期刊文献+

金融监管模式选择:从牵头模式向统一监管模式的过渡 被引量:6

On the Choice of Financial Regulation Pattern: from the Pulling-head Mode to Statistical Regulation Mode
原文传递
导出
摘要 结合74个国家的金融监管模式数据,运用有序多分类logit回归分析方法,构建以金融监管集中程度为因变量,6类影响因素为自变量的金融监管模式选择影响因素模型进行分析,结果表明:中央银行参与金融监管的程度、一国的经济规模以及政府制定、执行和完善政策的能力,对一国金融监管模式选择会产生显著影响;与我国的现实选择不同,自从我国2003年实行分业监管改革以来,随着我国社会经济金融体系的不断深化发展,对实施部分统一监管模式的需求概率值一直很高,统一监管模式的变革趋势日益明显。在我国现有的分业监管体制下,现阶段宜采取牵头式的机构监管和功能监管相结合的综合监管模式,待条件成熟时将监管模式由牵头模式过渡到统一监管模式。 By building the factor model about finance supervision and regulation mode with cause variable for centralize degree and independent variable for 6 kinds affecting factors based on 74 countries" data of order logit regression, the empirical result shows that, the degree of central bank "s involvement in financial supervision, national economic scale and the ability for the government to formulation, implement and improvement the policy has a remarkable effect on the choice of finan- cial regulation pattern. Differing from the practical choice in China, since the implement of separate regulatory reform in 2003, with the further development of social, economic and financial system in China, there is a remarkable trend of reform of unified regulatory pattern. Under the existent sys- tem of separate regulatory, we should take pulling-head consolidated supervision mode combining institution regulation and function regulation at present, and when the condition becomes mature, it can be transformed to unified regulatorv mode.
作者 刘晓星 卢菲
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期31-41,共11页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70973028) 东南大学重大科学研究引导基金资助项目(SKYD20110006)
关键词 金融监管 模式选择 影响因素 有序logit回归 financial regulation mode choice affecting factors order rogit regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1JamesR.Barth.反思银行监管[M].中国金融出版社,2008.
  • 2Goodhart,C. A. E and D. Schonemaker. 1998. In stitutional Separation Between Supervisory, and Mo netary Agencies in The Emerging Framework of Fi nancial Regulation.
  • 3Jose de Luna Martinez and Thomas A. Rose, 2003. International Survey of Integrated Financial SectorSupervision.
  • 4Donato Maseiandaro, 2006. Determinants of Finan- cial Supervision Regimes: Institutions, Politics, Law or Geography?.
  • 5德勤(Deloitte).解读BaselIII-国际金融监管体系改革新动向.国研网,2011.
  • 6P Angelini, L Clerc etc. February 2011. BASEL III: Long-term impact on economic performance and fluctuations. BIS Working paper No. 338.
  • 7陈雨露 马勇.金融业组织形式变迁与金融监管体系选择-全球视角与比较分析.货币金融评论,2008,(6).
  • 8高蕊.比较视角下中国金融监管模式的改革选择[J].河南金融管理干部学院学报,2009,27(2):45-49. 被引量:4
  • 9周逢民.中国金融监管应选择统一综合模式.国研网,2010.
  • 10金俐.关于中央银行金融监管权边界的理论思考[J].金融发展研究,2010(3):8-12. 被引量:9

二级参考文献15

  • 1"2008金融教育回顾与展望座谈会",2008年12月2日.
  • 2中国证监会研究中心.《关于各国金融监管体系的研究报告》第5-11页.
  • 3Nier,Erlend W. Financial Stability Frameworks and the Role of Central Banks : Lessons From the Crisis. IMF Working Paper WP/09/70,2009.
  • 4Cihak, M.and R. Podpiera. Integrated financial supervision:Which model? [J].North American Journal of Economics and Finance ,Vol. 19 ,No. 2,135-152,2008.
  • 5FSA (Financial Services Authority). The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis [R]. 2009.
  • 6G30 (Group of Thirty). Financial Reform: A Framework for Financial Stability[R]. 2009.
  • 7HM Treasury, UK. Reforming Financial Markets[R]. 2009.
  • 8金荦 陶玲.新一轮国际金融监管体制改革的核心强化宏观审慎监管.比较,2009,(4).
  • 9Abrams,R.K.and M.W.Taylor (2001), "Assessing the Vase for Unified Sector Supervision," paper presented at the 2001 Risk Management and Insurance International Conference.
  • 10Briauk,C., (1999), "the Rationale for a single National Financial Services Regulator" ,FSA Occasional Paper.

共引文献20

同被引文献73

引证文献6

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部