期刊文献+

两级Fenton-BAF用于垃圾渗滤液深度处理工程 被引量:7

Application of Two-stage Fenton/BAF in Advanced Treatment of Landfill Leachate
原文传递
导出
摘要 垃圾渗滤液经过常规工艺处理后,COD和TN仍然很高,难以达到排放标准。垃圾渗滤液生化处理出水COD约为1 500 mg/L,TN约为400 mg/L,采用两级Fenton-曝气生物滤池(BAF)组合工艺对垃圾渗滤液生化处理出水进行深度处理。双氧水加药量按照与COD的质量比为1∶1来控制,硫酸亚铁的投加量按照与COD的质量比为2∶1来控制,Fenton反应pH值控制在3左右,单级Fenton的反应时间控制在10 h。BAF脱氮反应的进水碳氮比控制在4∶1左右,单级BAF的停留时间约为2 d。实际工程运行结果表明:该工艺运行稳定,出水水质好,对COD与TN的去除率分别为96%和95%,出水COD和TN分别为60 mg/L和20 mg/L,达到了《生活垃圾填埋场污染控制标准》(GB 16889—2008)的表2标准。 After conventional treatment, COD and TN concentrations in landfill leachate were still too high to meet the discharge limits. COD and TN in the biological treatment effluent were about 1 500 mg/L and 400 mg/L respectively. The combined process of two-stage Fenton/BAF was applied in the ad- vanced treatment of landfill leachate after biological treatment. The mass ratios of H202 to COD and fer- rous sulfate to COD were controlled at 1 : 1 and 2 : 1, pH of the Fenton oxidation reaction was 3, and the reaction time of each stage of Fenton oxidation was about 10 h. C/N ratio of the BAF influent was 4 : 1, and hydraulic retention time of each stage of BAF was 2 d. The operation results showed that the combined process was stable and the effluent was good. The removal rates of COD and TN were 96% and 95% respectively. COD and TN concentrations in the effluent were 60 mg/L and 20 mg/L respectively. The effluent met the table 2 criteria specified in Standard for Pollution Control on the mestic Waste ( GB 16889 - 2008 ).
出处 《中国给水排水》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第20期125-128,共4页 China Water & Wastewater
关键词 垃圾渗滤液 landfill leachate Fenton/BAF advanced treatment Landfill Site for Do-
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1杨开明,张建强,杨小林,王华,何伟,吴瑞平.垃圾卫生填埋场渗滤液组合处理工艺设计与调试[J].中国给水排水,2006,22(10):61-64. 被引量:7
  • 2[1]Choi H J.Evaluation of fenton's process for the treatment of landfill leachate[M].Delaware:University of Delaware,1998.
  • 3[2]Pobiner H.Determination of hydroperoxides in hydrocarbon by conversion to hydrogen peroxide and measurement by titanium complexing[J].Anal Chem,1961,33:1423-1426.
  • 4[3]APHA,AWWA,WPCF.Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (18th ed)[M].American Public Health Association,American Water Works Association,Water Pollution Control Federation,Washington DC:USA,1992.
  • 5[4]Kim Y-K,Huh I R.Enhancing biological treatability of landfill leachate by chemical oxidation[J].Environ Eng Sci,1997,14(1):73-79.
  • 6[5]Chiang E S K,DeWalle F B.Sanitary landfill leachates and their treatment[J].ASCE,1976,102(EE-2):411-431.
  • 7[6]Stumm W,Morgan J J.Aquatic chemistry (3rd ed)[M].New York:John Wiley,1996.
  • 8[7]Bishop D F,Stern G,Fleischman M,et al.Hydrogen peroxie catalytic oxidation of refractory organics in municipal wastewaters[J].I & EC Proc Des Dev,1968,7:110-117.
  • 9[1]Batchelor S E,Coope M,Chhabra S B,et al.Celldensensity-regulated recovery of starved biofilm populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteha[J].Appl Env Microbiol,1997,63(6):2281-2286.
  • 10由雪峰,汪苹,冯旭东,李志军.A^2/O法与混凝法联合处理垃圾渗滤液[J].北京工商大学学报(自然科学版),2007,25(4):8-11. 被引量:1

共引文献141

同被引文献42

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部