期刊文献+

论“共同但有区别的责任”对碳关税贸易措施的约束 被引量:6

Governance of Carbon Tariff Trade Measure by “Common But Differentiated Responsibilities” Principle
原文传递
导出
摘要 碳关税源于碳减排国家维持竞争力和减少碳泄漏的需要。作为气候贸易措施,碳关税应符合WTO涵盖协定及气候公约"共同但有区别责任"原则,从而减少多边贸易治理和气候治理的分歧,维护南北国家在贸易体制下的权利义务平衡。该原则在碳关税争端中适用是可行的,它为WTO可持续发展原则一定程度地反映,亦可为TBT协定、GATT第20条引言所兼容,DSU对司法解释的规定和争端解决实践亦证实外部国际法原则可被纳入环境贸易争端中予以解释。 Carbon tariff is a border tax adjustment levied to cope with competition and carbon leakage problem. As a climate trade measure, carbon tariff should conform to both WTO rules and "Common But Differentiated Responsibilities" principle adopted by Climate Convention, which is established on the developed countries' historic emissions responsibility and their current ability to reduce emission. The Common But Differentiated Responsibilities Principle allocates the responsibilities for developed and developing countries when pursuing sustainable development, and this principle is reflected in TBT Agreement and Article 20 of GATT. The Dispute Settlement Jurisprudence and Judicial interpretation rules adopted by DSU prove that the non-WTO rules can also play a part in solving the trade disputes. Therefore, the analysis of carbon tariff from the perspective of "Common but Differentiated Responsibilities" is feasible and could improve the harmony of trade governance and climate governance, protecting developing countries' interests under the WTO.
作者 王燕
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期102-112,共11页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 广东省社会科学"十一五规划"学科共建项目(08GK-03) 江西社会科学研究"十二五"(2011)规划项目(11FX25)
关键词 碳关税 共同但有区别的责任 世界贸易组织 carbon tariff common but differentiated responsibilities WTO
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献118

  • 1赵维田.论GATT/WTO解决争端机制[J].法学研究,1997,19(3):52-81. 被引量:55
  • 2黄晓峰.中国如何应对“碳关税”的挑战[J].消费导刊,2009,0(24):24-24. 被引量:6
  • 3张若思.世界贸易组织内的“环境”争端[J].环球法律评论,2002,24(125):399-410. 被引量:18
  • 4国际人权法教程项目组.国际人权法教程(第一卷)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.154.
  • 5[英]帕特莎·波尼,埃伦·波义尔.国际法与环境(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
  • 6Shue Henry, Global Environment and International Inequality, International Affairs 75 (3), 1999.
  • 7John Ntambirweki, The Developing Countries in the Evolution of an International Environmental Law, 14 Hastings International Law and Comparative Law Review, 1995.
  • 8Lavnya Rajamani, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, 2006. Malcolm D. Evans (eds), International Law, Oxford University Press, 2003, at 111.
  • 9Mathias Risse, Who Should Shoulder the Burden? Global Climate Change and Common Ownership of the Earth, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, John F. Kennedy School of Government - Harvard University, December 2008.
  • 10Simon Caney, Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change, Leiden Journal of International Law, 18 (2005).

共引文献64

同被引文献99

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部