期刊文献+

我国保险代位权制度的困境——以双重法律关系的纠结为视角 被引量:1

The Predicament of China's Insurance Subrogation System:From the Angle of Dilemma of Two Kinds of Legal Relationships
原文传递
导出
摘要 法定的债权移转导致我国保险代位权制度面临着双重法律关系纠结的困境,即在本应以被保险人与第三人的请求权关系为主线而展开的代位求偿的进程中却混入了被保险人与保险人之间的保险合同关系,进而发生纠结,并给保险人行使代位权构成巨大障碍。这一困境的根本原因是其背离了保险法损失补偿原则着重于分配补偿结果而非请求权的主旨。为此,有必要从英美法系权利法定代位的安排中寻求制度借鉴,消解双重法律关系纠结的困境。 China' s insurance subrogation system is confronted with the confusion of two kinds of legal rela- tionships due to the arragement of legal assignment of rights of claim. The embodiment of this predicament is that the relationship between the insured and the third party which should have been the main line of insur- ance subrogation system is confused with that of insurance contract between the insured and the insurer, and thus has posed a great obstacle to the enforcement of insurance subrogation. The fundamental cause of this dilemma is that the present arrangement has departed from the indemnity principle of insurance law which emphasizes the distribution of compensation result but not that of rights of claim. Therefore it is necessary to draw on the experience of legal subrogation of rights of claim of common law system to remold China' s in- surance subrogation system, which would address the problem of confusion of two kinds of legal relationships.
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第11期37-45,共9页 Finance & Economics
基金 作者主持的2011年度武汉大学自主科研项目"我国保险代位权制度的困境与选择"的阶段性研究成果
关键词 法定的债权移转 权利法定代位 保险代位权制度 实质审查 形式审查 Legal Assignment of Rights of Claim Legal Subrogation of Rights of Claim Insurance Subroga- tion System Examination as to Substance Examination as to Form
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1黄裕凯.英美保险代位理论--兼论与我国法理论的差异[J].保险专刊,1999,(6):56.
  • 2孙玉荣,李记华.保险代位求偿权的若干法律问题研究[A].唐金龙(主编).海商法保险法评论[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2007.
  • 3案例来源:司法案例-北大法律信息网-北大法宝,http://vip.chinalawinfo.corn/case/display-content.asp?Gid:117465591&Keyword,登录时间:2011年6月15日.
  • 4案例:“中国平安保险股份有限公司广州分公司诉南通通岚航运有限责任公司水路货物运输合同货损赔偿纠纷案”,司法案例-北大法律信息网-北大法宝,http://rip.chinalawinfo.corn/ease/displaycontent.asp?Gid=117465591&Keyword,登录时间:2011年6月15日.
  • 5汪鹏南.对海上保险法若干问题的探讨[A],现代海上保险法的理论与实践[M].大连:大连海事大学出版社,2004.
  • 6Castellain v Preston and Others, (1882-83) L. R. 11 Q. B. D. 380, per Brett, L. J.
  • 7Doug. 61, 64, 99 Eng. Rep. 538, 540 (1782) [J]. See M. L. Marasinghe, An historical introduction to the doctrine of subrogation: the early history of the doctrine I [J]. Valparaiso University Law Review, 1976, 10.
  • 8See M. L. Marasinghe, An historical introduction to the doctrine of Subrogation: the early history of the doctrine Ⅱ [J]. Valparaiso University Law Review, 1976, 10.
  • 9Castellain v. Preston (1883) 11 Q. B. D. at 380, per Brett LJ.
  • 10John F.Dobbyn,Insurance Law,West Nutshell Series,美国法精要·影印本[M].北京:法律出版社,2001-6.

共引文献1

同被引文献1

  • 1孙蓉,兰虹.保险学原理[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社.2010年第三版.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部