期刊文献+

经椎间孔椎间融合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎不稳 被引量:13

Transforaminal interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar spine instability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经椎间孔椎间融合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗在腰椎不稳的疗效和影响因素。方法经后外侧小切口单侧椎弓根固定加经椎间孔椎间融合治疗73例腰椎不稳患者。采用JOA评分、观测影像学改变及植骨融合率评价疗效,并对影响疗效的相关因素进行分析。结果 73例均获得随访,时间16~38个月。JOA评分:术前为(10.24±3.68)分,术后3个月为(20.18±3.89)分、术后2年为(20.83±4.01)分,与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。其中优29例,良22例,中17例,差5例,优良率为69.9%。椎间隙高度:术前为(5.83±1.71)mm,术后3个月为(9.45±1.36)mm、术后2年为(8.96±1.28)mm,与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患者术后3个月、2年的节段活动度、矢状滑移距离均低于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。植骨融合率为87%。结论单侧椎弓根固定加经椎间孔椎间融合术能够恢复脊柱的稳定性,重建腰椎生理前凸,并能改善腰椎生物力学环境及恢复椎间隙高度。年龄<60岁、病程<24个月的患者手术治疗效果较好。 Objective To study the effect of transforaminal interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar spine instability. Methods 73 lumbar instability cases were treated with posterolateral incision unilateral pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. JOA score,imaging changes, implantation fusion rate and related factors of influencing efficacy were recorded, and the results were statistically com- pared. Results All patients were followed up for 16 -38 months. JOA scores were (10.24 ±3.68), (20. 18 ± 3.89), and (20. 83 ± 4. 01 ) in preoperation, 3 months, and 2 years after surgery (P 〈 0. 05 ). Patients JOA scores were 29 cases excellent,22 good,17 fair and 5 poor. The excellent and good rate was 69.9%. Intervertebral space height was (5.83 ± 1.71 ) ram, (9.45 ± 1.36 )mm and ( 8.96 ± 1.28 )mm in preoperation, 3 months, and 2 years after surgery(P 〈 0. 05 ). Segmental mobility, sagittal slip distance in 3 months, and 2 years after surgery were lower than preoperation (P 〈 0. 05). The implantation fusion rate was 87%. Conclusions Through small lateral incision after unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with percutaneous transforaminal interbody fusion can restore stability of the spinal column, reconstruction of lumbar lordosis, and can improve lumbar biomechanical environment and restore the height of intervertebral space. When patients age is 〈 60 years and the disease course is 〈 24 months, the operation therapeutic effect is better.
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2012年第5期495-498,共4页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 椎弓根螺钉 椎间融合 腰椎不稳 pedicle screw vertebral arch fusion lumbar instability
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Jim6nez-Avila J M, Garcta-Valencia J, Bitar-Alatorre W E. Risk factors affecting fusion in the treatment of lumbar spine instability [J]. Acta Orthop Mex,2011,25(3) :156 -160.
  • 2Suk S I, Lee C K, Kim W J, et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter- body fusion to pediele-erew fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression inspondylolytie spondyiolisthesis [ J ]. Spine, 1997, 22(2) :210 -229.
  • 3曹知贫,何辉,梁振扬,朱元.椎弓根螺钉复位固定加不同融合方式治疗腰椎滑脱症疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2009,12(1):9-12. 被引量:23
  • 4卢政好,李平元,苏晓桃,欧军,谭健.USS钉棒系统内固定结合椎体间植骨融合术治疗退行性腰椎不稳症[J].临床骨科杂志,2011,14(3):260-263. 被引量:14
  • 5Bonaldi G. Minimally invasive dynamic stabilization of the degener- ated lumbar spine [ J ]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2010,20 ( 2 ) : 229 - 241.
  • 6Endres S, Aigner R, Wilke A. Instrumented intervertebral or pos- terolateral fusion in elderly patients clinical results of a single cen-ter [ J ]. B MC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011,12 ( 1 ) : 189.
  • 7Kirkaldy-Willis W H, Farfan H F. Instability of the lumbar spine [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1952 ( 165 ) : 110 - 123.
  • 8Kasai Y, Morishita K, Kawakita E,et al. A new evaluation meth- od for lumbar spinal instability: passive lumbar extension test [ J ]. Phys Ther, 2006,86(12) : 1661 - 1667.
  • 9Poh S Y, Yue W M, Chen L T, et al. Two-year outcomes of trans- foraminal lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. J Orthop Surg ( Hong Kong), 2011,19(2) :135 -140.

二级参考文献18

  • 1张强,邹德威,马华松,海涌.后路斜向腰椎关节固定术治疗腰椎退行性不稳[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(11):814-816. 被引量:14
  • 2Fairbank J C, Pynsent P B. The Oswestry disability index [ J ]. Spine, 2000, 25 ( 22 ) : 2940 - 2952.
  • 3Suk S, Lee C K, Kim W J, et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter-body fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posteriolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Spine, 1997, 22(2) : 210 -220.
  • 4Crawford N R, Cagli S, Sonntag V H, et al. Biomechanics of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Part 1: In vitro model [J]. J Neurosurg, 2001, 94(1 Suppl) : 45 -50.
  • 5Cagli S, Crawford N R, Sonntag V H, et al. Biomechanics of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Part 2: treatment with threaded interbody cage/dowels and pedicle screws [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 2001, 94( 1 Suppl) : 51 -60.
  • 6Madan S, Boeree N R. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis [J]. Spine, 2002, 27( 14): 1536-1542.
  • 7Antonio L, Giuseppe G, Victor N, el al. Lumbar interverlebral instability : a review [ J ]. Radiology, 2007,245 ( 1 ) : 62 - 77.
  • 8Epstein N E, Silvergleide R S, Black K. Computed tomography validating bony ingrowth into fibula strut allograft:a criterion for fusion [ J ]. Spine J,2002,2 ( 2 ) : 129 - 133.
  • 9Garfin S R,Rausehing W. Spinal stenosis[ J ]. Inslr Course Lect, 2001,50:145 - 152.
  • 10Madan S,Boeree N R. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolitbesis [J]. Spine,2002,27(14):1536-1542.

共引文献34

同被引文献101

引证文献13

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部