期刊文献+

基于格论的GNSS模糊度解算 被引量:27

GNSS Ambiguity Resolution Using the Lattice Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 快速、准确地解算整周模糊度是实现GNSS载波相位实时高精度定位的关键,由于模糊度之间的强相关,基于整数最小二乘估计准则时,需要较长的时间才能搜索出最优的整周模糊度向量。为了提高模糊度的搜索效率,本文在扼要介绍格论的理论框架基础上,引入基于格论的模糊度解算方法,通过格基规约来降低模糊度之间的相关性,从而快速搜索出最优的整数模糊度向量。与此同时,将GNSS领域的主要降相关方法统一到格论框架下,探讨了并建议采用Boot-strapping成功率作为格基规约的性能指标之一。最后试验分析三频多系统长基线相对定位情况下,不同格基规约可获得的性能。 Fast and reliable ambiguity resolution plays a critical role in GNSS real-time precise positioning, however, the computational complexity of finding the optimal integer ambiguity vector directly will be high, because there is strong correction between ambiguities. Thus the lattice theory was introduced in this paper to reduce the correlation for improving the computational efficiency of ambiguity resolution, and the main decorrelation methods currently existed were also analyzed and transformed into the methods of lattice reduction. Then the Bootstrapping success rate was suggested and tested by an experiment to show the performance of these decorrelation methods used for long-baseline ambiguity resolution with multi-frequency GNSS signals.
出处 《测绘学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期636-645,共10页 Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
关键词 GNSS 模糊度解算 降相关 格论 格基规约 Bootstrapping成功率 GNSS ambiguity resolution decorrelation lattice theory lattice reduction Bootstrappingsuccess rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1REMONDI B W. Pseudo-kinematic GPS Results Using the Ambiguity Function Method [J]. Navigation Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1991, 38(1)17-36.
  • 2ABIDIN H Z. On the Construction of the Ambiguity Searching Space for On-the-fly Ambiguity Resolution [J]. Navigation: Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1993, 40 (3): 321-338.
  • 3FREI E, BEUTLER G. Rapid Static Positioning Based on the Fast Ambiguity Resolution Approach FARA: Theory and First Results [J]. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 1990, 15 (6) 326-356.
  • 4CHEN D, LACHAPELLE G. A Comparison of the FASF and Least-squares Search Algorithms for on-the-fly Ambi- guity Resolution [J]. Navigation Journal of The Institute of Navigation, 1995, 42(2) :371-390.
  • 5TEUNISSEN P J G. Least-squares Estimation of the Integer GPS Ambiguities [C] //Proceedings of International Asso- ciation of Geodesy General Meeting. Beijing: [ s. n. ], 1993.
  • 6HAN S, RIZOS C. A New Method for Constructing Multi- satellite Ambiguity Combinations for Improved Ambiguity Resolution [C] // Proceedings of ION GPS-95..2. Cali{ornia: Is. n. 1, 1995.
  • 7LI Z, GAO Y. Direct Construction of High Dimension Ambiguity Transformation for the Lambda Method [C] // Proceeding of KIS97. Banffrs. n. 1,1997.
  • 8LIULT, HSUH T, ZHUYZ, et al. A New Approach to GPS Ambiguity Decorrelation [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 1999, 73(10) :478-490.
  • 9XU P. Random Simulation and GPS Decorrelation [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2001,75 (7) 408-423.
  • 10CHANG X W, YANG X, ZHOU T. Mlambda A Modified LAMBDA Method for Integer Least-squares Estimation [J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2005,79(9):552-565.

同被引文献241

引证文献27

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部