期刊文献+

中国人弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤新分类模型的预后分析 被引量:15

The clinical significance of a new classification algorithm in Chinese DLBCL cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中国人弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(Diffuselarge B-cell lymphoma,DLBCL)的临床病理学、免疫表型特点及其与临床预后之间的关系;分析Hans及Chan分类模型对DLBCL患者的预后意义,寻找能够提示预后和指导临床治疗的最适合国人DLBCL的分类模型。方法对181例DLBCL患者病理组织石蜡切片进行免疫组化染色,检测Ki-67、CD3、CD20、CD79a、Bcl-6、CD10、Mum.1、GCETl、FOXPl的表达。并根据蛋白水平检测结果使用Hans模型及Chan模型进行分组并结合临床数据进行分析。结果181例患者中,男女比例为1.26:1。平均年龄53.5岁,中位年龄57(2~85)岁。181例患者中61例(33.7%)累及淋巴结,120例结外患者中以胃肠道最为多见(43例,35.8%)。随访时间1~120个月,3年生存率为49.7%,18个月内为患者死亡高发时间。R.CHOP(利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松)方案化疗组患者3年生存率为76.9%,明显优于单纯使用CHOP方案的患者(61.9%)(P=0.017)。Ki-67、CD3、CD20、CD79a的阳性率分别为96.4%、0、98.3%和80.5%。GCETl、CD10、Bcl-6、Mum-1、FOXPl在DLBCL患者中均有一定的表达,但与预后均无明显相关性(P〉0.05)。Hans模型分组,生发中心B细胞样(GCB)组78例,Non—GCB组103例,生存分析显示两组预后差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);Chan模型分组,GCB组68例,Non.GCB组113例,生存分析显示GCB组患者预后明显好于Non—GCB组(P〈0.05)。结论中国人DLBCL流行病学特点、临床病理学特点与西方人群基本一致。Chan模型可用于国人DLBCL的预后提示。 Objective To investigate the clinieopathologic features, pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria and the relationship between different classification models and prognosis in Chinese patients with DLBCL, and try to look for the most appropriate classification model to predict clinical prognosis and therapeutic re- sponses for Chinese patients with DLBCL. Methods 181 cases of Chinese DLBCLs diagnosed according to the WHO 2008 classification were collected. Standard two-step Envision method of immunohistochemical stai- ning was used to assess the expressions of CD20, CD3e, CD79a, CDIO, Mum-1, Bel-6, GCET-1, FOXP1 and Ki-67. The phenotypic classifications were assessed according to the standard of Hans model and Chan model. Data were analyzed by X2 test and Life Table survival analysis with the SPSS14.0 statistical package. Results The ratio of male to female in this cohort was 1.26: 1. The median age of all patients was 57 yrs with the average age of 53.5 yrs. Of 61 cases (33.7%) primarily showed lymph node involvement. Gastroin- testinal tract as the most involved extra-nodal organ was observed in 43 cases ( 35.8% ). All patients with complete clinical follow-up materials survived from 1 - 120 months. The patients showed a high risk for death in the initial one and half years. Three year survival rate was 49.7% (90/181). Three year survival of 44 ca- ses received R-CHOP (Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bolus) was 76.9% (20/ 26), whereas 61.9%, (60/97) in 119 cases received CHOP alone, R-CHOP group showed better prognosis (P =0. 017). All cases expressed one or more pan B cell markers, such as CD20 (176/179, 98.3% ) and CD79a (62/77, 80.5% ). For Hans model, 78 cases were classified as GCB group, while 103 cases as Non- GCB group. The ratio of Non-GCB to GCB was 1.32 without difference on the survival ( P 〉 0.05 ). For the Chan's algorithm, 68 cases belonged to GCB subgroup, while 113 cases non-GCB subgroup. The ratio of non-GCB to GCB was 1.66. GCB subtype showed much better prognosis than non-GCB subtype according to Life Table survival analysis ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The epidemiology and clinicopathologic features of Chinese DLBCLs were similarly with the western cases. Chan' s algorithm was a significant tool to predict the cell origin and clinical biology of Chinese DLBCLs.
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期801-804,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
关键词 淋巴瘤 大细胞 弥漫性 Hans模型 Chan模型 预后 Lymphoma, large cell, diffuse Hans model Chan' s algorithm Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Stein H, CHAN JKC, Wamke RA, et al. World Heahh Organization Classification of Tumor of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. France: IARC Press Lyon,2008: 233-244.
  • 2Choi WW, Montes-Moreno S, Chan WC, et al. A new immunostain algorithm improves the classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma into prognositicaly significant subgroups. Clin Cancer Res, 2009,15 : 5494-5502.
  • 3Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature, 2000, 403: 503-511.
  • 4Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan WC, et al. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large- B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med, 2002,346: 1937-1946.
  • 5Lossos IS, Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, et al. Ongoing immunoglobulin somatic mutation in germinal center B cell-like but not in activated B celMike diffuse large cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2000,97 : 10209-10213.
  • 6Colomo L, Lopez-Guillermo A, Perales M, et al. Clinical impact of the differentiation profile assessed by immunophenotyping in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood, 2003, 101 : 78- 84.
  • 7Linderoth J, Jerkeman M, Cavallin-stahl E, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of CD23 and CD40 may identify prognostically favorable subgroups of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a nordic lymphoma group study. Clin Cancer Res, 2003, 9:722-728.
  • 8Banham AH, Connors JM, Brown PJ, et al. Expression of the FOXP1 transcription factor is strongly associated with inferior survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11:1065-1072.
  • 9Berglund M, Thunberg U, Amini RM, et al. Evaluation of immunophenotype in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and its impact on prognosis. Mod Pathol, 2005,18 : 1113-1120.
  • 10Veelken H, Vik Dannheim S, Schuhe Moenting J, et al. Immunophenotype as prognostic factor for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients undergoing clinical risk-adapted therapy. Ann Oncol, 2007, 18: 931-939.

