摘要
目的:观察临床应用中传统输液器与天窗自排气输液器的排气效果。方法:随机抽取2010年1月-2012年1月在心内科输液的200名患者,随机分成两组A组与B组,各100例,对照组用传统输液法,观察组用天窗加自排气输液器,比较两组一次与二次排气成功率。结果:观察组与实验组在一次与二次排气成功率差异有统计学意义。结论:天窗自排气输液器作为一种新的输液器,一次排气成功率显著高于传统的输液器,而且还可以进行二次排气,临床效果比传统的输液器更好。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of traditional infusion and self-bleeding infusion set. Methods: 200 patients were selected, and randomly divided into Group A (100 cases) and group B (100 cases). The patients in control group used traditional infusion while the patients in observation group used self-bleeding infusion set adding a scuttle. The clinical effect of two groups was recorded. Results: It's a significant difference between the observation group and the experimental group on once and second exhaust successful rate. Conclusions: The self-bleeding infusion set adding a scuttle contains a higher once exhaust successful rate than traditional infusion, and also could do secondary exhaust.
出处
《现代生物医学进展》
CAS
2012年第27期5350-5352,共3页
Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词
传统输液器
排气
天窗自排气输液器
Traditional infusion
Exhaustion
Self-bleeding infusion set adding a scuttle