期刊文献+

土壤宏蛋白质组学在土壤污染评价中的应用 被引量:3

Applications of soil metaproteomics in soil pollution assessment:A review
原文传递
导出
摘要 土壤微生物指标是评价土壤污染程度的重要生物学指标之一.近年来,随着分子生物学的发展,应用宏基因组学、宏转录组学和宏蛋白质组学技术考察土壤微生物的生态功能成为土壤功能的研究热点.相对于宏基因组学和宏转录组学,土壤宏蛋白质组学是以土壤微生物基因的功能组分——蛋白质为直接研究对象,考察不同时空点提取出来的土壤蛋白质的变化规律,更有助于揭示土壤微生物的生态功能及其在污染物迁移转化过程中的作用,在评价土壤污染方面也更具潜力.目前,土壤宏蛋白质组学正处于起步阶段,而土壤蛋白质的提取方法是制约其发展的主要因素之一,因此本文综述了蛋白质作为土壤污染评价指标的优势,重点比较了不同土壤蛋白质提取方法的优劣,结合案例分析了蛋白质作为土壤污染评价指标的可行性及存在的问题,并对土壤宏蛋白质组学的发展进行展望. Soil microbial indicator is one of the important biological indicators in evaluating the extent of soil contamination.In recent years,with the development of molecular biology,many studies have focused on the ecological functions of soil microorganisms by using metagenomics,metatranscriptome and metaproteomics.Relative to metagenomics and metatranscriptome,soil metaproteomics aims to investigate the spatial and temporal changes of the proteins extracted from soil as well as the functional components of soil microbial genomic expression products,which is more conclusive to explore the ecological functions of soil microbes and their roles in soil pollutants transportation and transformation.Therefore,soil metaproteomics has great potential in soil pollution assessment.Currently,soil metaproteomics is still at its infancy stage,while soil protein extraction method is one of the key factors restraining the potential application of soil metaproteomics.In this paper,the advantages and disadvantage of soil metaproteomics in soil pollution assessment were reviewed,with the focus on the comparison of different soil protein extraction methods.In combining with case studies,the feasibility and limits of soil proteins as an indicator for soil pollution assessment were analyzed.In addition,the future research perspectives on the development of soil metaproteomics were discussed.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期2923-2930,共8页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家自然科学青年基金项目(21007055) 中国博士后科学基金项目(20100471714 201104718)资助
关键词 土壤污染 土壤微生物 宏蛋白质组学 土壤蛋白质提取方法 soil pollution soil microbe metaproteomics soil protein extraction method.
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1ZhouD-M(周东美),WangS-Q(王慎强),ChenH-M(陈怀满).Interaction of organic pollutants andheavy metal in soil.土壤与环境,2000,9(2):143-145.
  • 2Elliot ET. The potential use of soil biotic activity as an indicator of productivity, sustainability, and pollution/z Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, eds. Soil Bi- ota: Management in Sustainable Farming Systems. East Melbourne : CSIRO Publications, 1994 : 250-256.
  • 3Filip Z. International approach to assessing soil quality by ecologically-related biological parameters. Agricul- ture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2002, 88:169-174.
  • 4Bastida F, Zsolnay A, Hern6ndez T, et al. Past, pres- ent and future of soil quality indices: A biological per- spective. Geoderma, 2008, 147:159-171.
  • 5Yakovchenko V, Sikora LJ, Kaufman DD. A biological- ly based indicator of soil quality. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1996, 21:245-251.
  • 6王江,张崇邦,常杰,柯世省,张磊.五节芒对重金属污染土壤微生物生物量和呼吸的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(8):1835-1840. 被引量:17
  • 7Visser S, Parkinson D. Soil biological criteria as indica- tors of soil quality: Soil microorganisms. American Jour- nal of Alternative Agriculture, 1992, 7 : 33-37.
  • 8Zelles L. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and li- popolysaccharides in the characterisation of microbial communities in soil: A review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 29:111-129.
  • 9郑昭佩,刘作新.土壤质量及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):131-134. 被引量:189
  • 10Ogunseitan O, Nannipieri P, Smalla K. Soil pro- teomics : Extraction and analysis of proteins from soils// Nannipieri P, Smalla K, eds. Nucleic Acids and Pro- teins in Soil. Berlin : Springer, 2006 : 95-115.

二级参考文献63

  • 1孙健,铁柏清,秦普丰,青山勋,罗荣.铅锌矿区土壤和植物重金属污染调查分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2006,15(2):63-67. 被引量:53
  • 2任立民,刘鹏,郑启恩,张新成,程正新.广西大新县锰矿区植物重金属污染的调查研究[J].亚热带植物科学,2006,35(3):5-8. 被引量:31
  • 3张彦,张惠文,苏振成,张成刚.长期重金属胁迫对农田土壤微生物生物量、活性和种群的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(7):1491-1497. 被引量:36
  • 4[1]Augustsson KA, Rundgren S. 1998. The advantages and disadvantages of Cognettia sphagnetorum in risk evaluation. Ambio, 27(1):61~68
  • 5[2]Baer SG, Rice CW, Blair JM. 2000. Assessment of soil quality in fields with short and long term enrollment in the CRP. J Soil Water Conser,(2): 142~146
  • 6[15]Jordan D, Kremer RJ, Bergfield WA,et al. 1995. Evaluation of microbial methods as potential indicators of soil quality in historical agricultural fields.Biol Ferti Soils, 19(4):297~302
  • 7[16]Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW,et al. 1997. Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial).J Soil Sci Soc Amer,61:4~10
  • 8[17]Karlen DL, Gardner JC, Rosek MJ. 1998. A soil quality framework for evaluating the impact of CRP.J Produc Agric,11(1): 56~60
  • 9[18]Kinako PDS. 1983. Assessment of relative soil quality by ecological bioassay.Afric J Ecol,21(4):291~295
  • 10[19]Lal R. 1998. Soil quality changes under continuous cropping for seventeen seasons of an alfisol in Western Nigeria.Land Degrad Develop,9(3): 259~274

共引文献204

同被引文献56

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部