Zhang R Q, Buchner K, Liao C Y, Diaz F. Towards recency rank- ing in web search. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Inter- national Conference on Web search and data mining. New York, USA: ACM, 2010. 11-20.

同被引文献85

  • 1刘杰,陆君安.一个小型科研合作复杂网络及其分析[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2004,1(3):56-61. 被引量:56
  • 2何荣利.关于影响因子的分析与思考[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(2):21-23. 被引量:15
  • 3李晓萍,姜瑾秋,邢宝山,王丽.影响因子和总被引频次在期刊评价中的作用[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2006,16(4):270-272. 被引量:31
  • 4李长玲,翟雪梅.基于PageRank的引文分析方法探讨[J].情报理论与实践,2007,30(1):122-124. 被引量:23
  • 5Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O,et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review [ J ]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2002, 287 (20) :2691-2700.
  • 6Spyridakis J H , Freeman S F. An examination of factors that affect the credibility of online health information [ J ]. Technical Communication, 2004, 51 (2): 239-264.
  • 7Encyclopedia Britannica. authority[ EB/OL]. [ 2013-12- 25 ]. http://www, britannica, corn/search? query = authority.
  • 8Wilson P. Second-hand knowledge :An inquiry into cognitive authority[ M]. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1983.
  • 9Rieh S Y. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web[ J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002, 53 (2) : 145-161.
  • 10Alexander J E, Tate M A. Web Wisdom : How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web [ M ]. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbanm Associates, 1999 : 11-12.

引证文献13

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部