期刊文献+

书面词语和手语对聋生语义分类影响的实验研究 被引量:6

An Experimental Study of the Effect of Written Language and Sign Language on Deaf Students' Semantic Categorization
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过以书面语(或手语)的语音、语义、无关三种干扰方式考察聋生基本水平概念语义分类能力情况,结果显示聋生基本水平概念语义分类能力弱于健听生。聋生基本水平概念语义分类能力成绩受刺激材料的性质影响较大,聋生在手语干扰下的语义分类成绩优于在书面语干扰下的语义分类成绩。语音对聋生语义分类影响不大,手形对聋生语义分类有显著影响,干扰词与靶子词具有主题关联联系时对聋生完成语义分类任务影响不大。采用书面语作为刺激材料可能会低估聋生的语义分类能力,支持手语词汇通达的交互激活模型。 This study aims to probe into deaf students' ability in semantic categorization, by using written language (or sign language) in phonetic interference, semantic interference and marelated interference. The resuits show the following: the deaf students show a lower level of abihty in semantic categorization than the normal students; the stimuli affect the deaf students' scores in semantic categorization; they achieve higher scores under sign language interference than under written language interference; the phoneticized language has little effect on their semantic categorization; the hand shapes have a significant effect on their semantic categorization; and the interfering words and the target words, when showing thematic associations, have httle effect on their semantic categorization. According to the results, the use of written language as stimuli may cause the underestimation of the deaf children's ability in semantic categorization, as suggests that the results support the interactive activation model.
作者 冯建新 冯敏
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期27-31,共5页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20090451367) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(GK200901020) 陕西省社会科学基金项目(立项号:05K002Z) 陕西师范大学优秀科技预研项目(项目编号:200902008) 西安市社会科学规划基金项目(12JYQ1)资助
关键词 聋生 语义分类 手语 书面语 deaf student semantic categorization sign language written language
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1朱晓平,顾泓彬.汉语字词识别研究的现状[J].心理科学,1992,15(1):40-45. 被引量:22
  • 2李德高,张积家,何维维,陈晓君,张晓娜,林小珍,李玲.聋青少年分类学联系概念词词汇联想[J].中国特殊教育,2009(12):28-31. 被引量:4
  • 3Kyle F, Harris M. Concurrent correlates and predictors of reading and spelling achievement in deaf and hearing school children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Edu- cation, 2006,11 (3) : 273 - 288.
  • 4Howell M J, Manis F R. Developmental and reader ability differences in semantic processing efficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1986,78(2) : 124 - 129.
  • 5Marschark M, Convertino C, McEvoy C, et al. Organi- zation and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals. Cognition, 2004, 149(1) :51 - 61.
  • 6Waters G S, Doehring D G. Reading acquisition in con- genitally deaf children who communicate orally: Insights from an analysis of component reading, language, and memory skills. In T.H. Carr & B. A. Levy ( Eds. ), Reading and its development: Component skills ap- proaches. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1990.323 - 373.
  • 7Leybaert J, Alegria J. Spelling development in deaf and heating children: evidence for use of morphological reg- ularities in French. Reading and Writing, 1995, (7) 89 - 109.
  • 8Corina D P, Knapp H. Lexical retrieval in American Sign I.angnage production. In: Goldstein L M, