期刊文献+

Comparison of Immune Responses against FMD by a DNA Vaccine Encoding the FMDV/O/IRN/2007 VP1 Gene and the Conventional Inactivated Vaccine in an Animal Model 被引量:2

Comparison of Immune Responses against FMD by a DNA Vaccine Encoding the FMDV/O/IRN/2007 VP1 Gene and the Conventional Inactivated Vaccine in an Animal Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is highly contagious and responsible for huge outbreaks among cloven hoofed animals. The aim of the present study is to evaluate a plasmid DNA immunization system that expresses the FMDV/O/IRN/2007 VP1 gene and compare it with the conventional inactivated vaccine in an animal model. The VP1 gene was sub-cloned into the unique Kpn I and BamH I cloning sites of the pcDNA3.1+ and pEGFP-N1 vectors to construct the VP1 gene cassettes. The transfected BHKT7 cells with sub-cloned pEGFP-N1-VP1 vector expressed GFP-VP1 fusion protein and displayed more green fluorescence spots than the transfected BHKT7 cells with pEGFP-N1 vector, which solely expressed the GFP protein. Six mice groups were respectively immunized by the sub-cloned pcDNA3.1+-VP1 gene cassette as the DNA vaccine, DNA vaccine and PCMV-SPORT-GMCSF vector (as molecular adjuvant) together, conventional vaccine, PBS (as negative control), pcDNA3.1+ vector (as control group) and PCMV-SPORT vector that contained the GMCSF gene (as control group). Significant neutralizing antibody responses were induced in the mice which were immunized using plasmid vectors expressing the VP1 and GMCSF genes together, the DNA vaccine alone and the conventional inactivated vaccine (P<0.05). Co-administration of DNA vaccine and GMCSF gene improved neutralizing antibody response in comparison with administration of the DNA vaccine alone, but this response was the most for the conventional vaccine group. However, induction of humeral immunity response in the conventional vaccine group was more protective than for the DNA vaccine, but T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ concentration were the most in DNA vaccine with the GMCSF gene. Therefore the group that was vaccinated by DNA vaccine with the GMCSF gene, showed protective neutralizing antibody response and the most Th1 cellular immunity. Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is highly contagious and responsible for huge outbreaks among cloven hoofed animals. The aim of the present study is to evaluate a plasmid DNA immunization system that expresses the FMDV/OflRN/2007 VP1 gene and compare it with the conventional inactivated vaccine in an animal model. The VP1 gene was sub-cloned into the unique Kpn I and BamH I cloning sites of the peDNA3.1+ and pEGFP-N1 vectors to construct the VPI gene cassettes. The transfected BHKT7 cells with sub-cloned pEGFP-N1-VP1 vector expressed GFP-VP1 fusion protein and displayed more green fluorescence spots than the transfected BHKT7 cells with pEGFP-N1 vector, which solely expressed the GFP protein. Six mice groups were respectively immunized by the sub-cloned pcDNA3.1+-VP1 gene cassette as the DNA vaccine, DNA vaccine and PCMV-SPORT-GMCSF vector (as molecular adjuvant) together, conventional vaccine, PBS (as negative control), pcDNA3.1+ vector (as control group) and PCMV-SPORT vector that contained the GMCSF gene (as control group). Significant neutralizing antibody responses were induced in the mice which were immunized using plasmid vectors expressing the VP1 and GMCSF genes together, the DNA vaccine alone and the conventional inactivated vaccine (P〈0.05). Co-administration of DNA vaccine and GMCSF gene improved neutralizing antibody response in comparison with administration of the DNA vaccine alone, but this response was the most for the conventional vaccine group. However, induction of humeral immunity response in the conventional vaccine group was more protective than for the DNA vaccine, but T-cell proliferation and IFN-? concentration were the most in DNA vaccine with the GMCSF gene. Therefore the group that was vaccinated by DNA vaccine with the GMCSF gene, showed protective neutralizing antibody response and the most Thl cellular immunity.
出处 《Virologica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第5期286-291,共6页 中国病毒学(英文版)
关键词 DNA疫苗 VP1基因 免疫反应 灭活疫苗 动物模型 GM-CSF基因 基因编码 口蹄疫 DNA vaccine Foot-and-mouth disease virus Immune Response VP 1 gene
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Barteling S J, Vreeswijk J. 1991. Developments in FMD vaccines. Vaccine, 9: 75-87.
  • 2Berzofsky J A, Ahlers J D, Belyakov I M. 2001. Strategies for designing and optimizing new gene ration vaccines. Nat Rev Immunol, 1(3): 209-219.
  • 3CoHen T, Pullen L, Doel T R. 1989. T-cell-dependent inductionof antibody against foot-and-mouth disease virus in a mouse model. J Gen Virol, 70: 395-403.
  • 4Francis M J, Hastings G Z, Syred A D, et al. 1987. Non-responsiveness to a foot-and-mouth disease virus peptide overcomes by addition of foreign helper T-cell determinants. Nature, 330: 168-170.
  • 5Frescura T, Vivoli P. 1973. Studies of the FMD virus sub-types using antigens inactivated by gamma radiations. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B, 20(10): 822-825.
  • 6Grubman M J, Lewis S A, Morgan D O. 1993. Protection of swine against foot-and-mouth disease with viral capsid proteins expressed in heterologous systems. Vaccine, 11: 825-829.
  • 7Guo H, Liu Z, Sun S, et al. 2005. Immune response in guinea pigs vaccinated with DNA vaccine of foot-and-mouth disease virus O/China99. Vaccine, 23 (25): 3236-3242.
  • 8Haratian K, Roustaei M H, Mahravani H, et aL 2000. Neutralizing Antibody Response in Cattle Following Vaccination against Foot-and-Mouth Disease. Arch Razi Ins, 51: 129-132.
  • 9Lv K, Guo Y, Zhang Y, et al. 2009. Transient inhibition of foot-and-mouth disease virus replication by siRNAs silencing VP1 protein coding region. Res Vet S~i, 86 (3): 443-452.
  • 10Kim S A, Liang C M, Cheng I C, et al. 2006. DNA vaccination against foot-and mouth disease via electroporation: stdy of molecular approaches for enhancing VP1 antigenicity. J Gene Med, 8: 1182-1191.

