摘要
侵害他人人格权获得利润,本为现今之普遍现象。但是如何处置此种不当获益,乃民法上之重大课题。我国《侵权责任法》第20条对此设有较为周全之规定,但未言明该请求权之性质,对其适用恐嫌不妥。因此,以批判的观点检讨现行立法及学说的规定,认为其实质上是不法管理制度,并认为其适用范围仅限于人格权受侵害之财产损失,不及于精神损害。同时明确其构成要件和法律效果,明确其与侵权损害赔偿请求权及权益侵害不当得利请求权的关系,至为关键。
Infringes on the personality right a profit, this is the common phenomenon today. But that how to take a benefit in inappropriate is a major subject in civil law. Article 20 the tort law in our country has more comprehensive regulation, but did not tell the nature of the claim, applicable to the terrorists with suspicion. Therefore, in view of the present legislation critical review and the provisions of the theory, the author thinks that the but illegal management system, and that the scope is limited to the personality rights violated the property, inferior to the mental damage and clear its constituents and legal effect, make clear its and infringement claim for damages and rights violations undeserved benefit claims, the relation between the crucial.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2012年第5期91-95,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
获利返还
财产损失
精神损害
不法管理
profit return
property damage
mental injury
illegal management