二级参考文献17

  • 1吴宏菊,张清媛,陈德发,关小军,张伯龙,马军.美罗华联合CHOP方案与CHOP方案治疗初治弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床对比研究[J].癌症,2005,24(12):1498-1502. 被引量:33
  • 2Stain H, Warnke RA, Chan WC, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified//Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon: IARC Pres, 2008, 233-237.
  • 3Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood, 2004, 103: 275-282.
  • 4Muris JJ, Meijer CJ, Vos W, et al. Immunohistochemical profiling based on Bcl-2, CD10 and MUMl expression improves risk stratification in patients with primary nodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma. J Pathol, 2006, 208: 714-723.
  • 5Kramer MH, Hermans J, Wijburg E, et al. Clinical relevance of bcl-2, bcl-6, and MYC rearrangements in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma. Blood, 1998, 92: 3152-3162.
  • 6Rantanen S, Monni O, Joensuu H et al. Causes and consequences of bcl-2 overexpression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma, 2001, 42: 1089-1098.
  • 7Mounier N, Briere J, Gisselbrecht C, et al. Rituximah plus CHOP (R-CHOP) overcomes bcl-2 -associated resistance to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Blood, 2003, 101: 4279--4784.
  • 8Wilson KS, Sehn LH, Berry B, et al. CHOP-R therapy overcomes the adverse prognostic influence of bc1-2 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma, 2007, 48:1102-1109.
  • 9Forero A, Lobuglio AF. History of antibody therapy for non- Hodgkin lymphoma. Semin Oncol, 2003, 30:1-5.
  • 10Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature, 403:503-511.

共引文献4

同被引文献136

  • 1Angelo Zullo,Cesare Hassan,Francesca Cristofari,Francesco Perri,Sergio Morini.Gastric low-grade mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue-lymphoma: Helicobacter pylori and beyond[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2010,2(4):181-186. 被引量:21
  • 2王彦华,蔡华,翁香勤,孙婉玲,李大启.CHOP方案单用或联合美罗华治疗48例弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的随机对照临床研究[J].中国综合临床,2006,22(11):1030-1032. 被引量:17
  • 3Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood, 2004, 103: 275-282.
  • 4Banham AH, Connors JM, Brown P J, et al. Expression of the FOXP1 transcription factor is strongly associated with inferior survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11: 1065-1072.
  • 5Berglund M, Thunberg U, Amini RM, et al. Evaluation of immu- nophenotype in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and its impact on prognosis. Mod Pathol, 2005, 18: 1113-1120.
  • 6Veelken H, Vik Dannheim S, Schulte mounting J, et al. Immunophenotype as prognostic factor for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients undergoing clinical risk-adapted therapy. Ann Oncol, 2007, 18: 931-939.
  • 7Choi WW, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, et al. A new immunostain algorithm classifies diffuse large B-cell lymphoma into molecular subtypes with high accuracy. Clin Cancer Res, 2009, 15: 5494-5502.
  • 8Oh YH, Park CK. Prognostic evaluation of nodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma by immunohistochemical profiles with emphasis on CD 138 expression as a poor prognostic factor. J Korean Med Sci, 2006; 21: 397-405.
  • 9Shiozawa E, Yamochi-Onizuka T, Takimoto M, et al. The GCB subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is less frequent in Asian countries. Leuk Res, 2007, 31: 1579-1583.
  • 10van Imhoff GW, Boerma EJ, van der Holt B, et al. Prognostic impact of germinal center-associated proteins and chromosomal breakpoints in poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006.24: 4135-4142.

引证文献15

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部