期刊文献+

论辩系统的动态性及其研究进展 被引量:6

Dynamics of Argumentation Systems and Its Research Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论辩系统是一种非单调形式体系,能够支持个体Agent的推理决策和多Agent之间的有效交互.由于个体Agent的知识、观察信息和资源的动态性以及多Agent交互过程的动态性,在各类论辩系统中,论证及其攻击关系的动态性是普遍存在的.作为一个新的研究领域,有关论辩系统动态性的概念、理论和方法远未成熟.在介绍论辩系统相关概念的基础上,阐明论辩系统动态性的两个主要研究方向(正向动态性和逆向动态性),并讨论需要解决的开放性问题.围绕这些问题,简要回顾现有的理论和方法,并分析其特点和不足. Argumentation systems are a kind of non-monotonic formalisms, capable of supporting the reasoning and decision-making of individual agents, and the effective interactions among multiple agents. Since the knowledge, observations of an individual agent and the interacting process of different agents are dynamic in various argumentation systems, the changing of arguments and attacks is pervasive. As a new research area, the concepts, theories and methods related to dynamic of argumentation systems are far from mature. After introducing the basic working mechanism of argumentation systems, this paper presents two research directions of dynamics of argumentation systems (i.e., forward dynamics and backward dynamics) and discusses some open problems to be resolved. According to these problems, the paper briefly reviews the existing theories and methods, and analyzes their properties and shortcomings.
作者 廖备水
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期2871-2884,共14页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(61175058 60773177) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)(2012CB316400) 浙江省自然科学基金(Y1100036)
关键词 论辩系统 非单调推理 Agent与多Agent系统 动态性 基于知识的系统 argumentation system non-monotonic reasoning agent and multi-agent system dynamics knowledge-based system
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

共引文献16

同被引文献23

  • 1熊明辉.非形式逻辑的对象及其发展趋势[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2006,46(2):71-75. 被引量:18
  • 2Prakken H,Vreeswijk G. Logic systems for defeasible ar- gumentation[ C ]//Gabbay D. Handbook of Philosophical logic(2nd ed. ). IS. 1. ] :Kluwer Academic Pub,2000.
  • 3Vreeswijk G A W. Abstract argumentation systems [ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1997 (90) :225 - 279.
  • 4Nute D. I)efeasible reasoning and decision support sys- tems [ J ]. Decis. Support Syst., 1988 (4) :97 - 110.
  • 5Loui R. P. Defeat among arguments II, Report WUCS - 89 - 06, Department of Computer Science [ Z ]. [ S. 1. ] : Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 1989.
  • 6Dung P M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fun- damental role in non-monotonic reasoning,logic program- ming and n-person games [ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1995,77(2) :321 - 357.
  • 7Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning[ J]. Artificial In- telligence, 1980( 13 ) :81 - 132.
  • 8McCarthy J. Circumscription-a form of non-monotonic reasoning [ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1980 ( 13 ) : 81 - 132.
  • 9Liao B, Jin L, Robert C K. Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method [ J ]. Artificial Intelli- gence,2011 ( 11 ) : 1790.
  • 10Bondareko A, Dung P M, Kowalski R A, et al. An ab- stract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reason- ing[ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1997 (2) :63 - 101.

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部