期刊文献+

论侵害人格权之获益返还——兼论《侵权责任法》第20条的适用 被引量:1

On the infringement of personality right benefit return——Concurrently on the “tort liability law”article twentieth applicable
下载PDF
导出
摘要 侵害他人人格权获得利润,本为现今之普遍现象。但是如何处置此种不当获益,乃民法上之重大课题。我国《侵权责任法》第20条对此设有较为周全之规定,但未言明该请求权之性质,对其适用恐嫌不妥。因此,以批判的观点检讨现行立法及学说的规定,认为其实质上是不法管理制度,并认为其适用范围仅限于人格权受侵害之财产损失,不及于精神损害。同时明确其构成要件和法律效果,明确其与侵权损害赔偿请求权及权益侵害不当得利请求权的关系,至为关键。 Infringes on the personality right a profit, this is the common phenomenon today. But that how to take a benefit in inappropriate is a major subject in civil law. Article 20 the tort law in our country has more comprehensive regulation, but did not tell the nature of the claim, applicable to the terrorists with suspicion. Therefore, in view of the present legislation critical review and the provisions of the theory, the author thinks that the but illegal management system, and that the scope is limited to the personality rights violated the property, inferior to the mental damage and clear its constituents and legal effect, make clear its and infringement claim for damages and rights violations undeserved benefit claims, the relation between the crucial.
作者 王辉
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2012年第5期91-95,共5页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 获利返还 财产损失 精神损害 不法管理 profit return property damage mental injury illegal management
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献73

  • 1[德]迪特尔·梅迪库斯.德国债法分论[M].杜景林,卢谌,译.北京:法律出版社,2007.
  • 2程啸.侵权行为法总论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
  • 3薛波.元照英关法词典[K].北京:法律出版社,2003:896.
  • 4张俊浩.民法学原理下册(修订第三版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:945.
  • 5[日]北川善太郎.民法讲要Ⅳ债权各论(第3版)[M].东京:有斐阁,2003:210-212.
  • 6Douglas Laycock, Modern American Remedies, Cases and materials [M]. third edition, 北京:中信出版社(影印本),2003:565.
  • 7[日]木下毅.日米比较原状回复法序说[C]//.四宫和夫先生古稀纪念论文集:民法·信托法理论的展开.东京:弘文堂,1986:127.
  • 8《德国民法典》第687条第2项.
  • 9台湾地区“民法典”第177条第2项.
  • 10[日]内田贵.《民法Ⅱ债权各沦》,第516页.

共引文献147

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部