背叛还是继承——约翰·罗默与马克思主义经济学

Betrayal or Inheriting——John Roemer and Marxist Economics

新古典经济学与马克思主义经济学二者一直被看做是针锋相对的。约翰.罗默及以他为代表的"分析的马克思主义"学派,却以广泛存在于新古典经济学的数学模型化的方法来阐释马克思主义经济学的经典问题。本文通过分析罗默学术思想,认为他在基本价值取向上是一个不折不扣的马克思主义者,如他认为资本主义制度是剥削人的制度,生产资料公有制必将取代资本主义私有制;但同时,他又反对整个马克思主义理论的基石——劳动价值论,呈现出思想上的矛盾性。

Neo-classical economics and Marxist Economics have been seen as diametri- cally opposed. John Roemer and his faction ＂Analytical Marxism＂ use mathematical model of neoclassical economics to explain the classic problem of Marxist Economics. Through the analysis of Roemer＇ s research, the writer hold the opinion that his basic value is fully-fledged Marxists＇ , for example, he considers that the capitalist system is full of exploitation, also he believes that the public ownership will replace the private ownership. Meanwhile, he also objects to labor value theory which is the cornerstone of the whole Marxism theory. Above all, he shows total ideological contradictions.