期刊文献+

秦汉至唐宋时期遗嘱制度的演化 被引量:7

The Evolution of the Testamentary System from the Qin and Han to the Tang and Song Dynasties
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国古代从遗令到遗嘱有一个发展演变过程,早期的遗令含多方面内容,是亡者于生前对死后各种事务的安排及意愿的表达,涵盖甚广,外力和国家律令并不干预。隋唐以来,随着门阀制度的衰弱,同居共财大家族向单个独立小家庭经济体的过渡,家财的继承越来越现实而重要,遗令渐变为家长专门分配遗产的手段,这类专门赋予经济内容的遗令即遗嘱,由唐代遗嘱法所界定。唐宋遗嘱及其样文的流行,反映出遗嘱在家产继承中的重要地位。遗嘱继承制是父权家长制在家产继承上的体现,遗嘱继承高于法定继承。宋代遗嘱,须官给公凭才合法,完全纳入国家管控。南宋实行遗嘱税,实是征收遗嘱继承遗产税,这种制度性的完善,使中国遗嘱继承制进入一个新的发展阶段。 In ancient China, there was a process of development by which dying injunctions (遗命yímìng) became wills. In the early period, the injunctions had multifaceted content; they were the deceased’s expression, while living, of wishes and arrangements for after his death. Outside forces and national laws or regulations had no part in them. From the Sui and Tang dynasties on, with the weakening of the system of hereditary aristocracy, big families with shared wealth living under one roof gradually evolved into smaller ones and the issue of inheritance of family property became more immediate and important. Last injunctions thus became the means by which the head of the family divided the inheritance. Last injunctions with economic content were in effect wills, as defined by the Testamentary Law of the Tang dynasty. The popularity of wills and sample wills in the Tang and Song dynasties reflects the importance of the will in the inheritance of family property. The system of inheritance by will reflects the patriarchal system of family property inheritance; and inheritance by will had a higher status than statutory succession. In the Song dynasty, wills were completely under state control, and a will become valid only after it had been approved by the official authorities. The Southern Song levied a tax on wills (actually an inheritance tax); this institutional refinement marks a new stage in the development of China’s system of inheritance.
作者 乜小红
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期19-35,189,共17页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1《太平御览》卷836引应劭《风俗通》北京:中华书局,1985年,第3736-3737页.
  • 2“二年律令·户律”,北京:文《天一阁藏明钞本天圣令校证》東京大学出版社,1983年重印.
  • 3陆士衡.《吊魏武帝文》,《陆士衡文集校注》卷9,刘运好校注,南京:凤凰出版社,2007年,第905页.
  • 4h沙知编.《敦煌契约文书辑校》,第508-512页,对本件定题为《年代不详(840前后)僧崇恩析产遗嘱》.
  • 5敦煌遗嘱样文有:斯6537号2v3v《遗书一道样文》;斯0343号11v《析产遗嘱样文》.
  • 6斯6537号5v6v《慈父遗书一道样文》,收入唐耕耦、陆宏基编.《敦煌社会经济文献真迹释录》第2辑,第159-182页.
  • 7伯4001号《遗书样文》,收入唐耕耦、陆宏基编.《敦煌社会经济文献真迹释录》第2辑,第159-182页.
  • 8《汜显祐遗言文书》第10行,《吐鲁番出土文书》录文本第5册,第71页;图版本第2册,第204页.
  • 9羽田亨编053号.《吴安君分家书》,日本(財)武田科学振興財団(大阪),館長吉川忠夫編.《杏雨書屋葳敦煌秘笈影片冊一》,大阪:i法呤印刷株式会社,2009年,第348-351頁.
  • 10姜密.中国古代非“户绝”条件下的遗嘱继承制度[J].历史研究,2002(2):159-163. 被引量:18

二级参考文献42

共引文献114

同被引文献102

引证文献7

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部