期刊文献+

恩度与化疗联合治疗非小细胞肺癌疗效观察 被引量:7

Clinical study of chemotherapy combined with endostar in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨重组人血管内皮抑制素(恩度)联合化疗方案治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效与毒副反应。方法选择NSCLC患者58例,随机分为观察组与对照组各29例,观察组给予恩度联合常规化疗,对照组给予单纯常规化疗,比较两组患者治疗效果与毒副反应。结果所有患者均完成2个周期以上,两组患者近期疗效比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);观察组1年总生存率(58.6%)与1年内肿瘤无进展生存率(20.7%)均显著高于对照组(27.6%,3.4%)(P<0.05),随访至今,观察组肿瘤无进展生存期(PFS)显著高于对照组(P<0.01);两组毒副反应比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论恩度联合化疗方案治疗NSCLC疗效显著且安全性高,且不增加毒副反应发生率。 Objective To discuss the efficacy and safety of rh-endostatin injection (endostar) combined with TP, GP or NP regi- men in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods 58 patients with NSCLC were randomly divided into the endostar combined with routine chemotherapy group ( observation group, n = 29 ) and the routine chemotherapy group ( control group, n = 29 ). Re- suits There was no significant differences in the efficacies and the disease control rate between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). The one-year overall survival time of observation group and control group were 7.2 months and 5.2months, with significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The one-year survival rate (58.6%) and tumor progression-free survival rate within one-year (20.7%) in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group (27.6% , 3.4% ) ( P 〈 0. 05 ). So far, the PFS of observation group was significantly longer than con- trol group(P 〈 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in the toxicity between the two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Endostar combined chemotherapy is effective and safe in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, without increasing the toxicities.
出处 《临床肺科杂志》 2012年第11期2046-2047,共2页 Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 恩度 化疗 NSCLC Endostar Chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献27

共引文献46

同被引文献32

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部