期刊文献+

谁是高等教育的最大受益者?——来自转型中国的经验证据 被引量:7

Who Benefits Most from Higher Education Expansion? Empirical Evidence for Transitional China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于1992年到2008年进行的6次全国性住户抽样调查数据,本文利用倾向得分匹配法,考察了高等教育扩张前后教育回报率的差异及其变化。在控制了样本选择性偏差后,倾向得分匹配结果与反事实分析框架下的因果推断相一致。研究显示高等教育回报率并不是呈均等化分布的,而是由不同的选择机制和收入预期所决定。那些原本受教育水平和收入水平都普遍较低的从业者,其选择进入大学接受再教育的倾向性较高,而且一旦其选择进入就会获益最多。 Using the National Households Survey data from 1992 to 2008,this paper examines the differences and changes on the rate of returns to education before and after higher education expansion by means of propensity score matching.By controlling sample selection bias,propensity score matching shows that the rates of returns to higher education are not distributed equally.Instead,it depends on different income expectations and selection mechanisms.The rational behavior theory suggests that those who are the most likely to choose entering college benefit most from college.In contrast, reverse behavioral choice theory asserts that workers who have low education level and low socio-economic status have higher tendency to enter college,and if they do choice so,they will benefit most from higher education.
作者 陈纯槿
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期135-152,188,共18页 Peking University Education Review
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金(09YJA880045) 教育科学规划基金(CFA030053) 国家自然科学基金(71173020) 国家留学基金(20123013)
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1陈晓宇,闵维方.我国高等教育个人收益率研究[J].高等教育研究,1998,19(6):33-37. 被引量:125
  • 2陈晓宇,陈良焜,夏晨.20世纪90年代中国城镇教育收益率的变化与启示[J].北京大学教育评论,2003,1(2):65-72. 被引量:135
  • 3李实,丁赛.中国城镇教育收益率的长期变动趋势[J].中国社会科学,2003(6):58-72. 被引量:474
  • 4李实,赵人伟.市场化改革与收入差距扩大(英)[J].中国社会科学,2011(2):140-158.
  • 5邢春冰,李实.扩招“大跃进”、教育机会与大学毕业生就业[J].经济学(季刊),2011,10(3):1187-1208. 被引量:123
  • 6Rosenbaum, P. R. , & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70( 1 ) : 41-55.
  • 7Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Associa- tion, 79(387) : 516-524.
  • 8Raftery, A. E. , & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75. Sociology of Education, 66(1) : 41- 62.
  • 9Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106 (6) : 1642-1690.
  • 10Hout, M. (2007). Maximally maintained inequality revisited: Irish educational mobility in comparative perspective. Nic Ghiolla Ph6draig, M. , & Hilliard, B. Changing Ireland in international comparison. Ireland: Liffey Press, 23-39.

二级参考文献134

共引文献1396

同被引文献324

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部