期刊文献+

比喻论证、类比论证辨异

The Differentiation of Metaphorical Reasoning and Analogic Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比喻论证和类比论证两种方法长期混同,有必要加以辨析厘清。比喻论证以比喻修辞为前提,在论说文中辅助说理,其功能是生动形象地论证事理,论证形式为异类相比。不同的是类比说理属于形式逻辑范畴,其功能是由已知推论未知,论证形式是同类相比。 Metaphorical reasoning and analogic reasoning are two methods that are easlily confused, so it is necessary to dif- ferentiate the two. Metaphorical reasoning takes metaphor and rhetoric for premise and assists in reasonning in an argumentation. With the argument form of heterogeneous contrast, its function is to vividly demonstrate reasons. Analogic reasoning differs from the former in that it belongs to formal logic and its function is to infer the unknown. Its argumentation form is similar comparison.
作者 付雅辉
机构地区 上海市闵行中学
出处 《现代基础教育研究》 2012年第3期158-161,共4页 Research on Modern Basic Education
关键词 比喻论证 类比论证 说理功能 论证形式 metaphorical reasoning, analogic reasoning, argument function, argumentation form
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部