期刊文献+

256iCT血管成像在下肢动脉支架植入术后的应用价值 被引量:4

The Value of 256iCT Angiography in Lower Extremity Artery Stent
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨256iCT血管成像在下肢动脉支架植入术后支架内再狭窄的应用价值。方法对36例有临床症状的下肢动脉支架植入术后患者行256iCT下肢动脉增强扫描,将薄层轴位原始图像传入EBW工作站,运用曲面重组(curve plannar reconstruction,CPR)、多平面重组(multiplannar reconstruction,MPR)、最大密度投影(maximum intensity projection,MIP)、容积再现(volume rendering,VR)等后处理方法进行血管重组。所有患者在行CT扫描后1周内行数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)检查。以DSA结果为金标准,计算256iCT对支架内再狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性。结果 36例患者共放置支架72枚,其中58枚(80.6%)支架显影良好可以评价。在可评价支架中,以DSA为诊断标准,血管重组图像结合原始轴位图像,256iCT血管成像诊断下肢动脉支架再狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性分别为100%(27/27)、96.8%(30/31)、96.4%(27/28)、100%(30/30)、98.3%(57/58)。结论 256iCT下肢血管成像评价下肢动脉支架术后再狭窄的敏感性和准确性较高,可以作为下肢动脉支架术后怀疑支架内再狭窄患者的重要检查手段。 Objective To assess the clinical value of 256iCT angiography in the diagnosis of lower extremity artery in-stent restenosis(ISR).Methods A total of 36 patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial occlusive disease after lower extremity artery stenting(72 stented lesions) underwent 256iCT angiography.Original axial images were transferred to EBW workstation and reconstruction images(CPR、MPR、MIP、VR) were performed.36 patients underwent digital subtraction angiography(DSA) in the following week after CT angiography.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive values and accuracy of 256iCTA for diagnosis of ISR were analyzed,with DSA as the reference standard.Results Of 72 stents,58(79.2%) were determined to be assessable on CTA.Overall,DSA images as the reference standard,arterial reconstruction images combined with the original axial images,the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of 256iCTA were 100%(27/27)、96.8%(30/31)、96.4%(27/28)、100%(30/30)、98.3%(57/58) in detecting the in-stents restenosis.Conclusion 256iCT angiography have high sensitivity and accuracy for the diagnosis of ISR,therefore,it can be used in clinical practice as a test for patients with suspected ISR after lower extremity stent implantation.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期1462-1465,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 下肢动脉支架 数字减影血管成像 体层摄影术 X线计算机 再狭窄 Lower extremity artery in-stent Digital subtraction angiography Tomography X-ray computed Restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Li XM,Li YH, Tian JM,et al. Evaluation of peripheral artery stentwith 64-slice muiti-detector row CT angiography : Prospective com-parison with digital subtraction angiography. European Journal of Ra-diology, 2010,75 : 98.
  • 2Sabeti S,Schillinger M , Amighi J,et al. Primary patency of femoropo-pliteal arteries treated with nitinol versus stainless steel self-expan-ding stents : propensity score-adjusted analysis. Radiology, 2004 ,232:516.
  • 3Schillinger M,Sabeti S, Loewe C, et al. Balloon angioplasty versusimplantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. N EnglJ Med ,2006,354 :1879.
  • 4Schillinger M,Sabeti S,Dick P,et al. Sustained benefit at 2 years ofprimary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplastywith optional stenting. Circulation ,2007,115 :2745.
  • 5Waugh JH, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSAera. Radiology,1992,182:243.
  • 6Lilly MP,Reichman W,Sarazen AA,et al. Anatomic and clinical fac-tors associated with complications of transfemoral arteriography. AnnVase Surg, 1990,4:264.
  • 7仲海,邵广瑞,徐卓东,柳澄.CT血管成像在下肢动脉疾病中的应用价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(2):157-159. 被引量:30
  • 8Napoli A,Anzidei M ,Zaccagna F,et al. Peripheral Arterial OcclusiveDisease : Diagnostic Performance and Effect on Therapeutic Manage-ment of 64-Section CT Angiography. Radiology ,2011,261 :976.
  • 9龚健,乔风雷,鲍雷,王全永,徐峰,王永康.128层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影在评估冠脉支架置入后随访中的临床应用价值[J].中国实用医药,2011,6(28):15-17. 被引量:7
  • 100Htdeki 0, Kei T, Kazumasa I, et al. MDCT compared with digitalsubtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial oc-clusive disease : importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. AJR,2004,182:201.

