摘要
目的:比较2种方法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中手术时间、术后并发症方面的不同,探讨其优缺点。方法:选取60例双侧基本对称下颌阻生第三磨牙患者,两侧用不同方法拔除阻生牙,记录2组手术时间、术中断根情况、术后并发症,采用SPSS17.0软件包对数据进行配对t检验。结果:"T"型组去远中部分时间、术后24h疼痛和肿胀小于三段组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:在下颌近中阻生牙拔除术中,"T"型法优于三段法。
Objective: To compare operating time and postoperative complications between two methods in the extraction of mandible impacted third molars.Methods: Sixty patients with bilateral symmetrical mandible impacted third molars were included in this study.One side of impacted tooth were extracted by using T-shape method,while the others were extracted by using three sections method.Operating time,root pruning situation,postoperative complications were recorded.SPSS17.0 software package was used and paired t-test was performed to analyze the data.Results: There were statistical differences of distal removing time,facial edema and pain of 24h postoperative between two methods(P0.05).In the T-shape group,the time was shorter,edema and pain were milder.Conclusion: In the extraction of mandible medial impacted third molars,T-shape method is better than three sections method.
出处
《口腔医学研究》
CAS
CSCD
2012年第10期1008-1011,共4页
Journal of Oral Science Research
基金
温州市科技计划项目(编号:Y20100297)
关键词
水平阻生牙
“T”型法
三段法
牙拔除术
Level impacted tooth T-shape methods Three sections method Exodontia