期刊文献+

烧伤创面细菌培养及药敏分析 被引量:5

Bacterial culture and drug sensitivity analysis in burn surface
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析烧伤创面分泌物的细菌检出率及耐药性。方法烧伤患者112例创面采集标本212份,用普通细菌培养方法,进行培养、分离、鉴定,做细菌药敏和细菌耐药试验。结果 212份标本中细菌生长阳性138份(65.09%),其中以金黄色葡萄球菌(27.54%)和铜绿假单胞菌(24.64%)为主,且耐药性较高。金黄色葡萄球菌对头孢噻肟敏感性最高(54.4%),铜绿假单胞菌对阿米卡星敏感性最高(70.2%)。结论应及早进行创面细菌培养,根据细菌和药敏试验结果合理选择使用抗生素。 Objective To analyze the bacterial detection rate and drug-resistance features of the secretion in the burn surface. Methods 212 specimens were collected from the secretion of burn surface of 112 cases patients. Underwent the general bacterial culture methods for culture isolation and identification. Bacterial drug sensitivity and bacterial susceptibility test were performed. Results In 212 specimens, 138 cases were positive(65.09% ). Pathogenic bacteria were mainly made up of staphylococcus(27.54% ) and pseudomonas(24.64% ) ,accounted for the high drug resistance. To cefotaxime,staphylococcus aureus had the highest sensitivity (54.4%). To amikacin, pseudomonas had the highest sensitivity (70.2%). Conclusion Early wound bacterial culture, bacteria and drug sensitivity test result according to the reasonable choice of antibiotics should be performed.
作者 刘明华
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2012年第31期7-8,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 烧伤创面 细菌培养 耐药分析 Burn surface Bacterial culture Analysis of drug resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1乔亮,杨惠忠,袁克俭,王文奎,董鹤亮,许伟石.抑制应激反应措施对严重烧伤大鼠早期创面侵袭性感染的影响[J].中华烧伤杂志,2005,21(2):85-88. 被引量:10
  • 2张海军,夏照帆,胡晓燕.不动杆菌新近流行趋势与耐药机制及其治疗策略的研究进展[J].中华烧伤杂志,2007,23(1):75-78. 被引量:10
  • 3肖光夏.烧伤感染的现状、对策与防治新动向[J].中华烧伤杂志,2007,23(2):81-83. 被引量:31
  • 4Order SE . Experimental bum wound sepsis // Order SE , Moncrief JA. The burn wound. Thomas : Springfield Ⅲ, 1965 : 21 - 31.
  • 5许伟石 徐大忠 袁保政 等.焦痂下组织细菌定量的临床意义[J].上海第二医学院学报,1982,3(1):19-22.
  • 6Teplitz C, Davis D, Manson AD, et al. Pseudomonasburnwound sepsis. I pathogenesis of experimental pseudomonas burn wound sepsis. J Surg Res, 1964, 4(5) :200-216.
  • 7Marvin JA , Heck EL , Loebl EC , et al . Usefulness of blood cultures in confirming septic complications in burn patients: evaluation of a new method. J Trauma,1975,15(8) :657-662.
  • 8McManus AT , Kin SH , McManus WF , et al . Comparison of quantitative microbiology and-histopathology in divided burn wound biopsy specimens. Arch Surg, 1987,122 ( 1 ) :74-76.
  • 9Bone RC. Sir Isaac Newton, sepsis, SIRS, and CARS. Crit Care Med, 1996, 24(7) : 1125-1128.
  • 10van Belkum A, Kluytmans J, van Leeuwen W, et al. Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol, 1995,33(6):1537-1547.

共引文献47

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部