摘要
目的探讨不同采血方法在血常规相关检验中的应用价值。方法笔者所在医院进行体检的健康人员90例,随机分为静脉组和末梢组各45例。分别采集静脉血和末梢血进行血常规检查,比较两组人员血常规检查中的白细胞计数、红细胞计数、红细胞比容、血红蛋白、平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度以及血小板等检查项目。结果静脉组45例患者的血常规检查结果为,WBC:(5.24±3.16)×109/L;RBC:(3.34±0.98)×1012/L;HCT:(42.35±20.46)%;HGB:(115.75±15.76)g/L;MCHC:(319.78±28.79)g/L;PLT:(228.75±84.78)×109/L。末梢组45例患者的血常规检查结果为,WBC:(5.86±3.18)×109/L;RBC:(3.86±0.87)×1012/L;HCT:(31.46±21.48)%;HGB:(101.56±16.48)g/L;MCHC:(322.43±28.94)g/L;PLT:(213.48±81.46)×109/L。两组患者的MCHC检查结果相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而WBC、RBC、HCT、HGB、PLT的检查结果相比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论不同的采血方法对血常规的检验结果具有很大的影响,应用静脉血代替末梢血可以有效的提高检验结果的准确性、提高仪器设备的使用寿命,值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective To investigate the value of different blood sampling methods in routine inspection.Methods 90 cases of health person were randomly divided into two groups,45 cases in each group.Respectively collecting venous blood and peripheral blood routine examination,were compared between the two groups' blood routine examination of white blood cell count,red cell count,hematocrit,hemoglobin,mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and platelet examination project.Results The blood routine examination results of vein group were WBC(5.24±3.16)× 10 9 /L;RBC(3.34 ± 0.98) ×10 12 /L;HCT(42.35±20.46)%;HGB(115.75 ±15.76)g/L;MCHC(319.78±28.79)g/L;PLT(228.75±84.78)×10 9 /L.Terminal group were WBC(5.86±3.18)×10 9 /L;RBC(3.86±0.87)×10 12 /L;HCT(31.46±21.48)%;HGB(101.56±16.48)g/L;MCHC(322.43±28.94)g/L;PLT(213.48±81.46)×10 9 /L.2 groups of patients with MCHC were compared,the difference was not statistically significant(P 0.05),while WBC,RBC,HCT,HGB,PLT were compared,the difference was statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion Different blood sampling methods on blood routine examination results have a great impact,application of venous blood instead of peripheral blood can effectively improve the accuracy of test results,improve the equipment service life,worthy of clinical use of promotion.
出处
《中国医药科学》
2012年第16期111-112,共2页
China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词
血常规
静脉血
末梢血
Routine blood
Venous blood
Peripheral blood