期刊文献+

大学生内隐自尊的价值取向 被引量:2

The Value Orientation of Implicit Self-esteem of College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对自尊的价值取向问题进行了测量和研究,即大学生在能力和道德价值取向上内隐自尊效应的差异。方法采用Inquist心理软件编制的内隐联想实验(Implicit Association Test),对88名在校大学生自尊的能力和道德两方面的价值取向进行测量,并比较不同性别的能力和道德取向间的差异。结果①道德取向和能力取向的内隐联想实验均产生了IAT效应(d1=1.24,d2=0.64);②道德取向的内隐自尊效应与能力取向的内隐自尊效应差异显著(t=2.613,P<0.05);③能力内隐自尊效应与道德内隐自尊效应在性别上均存在显著差异(t1=-2.148,df=45,P<0.05;t2=-2.190,df=41,P<0.05)。结论道德内隐自尊效应要优于能力内隐自尊效应。在东方文化的背景下,内隐自尊效应明显,尤其体现在男性方面,即无论是道德还是能力方面都倾向于对自我持有积极地评价,但其强度仍不如西方人。 Objective To study and measure the two aspects of the value orientation of self-esteem-ability and morality.Methods Using the Implicit Association Test made with Inquisit psychological software.A total of 88 students were assessed on self-esteems depends on ability and morality aspects,while comparing the deference between gender and value orientation of self-esteem-ability and morality.Results ① Both value orientation of ability self-esteem and value orientation of morality self-esteem produced IAT effects(d1=1.24,d2=0.64);②There was a significant difference between morality-oriented implicit self-esteem effect and that of ability-oriented(t=2.613,P0.05);③ There were significant gender differences in ability of implicit self-esteem effect and morality of implicit self-esteem effect(t=-2.148,-2.190;P0.05).Conclusion Morality-oriented implicit self-esteem effect should be superior with that of ability-oriented.In oriental culture,implicit self-esteem is evident,especially presented by males,which is to say that they are inclined to have a positive assessment of themselves,though they are not as optimistic as western people.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2012年第9期1414-1416,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 实验心理学 内隐联想实验 内隐自尊 价值取向 Experimental psychology IAT Implicit self-esteem Value orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献51

共引文献206

同被引文献41

  • 1张镇,李幼穗.内隐自尊的研究趋势及测量方法[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):961-963. 被引量:18
  • 2周帆,王登峰.外显和内隐自尊与心理健康的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(3):197-199. 被引量:83
  • 3王登峰.自我和谐量表的编制[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2(1):19-22. 被引量:544
  • 4许静,梁宁建,王岩,王新法.内隐自尊的ERP研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(4):792-796. 被引量:18
  • 5张冰蓉.道德/不道德启动对道德判断的影响及其心理机制[D].桂林:广西师范大学教育科学学院,2012.
  • 6Newman G E, Bloom P, Knobe J. Value judgments and the true self[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2014,40 (2) : 203-216.
  • 7Epley N,Dunning D.Feeling " holier than thou ":Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction. [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000:79-79.
  • 8Greene J D.Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains[J].Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007,11 (8) : 322-323.
  • 9Gawronski B, Bodenhausen G V. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation : An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2006,132 (5) : 692-731.
  • 10Deutsch R, Strack F. Duality models in social psychology: From dual processes to interacting systems[J].Psychological Inquiry, 2006,17:166-172.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部