摘要
目的翻译和修订术后疼痛评估护理实践问卷(Postoperative PainAssessment Nursing Practice Questionnaire,PPA—NPQ)并测试中文版的信效度。方法通过翻译、回译、专家咨询等一系列方法翻译并修订中文版术后疼痛评估护理实践问卷,指导258名外科护士现场答卷,并应用SPSS17.0进行问卷信、效度的统计分析。结果中文版PPA-NPQ总问卷的内部一致性Cronbach旺系数0.889、分半系数为0.729、重测信度0.875,各维度的Cronbach'sα系数为0.820—0.857、分半系数0.797—0.862、重测信度0.846—0.902;各维度与总问卷的相关系数在0.704—0.818之间(P〈0.01)。结论中文版PPA-NPQ信效度良好,可作为我国外科护士术后疼痛评估护理实践现状调查的测量工具。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Postoperative Pain Assessment Nursing Practice Questionnaire (PPA-NPQ). Methods A forward-backward translation procedure was followed to develop the Chinese version of PPA-NPQ. A total of 258 surgical nurses were investigated by the revised Chinese version dimensions of PPA-NPQ,then the results were tested on reliability and validity by SPSS17. 0. Results The cronbach's of the Chinese version of PPA-NPQ was 0. 889. The splithalf coefficient and testretest reliability of PPA-NPQ were 0. 729,0. 875 respectively; the Cronbach's(,splithalf coefficient and test-retest reliability of each sub-scale were ranged from 0. 820-0. 857,0.797-0. 862,0. 846-0.902 respectively. The correlation between each sub-scale and total scale were ranged from 0. 704-0.818 (P 〈 0.01 ) . Conclusion The revised Chinese PPA-NPQ is reliable and valid, and can be used to test the level of postoperative pain assessment practice by surgical nurse
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第10期951-953,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词
手术
疼痛评估
护理实践
信度
效度
Surgery
Pain assessment
Nursing practice
Reliability
Validity