2Newton P., Driver R., Osborne J.. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education,1999,21(5):553-576.
3Duschl R., Ellenbogan K., Erduran S.. Promoting argumenta- tion in middle school science classrooms: A Project SEPIA e- valuation. A paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
4Cavagnetto A. R.. Argument to foster scientific literacy: A re- view of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Re- view of Educational Research,2010,80(3):336-371.
5Sampson V., Grooms J.. Science as Argument-Driven Inquiry: The impact on students' conceptions of NOS. Paper presented at the 2008 Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Balt- imore, MD.
6Sampson V., Gleim L.. Argument-Driven Inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts &practices in biology. The American biology teacher, 2009, 71(8): 465-472.
8Sampson V., Grooms J., Enderle P.. New instruments that can be used by researchers to assess three different aspects of sc- ience proficiency. Paper presented at the 2011 Fall Conferen- ce for the Society for Research on Educational Effective- (SREE). Washington, DC.
9Enderle P., Grooms J., Sampson V.. The importance of using multiple measures to assess science proficiency. Paper presen- ted at the 2011 Annual Conference of the Association of Sci- ence Teacher Educators (ASTE). Clearwater, FL.
10Liang L., Chen X., Chen S. et al. Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry (SUSSI): Revision and Further Validation of an Assessment Instrument. Paper presented at the 2006 AnnualConference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.
二级参考文献20
1Toulmin S. E.. The uses of argument. London: Cambridge Un- iversity Press, 1958:87-99.
2Erduran S., Simon S., Osborne J.. TAPping into argumentati- on:Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pa- ttern for studying seienee discourse. Seienee Edueation, 2004, 88(6):915-933.
3Driver R., Newton P., Osborne J.. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.Science Education,2000, 84(3):287-313.
4Kuhn D.. Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 1993, 77 (3): 319-337.
5Driver R., Asoko H., Leach J. et al. Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 1994, 23 (7):5-12.
6Newton P., Driver R., Osborne J.. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science.International Journal of Sci- ence Education, 1999, 21(5): 553-576.
7Dusehl R., Ellenbogan K., Erduran S.. Promoting argumenta- tion in middle school science classrooms: A Project SEPIA e- valuation. A paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
8Felton M. K.. The development of discourse strategies in ad- olescent argument. Cognitive Development,2004,19(1):35-52.
9Aufschnaiter C., Erdurane S., Osborne J. et al. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' ar- gumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of r- esearch in science teaching, 2008,45(1):101-131.
10Sampson V., Walker J., Dial K. et al. Learning to write in undergraduate chemistry: The impact of Argument-Driven In- quiry.Paper presented at the 2010 Annual International Con- ference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, PA.
7Driver R., Newt on, P., Osborne J.. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.Science Education,2000, 84(3):287-312.
8Niaz M., Aguilera D., Maza A. eta/. Arguments, Contradicti- ons, Resistances, and Conceptual Change in Students& Unde- rstanding of Atomic Structure. Science Education, 2002,86(4): 505-525.
9National Research Council. National science education standa- rds. Washington: National Academy Press. 1996: 113.
10Simonneaux L.. Role-play or debate to promote students' ar- gumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgene- sis. International Journal of Science Education,2001, 23(9): 903-927.
