期刊文献+

“T”型法和三段法在近中水平阻生牙拔除术中的比较 被引量:16

The Comparative Study of T-shape Method and Three Sections Method Applying in Extraction of Medial Level Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较2种方法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中手术时间、术后并发症方面的不同,探讨其优缺点。方法:选取60例双侧基本对称下颌阻生第三磨牙患者,两侧用不同方法拔除阻生牙,记录2组手术时间、术中断根情况、术后并发症,采用SPSS17.0软件包对数据进行配对t检验。结果:"T"型组去远中部分时间、术后24h疼痛和肿胀小于三段组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:在下颌近中阻生牙拔除术中,"T"型法优于三段法。 Objective: To compare operating time and postoperative complications between two methods in the extraction of mandible impacted third molars.Methods: Sixty patients with bilateral symmetrical mandible impacted third molars were included in this study.One side of impacted tooth were extracted by using T-shape method,while the others were extracted by using three sections method.Operating time,root pruning situation,postoperative complications were recorded.SPSS17.0 software package was used and paired t-test was performed to analyze the data.Results: There were statistical differences of distal removing time,facial edema and pain of 24h postoperative between two methods(P0.05).In the T-shape group,the time was shorter,edema and pain were milder.Conclusion: In the extraction of mandible medial impacted third molars,T-shape method is better than three sections method.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2012年第10期1008-1011,共4页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 温州市科技计划项目(编号:Y20100297)
关键词 水平阻生牙 “T”型法 三段法 牙拔除术 Level impacted tooth T-shape methods Three sections method Exodontia
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献27

  • 1翁素清,张贺志.对羧基苄胺明胶海绵预防下颌阻生智齿拔除术后干槽症[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1996,14(3):241-241. 被引量:6
  • 2裘萌.500例大学生阻生齿发病特点[J].健康大视野(医学版),2006,14(7):86-86. 被引量:1
  • 3王永和.高速涡轮牙钻法拔除下颌阻生齿的临床体会[J].广东医学院学报,2007,25(2):210-211. 被引量:2
  • 4耿温琦.高速涡轮机在拔下颌阻生智齿时的应用.中华口腔杂志,1983,18(4):212-212.
  • 5邱蔚六主编.口腔颌面外科学[M].第五版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:67-81.
  • 6Finne K,Klamfeidt A.Removal of lower third molar germs by lateraltrepanation and conventional technique.A comparative study[J].Int J Oral Surg,1981,10(4):251.
  • 7Szmyd L,Shannon IL,Schuessler CF,et al.Air turbine in impactedthird molar Surgery[J].J Oral Anesth Hosp Dent Serv Surg,1963.18(4):212.
  • 8Hansson P,Ekblom A,Thomsson M,et al.Pain development and consumption of analgesics after oral surgery in relation to personality characteristics[J].Pain,1989,37 (3):271-277.
  • 9Benediktsd6ttir IS,Wenzel A,Petersen JK,et al.Mandibular third molar removal:Risk indicators for extended operation time,postoperative pain,and complications[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2004,97 (4):438-446.
  • 10Gbotolorun OM,Arotiba GT,Ladeinde AL.Assessment of (actors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65 (10):1977-1983.

共引文献160

同被引文献120

引证文献16

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部