期刊文献+

T型钙离子通道阻滞药治疗慢性肾病合并高血压的系统评价 被引量:3

T-type Calcium Channel Blockers for Chronic Kidney Disease Complicating with Hypertension:a System Review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价T型钙离子通道阻滞药治疗慢性肾病合并高血压的疗效。方法:计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、Central、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、万方数据库及维普数据库(VIP),收集T型钙离子通道阻滞药与L型钙离子通道阻滞药治疗慢性肾病合并高血压的临床随机对照试验(RCT),采用RevMan5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入4项RCT,合计272例患者。Meta分析结果显示,L型钙离子通道阻滞药对收缩压的控制好于T型[WMD=1.58,95%C(I1.20,1.95),P<0.00001],对舒张压的控制与T型相当[WMD=0.42,95%CI(-1.60,2.45),P=0.68];与L型钙离子通道阻滞药比较,T型可显著地提高肌酐清除率[WMD=7.79,95%CI(4.75,10.82),P<0.00001]。结论:T型钙离子通道阻滞药用于治疗慢性肾病合并高血压,能够有效降低血压,改善肾脏功能。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of T-type calcium channel blockers (CCB) for chronic kidney disease complicating with hypertension systematically. METHODS: Retrieved from PubMed, EMbase, Central, CNKI, Wanfang data- base and VIP, randomized controlled trials about T-type CCB and L-type CCB for chronic kidney disease complicating with hypertension were collected. Meta-analysis was performed for included studies using Revman 5.1 software. RESULTS: 4 RCTs were included, involving 272 subjects. Results of Meta-analysis indicated L-type CCB was better than T-type CCB in control of systolic pressure, compared with L-type CCB [WMD=l.58, 95%CI(1.20, 1.95), P〈0.000 01], similar to T-type CCB in control of dia- stolic pressure [WMD = 0.42, 95 % CI (- 1.60, 2.45), P= 0.68] ; T-type CCB performed an improvement of creatinine clearance rate, compared with L-type CCB[WMD=7.79, 95% CI(4.75 , 10.82), P〈0.000 01]. CONCLUSION: T-type CCB is benefit to chronic kidney disease patients with hypertension. It can reduce blood pressure effectively and improve renal function.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 2012年第40期3816-3818,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 T型钙离子通道阻滞药 高血压 慢性肾病 系统评价 T-type calcium channel blockers Hypertension Chronic kidney disease System review
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Casas JP, Chua W, Loukogeorgakis S, et al. Effect of in- hibitors of the renin-angiotensin system and other antihypertensive drugs on renal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, 2005,366 (9 502) : 2 026.
  • 2Griffin KA, Picken MM, Bakris GL, et al. Class differ- ences in the effects of calcium channel blockers in the rat remnant kidney model[J]. Kidney Int, 1999,55(5) : 1 849.
  • 3Tomino Y, Shimizu Y, Hamada C, et al. One-year resu- lts of an open-label study on antiproteinuric effect of beni- dipine in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. J Nephrol, 2011,24(6) : 756.
  • 4Abe M, Okada K, Maruyama N, et al. Benidipine reduc- es albuminuria and plasma aldosterone in mild-to-moder- ate stage chronic kidney disease with albuminuria[J]. Hy- pertens Res, 2011,34(2) : 268.
  • 5Bellinghieri G, Mazzaglia G, Savica V, et al. Effects of manidipine and nifedipine on blood pressure and renal function in patients with chronic renal failure: a multi- center randomized controlled trial[J]. Ren Fail, 2003, 25 (5):681.
  • 6Inoue S, Tomino Y. Effects of calcium antagonists in hy- pertensive patients with renal dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, parallel trial comparing benidipine and nife- dioine[J]. Nephroloev (Carlton), 2004,9( 5 ) : 265.
  • 7Nakamura T, Sato E, Fujiwara N, et al. Comparative ef- fects of benidipine and amlodipine on proteinuria, urinary 8-OHdG, urinary L-FABP, and inflammatory and athero- sclerosis markers in early-stage chronic kidney disease [J]. Am JMedSci, 2010,339(2) : 157.
  • 8范治国,刘治安.抗高血压药的研究进展与临床应用评价[J].中国药房,2010,21(42):4011-4013. 被引量:7
  • 9Hayashi K, Nagahama T, Oka K, et al. Disparate effects renal of calcium antagonists microcirculation[J]. Hyper- tens Res, 1996,19( 1 ) : 31.
  • 10Tanaka T, Tsutamoto T, Sakai H, et al. Comparison of the effects of efonidipine and amlodipine on aldosterone in patients with hypertension[J]. Hypertens Res, 2007,30 (8):691.

二级参考文献1

  • 1A. H. Barnett. Preventing renal complications in diabetic patients: the Diabetics Exposed to Telmisartan And enalaprIL (DETAIL) study*[J] 2005,Acta Diabetologica(1):s42~s49

共引文献6

同被引文献45

  • 1刘国树.钙离子通道阻滞剂治疗高血压病新进展[J].中国药物应用与监测,2006,3(4):1-4. 被引量:10
  • 2李沪生,刘远谋.心脏中的T型钙通道[J].上海第二医科大学学报,2005,25(2):188-190. 被引量:1
  • 3张志国,张庆柱.T型钙通道及其作用药物研究进展[J].中国药理学通报,2007,23(2):143-147. 被引量:10
  • 4刘元生,郭继鸿,张海澄,李学斌,许原,张幼贻,袁兰.犬心房颤动时T型钙通道在心房电重塑中的作用及机制探讨[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(12):929-931. 被引量:7
  • 5Miler R J.Rocking and rolling with Ca2+ channels[J].Trends Neurosci,2001,24(8):445-449.
  • 6Woittiez A J,Huysmans F T,Bailey R,et al.A comparison of the safety and efficacy of mibefradil and nifedipine SR in patients with renal disease and hypertension[J].Clin Nephrol,1998,49(3):160-166.
  • 7Chung O,Hinder M,Sharma A M,et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of losartan (50-100 mg) with the T-type calcium channel blocker mibefradil (50-100 mg) in mild to moderate hypertension[J].Fundam Clin Pharmacol,2000,14(1):31-41.
  • 8JATOS Study Group.The Japanese Trial to Assess Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure in Elderly Hypertensive Patients (JATOS):protocol,patient characteristics,and blood pressure during the first 12 months[J].Hypertens Res,2005,28(6):513-520.
  • 9Ohashi N,Mitamura H,Ogawa S.Development of newer calcium channel antagonists:therapeutic potential of efonidipine in preventing electrical remodelling during atrial fibrillation[J].Drugs,2009,69(1):21-30.
  • 10Mulder P,Richard V,Compagnon P,et al.Increased survival after long-term treatment with?mibefradil,a selective T-channel calcium antagonist,in heart failure[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,29(2):416-421.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部