期刊文献+

硬膜外阻滞全程分娩镇痛对产妇有效性和新生儿的安全性探讨 被引量:2

Whole-course epidural block for analgesic delivery:efficacy in puerperas and safety in neonates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价全程硬膜外镇痛术对新生儿安全性的影响。方法:收集本院随机分配40例无产科及硬膜外阻滞禁忌证的单胎初产妇,随机分为2组,每组20例。Ⅰ组为常规分娩镇痛组,Ⅱ组为全程分娩镇痛组。对两组产妇行硬膜外阻滞,分别观察子宫收缩情况,总产程,分娩方式,新生儿血气分析,体重及新生儿阿氏评分。结果:Ⅱ组在实施镇痛后30 min时子宫收缩力抑制最明显(P<0.05),但过后可逐渐恢复至正常水平。共5例需行剖宫产,剖宫产产妇的宫缩加强情况与两组中阴道分娩产妇宫缩加强差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),两组的第二、三产程、分娩方式、新生儿阿氏评分、体重、脐静脉血气分析及新生儿转归等比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:分娩全程硬膜外镇痛无延长第二、三产程时间,对新生儿无影响。 Objective:To assess the safety of whole-course epidural analgesia in neonates. Methods: Forty nulliparas in singleton pregnancy who did not have eontraindications for epidural block were enrolled from First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College and were randomly assigned to receive routine analgesic delivery (group I ) and whole-course analgesic delivery (group Ⅱ ), respectively. All primiparas were subjected to epidural block for further comparison on uterine contraction,way of delivery, blood gas analysis of neonates, body weight of neonates and Apgar scores. Results :The uterine contraction was most intensively inhibited in group Ⅱ at 30 minutes after analgesia ( P 〈 0. 05 ) and was subsequently renormalized. Of 5 cases required cesarean resection, the intensified uterine contraction did not differ statistically with those who underwent vaginal delivery ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Additionally, the difference in the duration of the second and third courses, way of delivery, Apgar score for neonates, body weight of neonates, blood gas analysis of umbilical vein and neonatal prognosis did not reach statistical significance ( all P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion : Whole-course epidural block for delivery is associated with neither prolonged second or third course of delivery nor adverse impacts on the neonates.
出处 《广州医学院学报》 2012年第4期23-26,共4页 Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
基金 广东省第二批科技事业计划项目(33项目)(2005B36001020)
关键词 硬膜外阻滞 全程 分娩镇痛 新生儿 epidural block whole-course analgesic delivery neonate
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Alehagen S, Wijma B, Lundberg U, et al. Fear, pain and stress hormonesduring childbirth [ J ]. J Psychosem Obstet Gy-naeco1,2005,26 ( 3 ) : 153-165.
  • 2Eltzschig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR. Regional anest hesia andanalgesia for labor and delivery [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2003,348(20) :319-332~.
  • 3Leighton BL, Halpern AG. The effect s of epidural analgesia on larbor, maternal , and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review [ J ]. AmJ ObstetGynecol, 2002,186 ( 10 ) : S69-S77.
  • 4Marmor TR , Krol DM. Labor pain management in the UnitedStates : understanding patterns and the issue of choice [ J ]. AmJ Ob-stetGynecol, 2002,186 ( 5 ) : S 173-S 180.
  • 5尹春艳,周敬珍,吕小燕,黄小鹏,何桂华,陈建飞.持续硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛的子宫收缩和产程特点[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(11):1563-1567. 被引量:32
  • 6Boselli E, Debon R, Duflo F, et al. Ropivacaine 0.15 % plus sufentanil0. 5 microg/mL anol ropivacaine 0. 1% plus sufentanil 0. 5 microg/mlare equivalent for patienct- controlled ep idural analgesiag duringlabor [ J ]. Anesth Analg,2003,96 (F) :1173-1177.
  • 7范永利,赵砚丽,高瑞珍,赵鹤龄,孙春荣,秦英,陈伯銮.罗哌卡因复合芬太尼用于产妇自控硬膜外分娩镇痛的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(11):659-662. 被引量:86
  • 8金沐,孙来保,谭洁芳,黄文起,陈秉学.罗比卡因在分娩镇痛中的应用[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2001,28(3):148-151. 被引量:28
  • 9孙大金,杭燕南.实用麻醉学[M].上海:中国医药科技出版社,2001:96-99.
  • 10耿志宇,吴新民,陆辉,张红芹,李昆鹏,刘石磊.产妇分娩时舒芬太尼或芬太尼混合罗哌卡因病人自控硬膜外镇痛的效应[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(8):677-680. 被引量:26

二级参考文献51

  • 1李淑敏,糜若然.分娩镇痛的临床研究进展[J].医学综述,2005,11(5):465-467. 被引量:12
  • 2张义长,崔晓岗,翟伟.硬膜外阻滞作分娩镇痛对分娩结局的影响[J].国外医学(妇幼保健分册),2005,16(6):350-351. 被引量:9
  • 3陈自励,何锐智,彭倩,郭可瑜,张玉琼,袁惠华.脐动脉血气在新生儿窒息诊断中的意义和价值[J].中华围产医学杂志,2006,9(1):24-27. 被引量:59
  • 4耿志宇,吴新民,陆辉,张红芹,李昆鹏,刘石磊.产妇分娩时舒芬太尼或芬太尼混合罗哌卡因病人自控硬膜外镇痛的效应[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(8):677-680. 被引量:26
  • 5Monk JP, Beresford R, Ward A. Sufentanil. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs, 1988, 36:286-313.
  • 6Herman NL, Sheu KL, Van Decar TK, et al. Determination of the analgesic dose-response relation for epidural fentanyl and sufentanil with bupivacaine 0.125% in laboring patients. J Clin Anaesth, 1998, 10:670-677.
  • 7Rolfseng OK, Skogvoll E, Borchgrevink PC. Epidural bupivacaine with sufentanil or fentanyl during labor: a randomized, double-blind study.Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2002, 19: 812-818.
  • 8Connelly NR, Parker RK, Vallurupalli V, et al. Comparison of epidural fentanyl versus sufentanil for analgesia in ambulatory patients in early labor. Anesth Analg, 2000, 91:374-378.
  • 9Le Guen H, Roy D, Branger B, et al. Comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in combination with bupivacaine for patient controlled epidural analgesia during labor. J Clin Anesth, 2001, 13: 98-102.
  • 10Lang E, Kaplia A, Shlugman D, et al. Reduction of isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration by remifentanil. Anesthesiology, 1996, 85: 721-728.

共引文献190

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部