摘要
西欧公社和俄国村社同属于原始公社的"最后阶段或最后时期",但两者的命运和前途却不同:前者在资本主义兴起时期消亡了,后者却在全国范围内保存至今。有人认为俄国村社注定要"自然地死亡"或人为地消灭它,马克思则作出消灭俄国村社不是"前进",而是"后退"的论断。认为可以通过俄国革命挽救村社,使其获得新生而成为俄国社会复兴因素和社会主义的起点。
Western Europe commune and Russia belongs to the village commune with the original "final stage or the last period".However,the fate and the future were different.The former is disappeared in capitalist period and the latter was a nationwide save so far.Some people think that the Russian village community is doomed to "natural death"or man-made destroy it.However,Marx makes the conclusion that destroying the Russian village community is not "forward" but "back".He thought that the village can be saved through the Russian revolution,which makes it become a new Russian society recovery factor and the starting point of the socialism.
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第5期125-127,157,共4页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词
马克思
俄国村社
西欧公社
Marx
Russian village
Western Europe commune