期刊文献+

Flow and mass balance analysis of eco-bio infiltration system

Flow and mass balance analysis of eco-bio infiltration system
原文传递
导出
摘要 A structued stormwater infiltration system was developed and constructed at a university campus and monitoring of storm events was performed during a one- year operation period. The flow and pollutant mass balances were analyzed and the overall efficiency of the system was assessed. While significant positive correla- tions were observed among rainfall, runoff and discharge volume (R2= 0.93-0.99; p 〈 0.05), there was no sig- nificant correlations existed between rainfall, runoff, discharge volume and pollutant load. The system was more effective in reducing the runoff volume by more than 50% for small storm events but the difference between the runoff and discharge volume was significant even with rainfall greater than 10ram. Results showed that the pollutant reduction rates were higher compared to the runoff volume reduction. Average pollutant reduction rates were in the range of 72% to 90% with coefficient of variation between 0.10 and 0.46. Comparable with runoff reduction, the system was more effective in reducing the pollutant load for small storm events, in the range of 80% to 100% for rainfall between 0 and 10mm; while 65% to 80% for rainfall between l0 and 20mm. Among the pollutant parameters, particulate matters was highly reduced by the system achieving only a maximum of 25% discharge load even after the entire runoff was completely discharged. The findings have proven the capability of the system as a tool in stormwater manage- ment achieving both flow reduction and water quality improvement. A structued stormwater infiltration system was developed and constructed at a university campus and monitoring of storm events was performed during a one- year operation period. The flow and pollutant mass balances were analyzed and the overall efficiency of the system was assessed. While significant positive correla- tions were observed among rainfall, runoff and discharge volume (R2= 0.93-0.99; p 〈 0.05), there was no sig- nificant correlations existed between rainfall, runoff, discharge volume and pollutant load. The system was more effective in reducing the runoff volume by more than 50% for small storm events but the difference between the runoff and discharge volume was significant even with rainfall greater than 10ram. Results showed that the pollutant reduction rates were higher compared to the runoff volume reduction. Average pollutant reduction rates were in the range of 72% to 90% with coefficient of variation between 0.10 and 0.46. Comparable with runoff reduction, the system was more effective in reducing the pollutant load for small storm events, in the range of 80% to 100% for rainfall between 0 and 10mm; while 65% to 80% for rainfall between l0 and 20mm. Among the pollutant parameters, particulate matters was highly reduced by the system achieving only a maximum of 25% discharge load even after the entire runoff was completely discharged. The findings have proven the capability of the system as a tool in stormwater manage- ment achieving both flow reduction and water quality improvement.
出处 《Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2012年第5期612-619,共8页 环境科学与工程前沿(英文)
关键词 best management practice flow balance lowimpact development mass balance nonpoint source stormwater runoff best management practice, flow balance, lowimpact development, mass balance, nonpoint source,stormwater runoff
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Coffman L. Low-Impact Development Design Strategies,an Integrated Design Approach[M].Prince George's County,Maryland:Department of Environmental Resources,Programs and Planning Division,2000.
  • 2Ferguson B. Stormwater management and stormwater restoration[A].Washington DC:Lewis Publishers,2002.
  • 3Lloyd S D,Wong T H F,Chesterfield C. Water Sensitive Urban Design:A Stormwater Management Perspective[M].Melbourne:CRC for Catchment Hydrology Industry,2002.
  • 4U.S.Department of Defense (US DoD). Unified Facilities CriteriaDesign:Low Impact Development Manual[M].Washington,DC,Unified States:U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Naval Facilities Engineering Command,and Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agency,2004.
  • 5Dunnett N,Clayden A. Rain Gardens:Sustainable Rainwater Management for the Garden and Designed Landscape[M].Portland:Timber Press,2007.
  • 6Bettess R. Infiltration Drainage-Manual of Good Practice[M].London:Construction Industry Research and Information Association,1996.
  • 7Strecker E W,Quigley M M,Urbonas B R,Jones E J Clary J K. Determining urban storm water BMP effectiveness[J].Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,2001,(03):144-149.
  • 8Weinstein N. Decentralized Stormwater Controls for Urban Retrofit and Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction[M].Alexandria,VA,United States:Water Environment Research Foundation,2006.
  • 9National Research Council (NRC). Urban Stormwater Management in the United States[M].Washington DC:National Academies Press,2008.
  • 10Battiata J,Collins K,Hirschman D,Hoffman G. The runoff reduction method[J].Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education,2010.11-21.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部