期刊文献+

市场结构、环境税与福利效应分析 被引量:4

An Analysis on the Market Structure,Environmental Taxes and Welfare Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用短期局部均衡分析方法研究完全竞争市场和垄断市场条件下环境税对社会福利的影响。结果显示:在完全竞争市场条件下,对企业征收环境税可以增进社会福利。而在垄断市场条件下,环境税的福利效应具有不确定性,这取决于垄断造成的扭曲程度。如果垄断造成的扭曲较小,环境税仍然可以提高社会福利。但无论是增进抑或降低社会福利,对垄断企业征收环境税都不可能实现最优化,因为环境税在矫正污染外部性的同时,垄断造成产量水平下降导致福利损失增加,所以只能追求一个次优的结果,次优环境税低于完全竞争条件下的标准环境税。 This paper analysis the effects of environmental tax on the social welfare under the conditions of perfectly competitive market and monopolistic market,using Short-term partial equilibrium analysis method.We find,in the perfectly competitive market,imposing environmental tax on enterprises can improve social welfare.But social welfare has uncertainty in the monopolistic market and it is up to the distortion of monopoly.We can sure that environmental tax can improve the social welfare if the distortion of monopoly slight.From the analysis,we can draw a conclusion that we can’t make an optimal choice between environmental tax and social welfare in the monopolistic market.As we all know,imposing environmental tax on enterprises can decrease contamination but also decrease enterprise’s output,and so decrease social welfare.We finally have only a sub-optimal choice that in the monopolistic market,we choose a sub-optimal environmental tax lower than that in the perfectly competitive market.
作者 李正升
出处 《经济与管理》 CSSCI 2012年第10期88-91,共4页 Economy and Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(12XJC790008) 云南省应用基础研究面上项目(2011FZ085)
关键词 完全竞争 垄断 环境税 福利效应 perfectly competitive market monopoly environmental tax welfare effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1James M. Buchanan. External Diseconomies,Corrective Taxes,and Market Structure[J]. The American Economic Review, 1969,59( 1 ) : 174-177.
  • 2Don Fullerton. Six Distribution Effects of Environmental Policy[ J].Risk Analysis, 2011, 31 ( 6 ) :923-929.
  • 3[美]威廉·J·鲍莫尔,华莱士·E·奥茨.环境经济理论与政策[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
  • 4汤吉军.市场结构与环境污染外部性治理[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(3):1-4. 被引量:8
  • 5Wallace E. Oates and Diana L. Strassmann(1984), "Effluent Fees and Market Structure",Journal of Public Eco- nomics, vol.24( 1 ) :29-46.
  • 6Dwight R Lee(1975),"Efficiency of Pollution Tax- ation and Market Structure",Joumal of Environmental Eco- nomics and Management,Vol.2 (1):69-72.
  • 7A. H. Barnett (1980), "The Pigouvian Tax Rule Under Monopoly" , The American Economic Review,Vol.70(5) : 1037-1041.

二级参考文献8

  • 1威廉·鲍莫尔,华莱士·奥茨.环境经济理论与政策设计[M].严旭阳,译.北京:经济科学出版社,2003.
  • 2杰弗里·佩罗夫.中级微观经济学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2009.
  • 3Coase R H. The Problem of Social Cost [J]. Law and Economics, 1960,3:1 -44.
  • 4Gilbert R. Dominant Firm Pricing Policy in a Market for an Exhaustible Resomrce[ J]. Bell Journal of Economics,1978,9(2) :35 -43.
  • 5Pearce D W, Turner R K. Economics of Natural Resources, and the Environment [ M ]. Harvard : John Hopkins University Press, 1990.
  • 6Pindyck R. The Optimal Exploration and Production of Non-Renewable Resources [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1978,86 : 21 - 37.
  • 7Sweeney J L. Economics of Depletable Resources :Market Forces and Intertemporal Bias [ J ]. Review of Economic Studies, 1977, XLIV (1) :192-205.
  • 8阿兰·兰德尔著 施以正译.资源经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1989..

共引文献7

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部