期刊文献+

语篇构建中的谓词转喻 被引量:2

Predicational metonymy in text construction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为有效、合理地解读隐喻,采用事态场境理论对谓词转喻做了初步探讨,并将谓词转喻分为"潜在性代替现实性"及"一般代替具体"两类。谓词转喻作为一种语用转喻构成了语篇中的语用推理图式,其转喻关系的力度直接影响会话双方的语用推理和语境之间的相互作用。 In order to interpret metonymy effectively and rationally,a study was made of predicational metonymy based on state-of-affairs scenario.Predicational metonymy is generally divided into two types: POTENTIALITY FOR ACTUALITY and GENRAL FOR SPECIFIC. Being pragmatic, predicational meton- ymy constitutes the conceptual schemata of pragmatic inference in text construction and its force direct- ly influences the pragmatic inference as well as the interaction between contexts.
作者 杨小敏
出处 《辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第5期513-515,共3页 Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Social Science Edition)
基金 安徽省教育厅人文社科一般专项资助项目(SK2012B354)
关键词 言语行为 事态场境 谓词转喻 语用推理 语篇构建 speech act state-of-affairs scenario predicatlonal metonymy pragmatic inference text con-struction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Gibbs,R.W.Speaking and Thinking in Metonymy[J]//Pan- ther,K-U&G.Radden(eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought.John Benjamins Publishing Company,1999: 61-76.
  • 2A1-Sharafi,A.G.M.Textual Metonymy:A Semiotic Approach [M].Basingstoke,Hampshire,New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2004:105-107.
  • 3魏在江.语篇转喻综观[J].外语学刊,2007(3):32-37. 被引量:32
  • 4张辉 ,孙明智 .概念转喻的本质、分类和认知运作机制[J].外语与外语教学,2005(3):1-6. 被引量:146
  • 5Panther, K.-U.& Thomberg, L.A cognitive approach to in- fereneing in conversation[J].Journal of Pragrnaties,1998 (30): 755-769.
  • 6Lakoff G.Women,Fire,and Dangerous Things:What Cate- gories Reveal about the Mind[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1987.
  • 7Panther,K.-U.& Thomberg,L.The potentiality for actuali- ty metonymy in English and Hungraian[J]//In Klu- aus-Uwe Panther & Gunter Radden(eds.) Language Arts and Disciplines.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999:337.

二级参考文献50

共引文献170

同被引文献13

  • 1任绍曾.概念隐喻及其语篇体现——对体现概念隐喻的语篇的多维分析[J].外语与外语教学,2006(10):17-21. 被引量:32
  • 2Koller,V.Metaphor clusters,metaphor chains:Analyz- ing the multifunctionality of metaphor in text[J]. Metaphorik de,2003(5):115-134.
  • 3Lakoff, G.& Johnson,M.Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1980:5-6.
  • 4Lakoff, G,The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor JAil/In A.Ortony (ed.).Metaphor and Thought.Cam- bridge:Cambridge University Press,1993: 202-251.
  • 5Sperber,D.& Wilson, D.Relevance:Communication a- nd Cognition [M].Oxford:Blaekwell,1995:206.
  • 6Martinl.R.& White,P.R.R.Language of Evaluation [M].Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan,2005:23.
  • 7Halliday,M.A.K.& Ruqaiya Hasan. Language,Con- text and Text:Aspects of Language in a So- cial-Semiotic Perspective[M].Oxford:Oxford Univer- sity Press,1985:47.
  • 8William Shakespeare Edited By John Dover Wil- son.As You Like It (The Cambridge Dover Wil- son Shakespeare,Vol.3) [M].New York:Cambridge University Press,2009:38.
  • 9Panther,K.-U.&Thornberg,L.The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungraian.In Kluaus-Uwe Panther&Gunter Radden(eds.)Language Arts and Disciplines Amsterdam:John Benjamins.1999:337.
  • 10Hernandez,L.Perez&F.Ruiz de Mendoza.Grounding,semantic motivation and conceptual interaction in indirect speech acts.Journal of Pragmatics,2002(34):259-284.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部