同被引文献31

  • 1靳家声.核酸未来的疫苗[J].中国兽医科技,1996,26(11):40-42. 被引量:4
  • 2Michel M L.Towards immunotherapy for chronichepati- tis B vieus infectiom[J].Vaccine.2002.20(Suppl 4):83- 88.
  • 3Fymn E F, Webster R G,Fuller D H.DNA Vaccines: Protective immunizatiom by Parcnteml, Mucasland Gem-Gun Inoculatiom[J]. PNAS, 1993,90 (24): 11478- 11482.
  • 4Fangliu Yu. Nanoparficle-based adjuvant for enlmmed protective efficacy of DNA vaccine Ag85A-ESAT-6- IL-21 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J]. Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine:2012,8(8):1337-1344.
  • 5Shi Changhong. Therapeutic efficacy of a tuberculosis DNA vaccine encoding heat shock protein 65 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the human interleukin 2 fusion gene[J].Tuberculosis,2008,89(1):54-61.
  • 6Zhou Huaiyu.Protective immune respome against Toxo- plasma gundii elicited by a recombinant DNA vaccine with a novel genetic adjuvant[J].Vaccine,2012,30(10): 1800-1806.
  • 7Kevin R P.haa:unogenicity and protective efficacy of a vaxfectin- adjuvanted tetravalent dengue DNA vac- cine[J].Vaceine,201130(2):336-341.
  • 8Sumit C.En:nced immune response of DNA vaccine (VPI-pCDNA) adsorbed on cationic PLG for foot and mouth disease in guinea pigs[J].Virus Genes,2008,37 (1):81-87.
  • 9Jaradat Z W,Marquardt R R.Studies on the chicken IgY in different sugars,complex carbohydrates and materials [J].Food Agric lmmunol,2000,12(4):263-272.
  • 10Lee K A.Acid stability of anti Helicobacter pylori IgY in aqueous polyolsolution[ J]. JBMB,2002,35 (9):488- 493.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部