期刊文献+

牙槽嵴裂隙间固定对腭裂上颌复合体内置式牵引成骨生物力学的影响 被引量:3

Three-dimensional finite element analysis for internal maxillary distraction with fixation between cleftpalate
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨裂隙间固定对唇腭裂上颌复合体牵引成骨生物力学的影响。方法采用三维有限元方法,建立唇腭裂上颌复合体LeFortⅠ型截骨骨块及相应软组织有限元模型,在保留牙槽嵴裂隙与裂隙两侧钛板固定两种情况下,模拟临床上内置式牵引方式,使截骨块上牵引器固位点沿牵引方向前移10mm,比较分析其生物力学变化。结果唇腭裂上颌复合体LeFortⅠ型截骨内置式牵引下,腭部出现压缩现象,而裂隙两侧钛板固定腭部压缩现象不明显。矢向位移与垂直向位移在两种工况下比较,位移方向及大小与保留裂隙的前牵引无明显差异。结论裂隙间固定后唇腭裂上颌复合体内置式牵引成骨,可以避免腭部出现压缩现象,有生物力学指导意义。 Objective To investigate the biomechanical changes of internal maxillary distraction with fixation between cleft palate. Methods Three-dimensional FEM models of I.eFort I osteotomy and soft tissue in CLP maxillary complex were established. Two different conditions were simulated: one was the cleft palate connected by a titanium plate, and the other was the cleft retained. Internal midface distraction which applied in clinic were simulated. Fixation points of the distraction devices on the LeFort I osteotomy complex were advanced by 10 mm in the direction of frontage. Biomechanical changes for different conditions were investigated by means of finite element analyses. Results LeFort I osteotomy of maxillary complex area in CLP was advanced. Constrictions occurred in alveolar crest and palate, when the cleft was retained. Constriction of alveolar crest and palate was not obvious, when the cleft palate was connected by a titanium plate. There were no differences between sagittal and vertical displacement to internal distraction in LeFort I osteotomy. Clockwise rotation occurred in vertical direction. Conclusions Internal maxillary distraction with fixation between cleft palate could avoid constriction of alveolar crest and palate. It provides the options and reference to the surgi- cal plans.
作者 李孝英 侯敏
出处 《中华医学美学美容杂志》 2012年第5期327-330,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金(编号:06KY20)
关键词 唇腭裂 生物力学 有限元法 牵引成骨 Cleft lip and palate (CLP) Biomechanics Finite element method Distrac-tion osteogenesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Cohen SR, Burstein FD,Stewart MB, et al. Maxillary-midfacedistraction in children with cleft lip and palate: a preliminary re-port. Plast Reconstr Surg,1997,99(5) : 1421-1426.
  • 2He D,Genecov DG,Barcelo R. Nonunion of the external max-illary distraction in cleft lip and palate ? analysis of possible rea-sons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,68(10) :2402-2411.
  • 3Wang XX,Wang X,Yi B? et al. Internal midface distraction incorrection of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lipand palate. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2005,116(1):51-60.
  • 4Da Silva Filho OG, Boiani E,de Oliveira Cavassan A, et al.Rapid maxillary expansion after secondary alveolar bone graftingin patients with alveolar cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2009,46(3):331-338.
  • 5侯敏,石广玉,濮礼臣,宋大立,张锡忠,柳春明.唇腭裂上颌复合体在不同类型上颌截骨内置式牵引下生物力学研究[J].中华整形外科杂志,2009,25(5):368-372. 被引量:3
  • 6周先连,王有朝,王成焘.面中部牵张成骨有限元研究[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2004,21(2):292-296. 被引量:11
  • 7Fearon JA. The LeFort 羾 osteotomy: to distract or not to dis-tract? Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001,107(5) : 1091-1103.
  • 8文抑西,石冰,杨壮群.牙槽突和硬腭全裂隙植骨修复对腭裂上颌骨模型的生物力学影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2006,24(2):117-120. 被引量:9

二级参考文献18

共引文献17

同被引文献27

  • 1李玉梅,张孟平,查年宝.前方牵引治疗上颌骨发育不足:扩弓组与未扩弓组的疗效比较[J].上海口腔医学,2004,13(5):437-440. 被引量:5
  • 2熊国平,王颖,汪麟,邓莉华,曾群欢.改良前方牵引器治疗前牙反牙合的牙颌面形态变化[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2004,10(6):346-348. 被引量:3
  • 3余嘉,王冬梅,潘晓岗,钱玉芬,王成焘.单侧唇腭裂患者上颌快速扩弓矫治生物力学效果的三维有限元研究[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2006,25(3):365-369. 被引量:7
  • 4Dugoni S,Aubert M,Baumrind S. Differential diagnosis andtreatment planning for early mixed dentition malocclusion. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006,129(4) :S80-S81.
  • 5Melsen B,Melsen F. The postnatal development of the palato-maxillary region studied on human autopsy material. Am JOrthod, 1982,82(4).-329-342.
  • 6Jiang JH, Lin JX,Ji CR. Two-stage treatment of skeletal classHI malocclusion during the early permanent dentition. Am JOrthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005 ,128(2) : 520-527.
  • 7Zhang N, Bai YX,Li S. Two-stage treatment of a skeletal classHI patient with severe crowding. J Clin Orthod, 2012,46(4):225-232.
  • 8Kuroda S,Sakai Y,Tamamura N, et al. Treatment of severeanterior open bite with skeletal anchorage in adults: comparisonwith orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop, 2007,13(2):599-605.
  • 9Kircelli BH, Pektas Z. Midfacial protraction with skeletally an-chored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary re-sults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008,133 (4) : 440-449.
  • 10Arangio P,Marianetti TM,Tedaldi M,et al.Early secondary alveoloplasty in cleft lip and palate[J].J Craniofac Surg,2008,19(5):1364-1369.

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部