摘要
交通肇事罪中"因逃逸致人死亡"的共犯的相关司法解释仅规定了四种主体,但对实践中出现的其他主体的类似行为如何处理?对该问题的解析需要从司法解释的性质入手,若要明确司法解释的性质,需要从交通肇事罪的主观罪过及其客观表现着手。只有在明晰"交通肇事致人死亡"主观罪过包括直接故意、间接故意、过于自信的过失的基础上,就各个罪过类型的客观表现进行区分,才能在此基础上将相关解释定性为"注意规定",并以此对疑题进行解析。
The accomplices of death caused by "Escape Case" in traffic accident crime can be classified as four kinds of subjects, according to relevant judicial interpretations. Another problem is that how to deal with other similar subjects in judicial practice. The access to this problem lies in the nature of judicial interpretations and we should begin with the subjective mistake and objective representation of traffic accident crime. If we make clear the direct intent, indirect intent and overconfidence of death caused by traffic accident crime, we can dis tinguish different objective representations of crimes and define relevant interpretations as "rules", according to which an analysis on this problem can be achieved.
出处
《安徽警官职业学院学报》
2012年第4期32-35,41,共5页
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词
交通肇事罪
逃逸致人死亡
共犯
traffic accident crime
death caused by "Escape Case" in traffic accident crime
accomplice