二级参考文献20

  • 1孔令燕,金征宇,王怡宁,宋兰,张竹花,张立仁,张抒扬,林松柏,王沄,赵文敏.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像评价冠状动脉支架通畅性[J].中国医学科学院学报,2006,28(1):32-35. 被引量:44
  • 2Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multideteetor coronary CT angiography : in vitro evalution of 68 different stents. Eur radial, 2006,16:818-826.
  • 3Seifarth H, Raupach R, Schaller S, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography; evaluation of adedaicated reconstruction kemmel and a noise reduction filter. Eur Ra- dio1,2005 ,15 :721-726.
  • 4SCHUIJF J D, BAX J J, SALM L P, et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol,2005,95 (5) :571-574.
  • 5W indecker S, M aier-Rudolph W, Bonzel T, et al. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1995. Woeking Group Coeonary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 1999,20 (7) :484- 495.
  • 6DAS K M, AYMAN A, AMAR M, et al. Contrast-enhanced 64- Section Coronary Multidetector CT Angiography versus Conventional Coronary Angiography for Stent Assessment. Radiology, 2007, 10:1148.
  • 7Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupeach R, et 81. 64-slice muhidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evalution of 68 different stents. Eur radial, 2006,16(4) :573-575.
  • 8MOTTRAM P M, MEREDITH I T. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of ambiguous coronary lesions. Heart Lung Circ ,2.001,10:58-62.
  • 9MAINTZ, SEIFARTH, RAUPACH R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: invitro evaluation of 68 difference stents. Eur Radiol,2005,15 : 1876.
  • 10ONCEL D, ONCEL G, KARACA M. Coronary Stent Patency and In-Stent Restenosis:etermination with 64-Section Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography. Radiology,2007, 242(2) :403-409.

共引文献35

同被引文献60

  • 1仲海,邵广瑞,徐卓东,柳澄.CT血管成像在下肢动脉疾病中的应用价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(2):157-159. 被引量:30
  • 2吴戈,张藜莉,霍健伟,班润义,邓茂松,祖德贵,李俊秋,王军,李坚,常鑫,徐同江,曾庆玉.64排螺旋CT血管造影在下肢动脉病变人工血管旁路移植术后随访的价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(5):639-642. 被引量:3
  • 3李忠信,于淑靖,马国军.64排螺旋CT在评价冠状动脉桥血管中的价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2007,18(9):643-645. 被引量:11
  • 4Li X M,Li Y H,Tian J M,et al. Evaluation of peripheral artery stent with 64-slice multi-detector row CT angiography prospec- tive comparison with digital subtraction angiography[J]. Eur J Radiol,2010,75(10) : 98-101.
  • 5Koizumi A, Kumakura H, Kanai H, et al. Ten-year patency and factors causing restenosis after endovascular treatment of iliac ar- tery lesions[J]. Circ J, 2009,73(5) :860-866.
  • 6Hiatt M D,Fleischmann D, Hellinger J C,et al. Angiographic im- aging of the lower extremities with multidetector CT[J]. Radiol- ogy, 2005,43 (6) : 1119 - 1i23.
  • 7Albrecht T,Foert E, Holtkamp R,et al. 16-MSCT angiography of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries comparison with digital subtlraction angiography[J] AJR 2007 189(3) :702-711.
  • 8Ronan J,N igel C,V illiam F,et al. Diabetes-and nondiabetes-re- lated lower extremity amputation incidence before and after the Intro-duction of better organized diabetes foot care: continuous longitu-dinal monitoring using a standard method[J]. Diabetes Care,2008,31(5) :459-462.
  • 9White C J,Gray W A. Endovascular therapies for peripheral ar- terial disease: an evidence-based review[J], Circulation, 2007,116 (19) :2203-2215.
  • 10Fleischmann D, Rubin G D. Quantification of intravenously ad ministered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography[J]. Radiology, 2005, 236 (3):1076-1082.

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部