期刊文献+

股骨近端锁定钢板与动力髋螺钉治疗转子间骨折的分析 被引量:3

Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture by proximal femoral locking plate or dynamic hip screw
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较股骨近端锁定钢板与动力髋螺钉(DHS)治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床效果。方法收集2007年6月~2010年12月来我院就诊的股骨转子间骨折的患者87例,随机分成两组,分别采用股骨近端锁定钢板(47例)和DHS(40例)治疗,比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血、骨折愈合时间、髋关节功能Harris评分及术后并发症。结果 87例患者均获得随访,平均随访时间为11.6个月。两组患者在手术时间上无明显差异(P>0.05),但近端锁定钢板组术中出血多于DHS组(P<0.01);两组患者骨折愈合时间及Harris评分无统计学差异(P>0.05);近端锁定钢板组出现2例锁定螺钉进入髋关节的并发症,DHS组出现1例髋内翻、1例头钉拔出。结论股骨近端锁定钢板治疗转子间骨折临床效果与DHS相似,是一种较为理想的手术方式。 Objective To make the comparison of clinical effects between proximal femoral locking plate and dynamic hip screw(DHS) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.Methods From June 2007 to December 2010,87 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were treated in our hospital.They were randomly divided into two groups and received the treatment by proximal femoral locking plate(47 cases) or DHS(40 cases),respectively.Comparison was made in the operation time,blood loss during the operation,healing time,Harris score,and postoperative complications between the two groups.Results All these patients were followed up with the average time of 11.6 months.There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups(P0.05).But the blood loss during the operation in patients receiving the proximal femoral locking plate was significantly higher than that in those receiving DHS(P0.01).There was no significant difference in healing time and Harris scores between the two groups(P0.05).Among the patients receiving proximal femoral locking plate,the complication of screw coming into hip joint occurred in one case.Among those receiving DHS,coxa vara and extraction of the screw did in one,respectively.Conclusion The clinical effect of treatment by proximal femoral locking plate is similar to that by DHS.This treatment is also a desirable surgical method.
作者 吴吉林
出处 《西南国防医药》 CAS 2012年第10期1074-1077,共4页 Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
关键词 转子间骨折 股骨近端锁定钢板 动力髋螺钉 intertrochanteric fracture proximal femoral locking plate dynamic hip screw
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张保中,邱贵兴.高龄股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(8):582-584. 被引量:133
  • 2Jensen J S, Miehaelsen M. Trochanteric femoral fractures treated with Mclaughlin osteosynthesis [ J ]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1975,46 (6) :795 - 803.
  • 3Finsen V,Johnsen L G,Tran G, et al. Hip fracture incidence in central Norway: a follow up study [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004,419:173 - 178.
  • 4Nieves J W, Bilezikian J P, Lane J M, et al. Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics [ J ]. Osteoporos Int ,2010,21:399 - 408.
  • 5Perren S M. Evolution and rationale of locked internal fixator technology introductory remarks [ J ]. Injury, 2001, 32 ( Suppl 2) :B3 - 9.
  • 6Baumgaertner M R, Curtin S L, Lindskog D M, et al. The value of the tip - apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995,77(7) :1058 - 1064.
  • 7刘兴华,王满宜,蒋协远.动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2003,19(2):76-78. 被引量:57
  • 8McMichael J C,Moed B R. Failure of intertrochanteric fixation using a locking plate : a case report [ J ]. Current Orthopaedic Practice, 2009,20(1) :101 - 104.

二级参考文献8

共引文献187

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部