期刊文献+

决策与判断中的过度自信研究述评 被引量:1

Review on Overconfidence in Process of Judgment and Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 过度自信是人们高估自己决策和判断正确性的一种现象,对过度自信的研究可以为企业和个体的安全管理、投资决策等提供理论依据和实践指导。在综述以往研究的基础上,文章将当前有关过度自信的研究区分为个体、群体和社会文化三种研究取向,并对过度自信的理论和模型进行了述评。未来研究应提高过度自信研究的生态效度,整合个体、群体和社会文化三种研究取向,把动机偏差、信息偏差和认知偏差结合起来,进行多维、多层结构建模。 Overconfidence is a phenomenon that people overestimate the correction of their judgment and decision making.The research on overconfidence can provide theoretical and practical guidance for people’s and enterprise’s safety management and investigation decision making et al.On the basis of review on the former overconfidence research,this research differentiated the overconfidence research into three research orientations: individual orientation,group orientation,and social culture orientation,and then commented on the theories and models of overconfidence.The future research should enhance the ecological validity,and integrate individual,group,and social culture research orientation,at the same time,combine the motive bias,information bias,and cognition bias,so as to conduct multidimensional and hierarchical construct modeling.
出处 《科学.经济.社会》 CSSCI 2012年第3期61-65,共5页 Science Economy Society
基金 安徽省高校省级优秀青年人才基金项目(2012SQRL019ZD) 安徽大学首批青年骨干教师培养对象资助项目(33010035) 安徽大学青年科学研究基金资助项目(SKQN1005)
关键词 过度自信 研究取向 动机偏差 信息偏差 认知偏差 overconfidence research orientation motive bias information bias cognitive bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Schaefer P S, Williams C C, Goodie A S, Campbell W K. Over- confidence and the big five [ J]. Journal of Research in Person- ality, 2004, 38 (5) : 473-480.
  • 2Campbell W K, Goodie A S. Narcissism, overconfidence, and decision making [ Z]. Unpublished manuscript. Georgia: Uni- vesity of Georgia, 2003.
  • 3Stone E R, Dodrill C L, Johnson N. Depressive cognition: A test of depressive realism versus negativity using general knowl- edge questions [ J]. Journal of Personality, 2001, 135 (6) : 583-602.
  • 4Wolfe R N, Grosch J W. Personality correlates of confidence in one's decisions [ J ]. Journal of Personality, 1990, 58 ( 3 ) : 515-534.
  • 5Larrick R P, Burson K A, Soil J B. Social comparison and con- fidence : When thinking you' re better than average predicts over- confidence (and when it does not) [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 200?, 102( 1 ) : 76-94.
  • 6Feldman J M, Lynch J G Jr. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief attitude intention and behavior [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73(8) : 421-435.
  • 7Wallsten T S, Budescu D V. Encoding subjective probabilities:a psychological and psychometric review [ J ]. Management Sci- ence, 1983, 29(2) : 151-173.
  • 8Murphy A H, Winkler R L. Probability Forecasting in meteorolo gy [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1984,79:489-500.
  • 9Winkler R L, Poses R M. Evaluating and combining physicians' probabilities of survival in an intensive care unit [ J ]. Manage- ment Science, 1993, 39: 1526-1543.
  • 10Erev I, Wallsten T S, Budescu D V. Simuhaneous over mad un- der-confidence : The role of error in judgment process [ J ]. Psy- chological Review, 1994, 101(3):519-527.

二级参考文献42

  • 1昝玉林,许文贤.网络政治参与中的“群体极化”探析[J].新德育.思想理论教育(综合版),2005(10):25-29. 被引量:16
  • 2于窈,李纾.“过分自信”的研究及其跨文化差异[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):468-474. 被引量:25
  • 3李纾 房永青.《新加坡21》对双语青年学生的决策影响[J].(香港)青年研究学报,2002,5(2):162-162.
  • 4Teigen K H,Brun W.Verbal probabilities:A question of frame? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2003,16:53~72
  • 5Koriat A,Lichtenstein S,Fischhoff B.Reasons for confidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory,1980,6:107~118
  • 6Larrick,R P.Motivational factors in decision theories:The role of self-protection.Psychological Bulletin,1993,113:440~450
  • 7Soll J B.Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration:The roles of random error and ecological structure.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,65:117~137
  • 8Soll J B.Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration:The roles of random error and ecological structure.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,65:117~137
  • 9uantak L,Bolger F,Ferrell W R.The hard-easy effect in subjective probability calibration.Organizational Behavior and Human Decisiton Processes,1996,67:201~221
  • 10Juslin P.The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of almanac items.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,1994,57:226~246

共引文献32

同被引文献9

  • 1黎民.社会保障领域的道德风险及其规避[J].社会科学研究,2004(5):101-105. 被引量:26
  • 2张剑波,潘留仙.民办高校兼职教师中的道德风险及其规避探析[J].现代大学教育,2006,22(5):59-61. 被引量:9
  • 3.列宁全集(第13卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1959,6..
  • 4马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社.1956.76
  • 5詹森,梅克林.企业理论:管理行为、代理成本与所有权结构[M].上海:三联书店,1998.
  • 6[英]约翰·伊特节尔编.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典(第3卷).陈岱孙译.北京:经济科学出版社.1992.588.
  • 7高兆明.应当重视"道德风险"研究[J].浙江社会科学,2000(3):108.
  • 82012年中国学生资助发展报告[N].中国教育报.2013-11-13(4).
  • 9Gigerenzer. G. How to Make Cognitive lllusion Disappear: Beyond Heuristics and biases. European Re- view of Social Psychology. 1991.2,83 -115.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部