欧美金融监管的最新发展及其启示被引量：3

The Latest Development of Financial Regulations in European Countries and America and Their Implications

下载PDF

导出

摘要金融危机过后,欧美对其金融监管法制进行了重大变革,尤其是在金融集团、信用评级、影子银行和场外金融衍生工具的监管方面。变革后的金融监管法制更加注重对金融创新的原则监管,更加重视金融监管的全球合作,更加凸显金融安全的价值目标取向。作为一个新兴加转轨的经济体,我国一方面要打破对欧美金融监管模式的顶礼膜拜,另一方面要用更加理性务实的态度与开放的心态借鉴欧美金融监管法制变革的经验,处理好金融创新与金融监管的关系,实现金融安全、金融效率与金融公平之间的竞争性平衡。 Upon the current financial crisis,Europe and the Unite States have significantly reformed their financial regulations,especially on the financial groups,credit rating,shadow banking and the OTC financial derivatives.The reformed legal system of financial regulations now focuses on regulation on financial innovation by principles,pays more attention to global cooperation in financial regulation,and highlights the value of financial security.As an emerging and transitional economy,China should break the worship of the European and American model of financial regulations on one hand,and on the other hand should maintain a more rational and pragmatic attitude and an open mind to learn from their experience by means of dealing with financial innovation and financial regulation skillfully,so as to realize competitive balance among financial security,financial efficiency and financial equity.

作者李安安

机构地区武汉大学法学院

出处《北方法学》 CSSCI 2012年第5期149-157,共9页 Northern Legal Science

基金冯果教授主持的武汉大学2011年度"海外人文社会科学研究前沿追踪计划"之子课题"海外金融法前沿问题追踪"的阶段性成果

关键词金融集团影子银行场外金融衍生工具 Financial group Shadow banking OTC financial derivatives

分类号 F832.1 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献55

1Elizabeth F. Brown,E Plaribus Unum-Out of Many, One: Why the United States Needs a Single Financial Services Agency, 14 U. Miami Bus. L. Rev. 1, 6 n. 7 (2005).
2Elizabeth F. Brown, The New Laws and Regulations for Financial Conglomerates: Will They Better Manage the Risks Than the Previous Ones? American University Law Review, June, 2011.
3Fin. Crisis Inquiry C omm' n, The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report xxiii ,41--42, 55 (2011 ) , available at http:// fcic -static. law. stanford. edu/cdn media/fcic -reports/fcic_final_report full. pdf; Bethany McLean & Joe Nocera, All the Devils Are Here, at 40--42, 63--68, 174--76 (2010).
4Dodd-FrankAct, Pub. L. No. 111-203, ξ312, 124 Stat. 1376, 1521-22 (2010) (to be codified at 12 U.S.C.ξ 5412).
5Dodd -Frank Act ξ 617, 124 Stat. 1616 (to be codified at 15 U. S.C. ξ 78q) [eliminating 15 U. S.C. ξ 78q(i) and giving the Federal Reserve the power to regulate securities holding companies].
6Dodd- Frank Act ξ 617, 124 Stat. 1616 (to be codified at 15 U. S.C. ξ 78q).
7Dodd - Frank Act ξ 113, at 1398 (to be codified at 12 U. S.C. ξ 5323).
8Dodd- Frank Act ξ 171(a)(2)(B), at 1436 ( to be codified at 12 U.S.C. ξ 5371).
9Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr. , The Dodd - Frank Act : A Flawed and Inadequate Response to the Too - Big - to - Fail Problem, 89 Oregon L. R. 50-54, 2011, available at http ://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers, cfm? abstract_id = 1719126.
10[美]约翰·C.科菲.《看门人机制:市场中介与公司治理》,黄辉、王长河等译,北京大学出版社2011年版,第2-8页.

二级参考文献36

1李金泽.银行业消费者保护法制与自律机制的国际经验与启示——兼论我国现行制度存在的问题与对策[J].国际金融研究,2004(10):35-43. 被引量：21
2张建伟.法与金融学:路径依赖与金融法变革[J].学术月刊,2005,37(10):96-103. 被引量：18
3申泽波.论金融法的可实施性[J].政法学刊,2006,23(1):14-16. 被引量：1
4《G20伦敦峰会金融监管最新进展》,中国银监会网站,http://www.cbrc.gov.cn/chinese/home/jsp/docView.jsp?docID=20090522CA5BD8FACEF34C7EFF67C69C06E92900.
5《欧盟领导人批准泛欧金融监管改革计划》,http://finance.sina.com.cn/stook/usstock/economics/20090619/21346374748.shtml.
6《Financial Services and Markets Act 2000》 Part Ⅰ, 3 -6.
7Michael Taylor, Twin Peaks : A Regulatory Structure for the New Century, Center for the Study of Financial Innovation, London, (1995).
8邓晓熹.《溯源美国三权分立》[J].科技促进发展,2008,(12).
9North D. , R. Thomas: The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History, Cambridge U.K. and N. Y. : Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
10North D. , B. Weingast : Constitutions and Commitment : The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth- Century England, Journal of Economic History, 1989 (49), PP803 - 832.