期刊文献+

高龄结肠癌患者接受完整结肠系膜切除术的可行性研究 被引量:9

Feasibility of complete mesocolic excision in elderly patients with colon cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨高龄结肠癌患者接受完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)的短期疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析北京大学人民医院胃肠外科2009年11月至2012年2月间接受CME治疗的71例结肠癌患者的临床资料,以70岁为界点分为高龄组(大于或等于70岁.37例)和非高龄组(小于70岁,34例),比较两组患者的短期疗效和安全性。结果高龄组与非高龄组结肠癌患者CME手术切除系膜面积分别为(13049±4332)mmz和(13163±4725)mm2,高位结扎血管距肠壁距离为(95±22)mm和(98±20)mm,高位结扎血管距肿瘤距离为(130±25)mm和(128±25)mm,结肠切除长度(262±60)mm和(245±49)mm,淋巴结清扫数目为(22.0±6.4)枚和(24.8±9.9)枚,差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后主要并发症、排气时间、排粪时间、引流管拔除时间、恢复进食时间、术后3d引流量、住院死亡等安全性指标的差异亦无统计学意义(均P〉0.05),但高龄患者住院时间和住院费用明显增加(均P〈0.01)。结论高龄结肠癌患者接受择期CME手术可以达到与非高龄组患者一致的肿瘤切除及淋巴结清扫效果.且手术安全性良好. Objective To explore the short-term outcomes and safety of complete mesocolic excision (CME) in elderly patients with colon cancer. Methods The clinical pathological factors of 71 patients with colon cancer undergoing CME procedure by the same group of surgeons were analyzed retrospectively from November 2009 to February 2012. The elderly group (≥70 years) and the non- elderly group (〈70 years) were compared regarding short-term outcomes and safety. Results Similar extent of resection could be achieved in the elderly and non-elderly groups in terms of area of mesentery [ (13 049±4332) vs. (13 163±4725) mm2, P=0.916], distance between the tumor and the high ligation site [(95±22) vs. (98±20) mm, P=0.516], distance between normal bowel and high ligation site [(130±25) vs. (128±25) mm, P=0.731], the length of colon [(262±60) vs. (245±49) mm, P=0.2121, and lymph nodes retrieved (22.0±6.4 vs. 24.8±9.9, P=0.168). The mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, time to first flatus, time to first bowel movement, drainage removal time, diet resumption, drainage volume in three days after surgery, and hospital deaths showed no statistical signifieanees (all P〉0.05), while hospital stay and expenses of the elderly group were significantly increased (both P〈0.01). Condtmion Elderly patients undergoingelective CME operation (:an achieve similar operative extent and lymph nodes harvest, and the surgieal risk is not inereased.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第10期1023-1026,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 首都临床特色应用研究项目(Zl11107058811046)
关键词 结肠肿瘤 完整结肠系膜切除术 高龄 治疗效果 安全性 Colonie neoplasms Complete mesoeolic excision Ehterly Treatmentomtcomes Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardizedsurgery for colonic cancer : complete mesocolic excision andcentral ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis,2009,11(4):354-364.
  • 2West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Completemesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces anoncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgeryfor carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol, 2010,28(2):272-278.
  • 3West NP, Sutton KM, Ingeholm P, et al. Improving the qualityof colon cancer surgery through a surgical education program.Dis Colon Rectum, 2010,53(12) : 1594-1603.
  • 4West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, et al. Understandingoptimal colonic cancer surgery : comparison of Japanese D3resection and European complete mesocolic excision with centralvascular ligation. J Clin Oncol, 2012,30(15) : 1763-1769.
  • 5高志冬,叶颖江,王杉,杨晓东,尹慕军,梁斌,姜可伟,谢启伟,郭鹏.完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌的对比研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(1):19-23. 被引量:114
  • 6Siegel H, Naishadham D,Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012.CA Cancer J Clin, 2012,62( 1) : 10-29.
  • 7赫捷,赵平,陈万青,等.2011中国肿瘤登记年报.北京:军事医学科学出版社,2012:195.
  • 8Kohne CH, Folprecht G, Goldberg RM, et al. Chemotherapyin elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Oncologist,2008,13?4):390-402.
  • 9Ong ES, Alassas M, Dunn KB, et al. Colorectal cancersurgery in the elderly: acceptable morbidity? Am J Surg,2008,195(3):344-348.
  • 10Schiffmann L, Ozcan S, Schwarz F, et al. Colorectal cancer inthe elderly : surgical treatment and long-term survival. Int JColorectal Dis, 2008,23(6):601-610.

二级参考文献16

  • 1李国新,丁自海,张策,黄祥成,钟世镇.腹腔镜下左半结肠切除术相关筋膜平面的解剖观察[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2006,24(3):298-301. 被引量:60
  • 2Cucino C, Buchner AM, Sonnenherg A. Continued rightward shift of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45 (8): 1035-1040.
  • 3Rabeneck L, Davila JA, E1-Serag HB. Is there a ture "shift" to the right colnn in the incidence of colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol, 2003,98 (6) : 1400-1409.
  • 4McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Pihl E, et at. Comparative results of surgical management of single carcinomas of the colon and rectum: a series of 1939 patients managed by one surgeon.Br J Surg, 1981,68 (12) : 850-855.
  • 5Birgisson H, Talback M, Gunnarsson U, et al. Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2005,31 (5) : 845-853.
  • 6Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis, 2009, 11 (4) : 354-365.
  • 7West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol, 2008,9 (9) : 857-865.
  • 8Tan KY, Kawamura YJ, Mizokami K, et al. Distribution of the first metastatic lymph node in colon cancer and its clinical significance. Coloreetal Dis, 2010, 12( 1 ) :44-47.
  • 9Johnson PM, Porter CA, Ricciardi R, et al. Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage Ⅲ B and Ⅲ C colon cancer. J Clin Oncal, 2006,24(22) :3570-3575.
  • 10Wong SL, Ji H, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA, 2007,298 ( 18 ) : 2149-2154.

共引文献119

同被引文献72

引证文献9

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部