期刊文献+

高度宫颈上皮内瘤变电环切术后复发的预测因素 被引量:17

Predictors for Recurrence of High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia(CIN) after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure(LEEP)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨高度宫颈上皮内瘤变(CINⅡ/Ⅲ)行环形电切除术(LEEP)术后随访的检测方法和复发的危险因素。【方法】回顾性分析2007年1月至2009年1月在我院行LEEP术并且病理诊断为CINⅡ/Ⅲ病例203例。分析术前的液基细胞学(LCT)、高危型HPV DNA,临床病理特征和术后24月随访的LCT、HPV DNA与最终复发的关系。【结果】203例接受LEEP术并保留子宫的患者,在24个月的随访中发现18例复发,复发率为7%。手术病理切缘阳性、宫颈管搔刮阳性与复发相关(P<0.01);术后随访的LCT、高危型HPV DNA预测复发的敏感性、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为72.2%和94.4%、81.6%和86.9%、27.7%和42.5%、97.4%和99.3%,手术前后相同的高危型HPV DNA基因型预测复发的敏感性、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94.1%、95.7%、94.1%和95.7%。与HR-HPV DNA比较,术前术后相同HR-HPV基因型预测LEEP术后复发的敏感性和阴性预测值相似,而特异度和阳性预测值更高。【结论】手术病理切缘阳性和宫颈管搔刮阳性是LEEP术后复发的危险因素,术后随访除LCT和高危型HPV外,手术前后相同HPV基因型是复发的重要预测因素。 [Objective] To investigate the risk factors connected to recurrence of high-grade cervical intraephethial neoplasia (CIN lI/llI ) after loop electrosurgical procedure (LEEP) and evaluate the methods to follow up. [Methods] Analysis was performed with 203 cases who underwent a LEEP and were pathologically confirmed CIN lI / ]U in the Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University from January 2007 to January 2009. Preoperative liquid-based cytological tests (LCT), high-risk HPV DNA (HR-HPV), clinicopathologic features were analyzed. The cases were followed up as long as 24 months after LEEP. LCT, HPV DNA were performed at the sixth, twelfth, eighteenth, and twenty-forth month after LEEP. Colposcopy and biopsy and endocervical curettage (ECC) were performed in case of either of LCT or HR-HPV DNA was positive. All of the cases who were followed up with negative results in LCT and HPV DNA were performed with colposcopy and biopsy and ECC at the 24th month after LEEP. [ Results ] An analysis of 203 patients who underwent a LEEP and pathologically confirmed CIN /Ⅲ were performed. Eighteen patients were proved recurrence in the period of 24 months of follow-up with a recurrent rate of 7.0%. Margin involved and positive ECC were associated with recurrence (P 〈 0.01 ). Patients with margin involved had a recurrent rate of 20.8% while those without had a recurrent rate of 4.7%. Patients with positive ECC had a recurrent rate of 29.1% while those without had 4.7%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in follow up LCT and HR-HPV were 72.2% and 94.4%, 81.6% and 86.9%, 27.7% and 42.5%, 97.4% and 99.3%, respectively. In the same HR-HPV genotype pre- and post-procedure, Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 94.1%, 95.7%, 94.1%, and 95.7%. Compared with HR-HPV DNA, the same HR-HPV type pre- and post-procedure had the equal sensitivity and negative predictive value but higher specificity and positive predictive value. [Conclusions] Margin involved and positive ECC are risk factors for recurrence after LEEP. Besides LCT and HR- HPV DNA, the same HR-HPV genotype pre- and post-procedure is an important predictive factor for recurrence during follow up.
出处 《中山大学学报(医学科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期619-624,共6页 Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University:Medical Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(30872743) 广州市科技计划项目(2010J-E291)
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤样变 环形电切术 乳头瘤病毒 基因分型 复发 预测因素 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) papillomavirus, human genotype recurrence predictive factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1罗招凡,王惠英,彭永排,贾燕午.快速导流杂交法检测人乳头瘤病毒基因分型及其临床意义[J].中国热带医学,2007,7(9):1540-1541. 被引量:19
  • 2Ferenczy A. Management of patients with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [ J ] . Cancer, 1995, 76 (10 Suppl) : 1925-1933.
  • 3Cecchini S, Visi oli CB, Zappa M, et al. Recurrence after treatment by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [J]. Tumori, 2002, 88(6): 478-480.
  • 4彭永排,张莘,陆晓楣,张丙忠,林仲秋.人乳头瘤病毒基因型在宫颈癌、癌前病变及正常宫颈妇女中的分布[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2011,32(6):758-763. 被引量:13
  • 5黄曼妮,吴令英,章文华,李斌,安菊生.高频电刀宫颈环状切除术治疗149例CINⅠ~Ⅱ临床分析[J].癌症进展,2007,5(1):104-107. 被引量:4
  • 6Jeong NH, Lee NW, Kim H J, et al. High-risk human papillomavirus testing for monitoring patients treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2009, 35(4): 706-711.
  • 7Prato B, Ghelardi A, Gadducci A, et al. Correlation of recurrence rates and times with posttreatment human papillomavi-rus status in patients treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2008, 18(1) : 90-94.
  • 8Houfflin Debarge V, Collinet P, Vinatier D, et al. Value of human papillomavims testing after conization by loop electrosurgical excision for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions[J]. Gyneco Oncol, 2003, 90(3): 587-592.
  • 9Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton C J, et al. 2006 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference.2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests [J]. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2007, 11(4) : 201-222.
  • 10Kang WD, Oh M J, Kim SM, et al. Significance of human papillomavirus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure [J]. Am J ObstetGynecol, 2010, 203(1): 72.el-6.

二级参考文献36

  • 1吕晓萍,李体远,戴勇,童秋生,熊峰,李放娟,季卉,许小庄.人乳头状瘤病毒快速导流杂交与传统杂交法比较基因分型及临床应用[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2005,15(6):618-621. 被引量:18
  • 2张学东,何春年.人乳头瘤病毒与子宫颈癌的研究进展[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2006,33(2):113-116. 被引量:19
  • 3[2]Prendiville W,Cullimore J,Noman S.Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ):A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Br J Obstet Gynecol,1989,96:1054
  • 4[3]Herzog TJ,Williams S,Adler LM,et al.Potential of cervical electrosurgical excision procedure for diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Gynecol Oncol,1995,57:286
  • 5[6]Oyesanya OA,Amerasinghe C,Manning EA.A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.Gynecol Oncol,1993,50:84
  • 6[7]Crompton AC,Johnson N.Which is more painful? A randomized trial comparing loop with laser excision of the cervical transformationzone.Gynecol Oncol,1994,52:392
  • 7[8]Coppleson M.Cervical squamous and glandular intraepithelial neoplasia:Clinical feature and review of management.In:Coppleson M,ed.Gynecological Oncology.2nd.Thomas Springfield,1992.572
  • 8[9]Srisomboon J,Tangchaitrong CA,Bhusawang Y,et al.Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.J Med Assoc Thai,1996,79:423
  • 9[12]Ferenczy A.Management of patients with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.Cancer,1995,76:1928
  • 10[13]Widrich T,Kennedy AW,Myers TM,et al.Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix:Management and outcome.Gynecol Oncol,1996,61:304

共引文献33

同被引文献143

引证文献17

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部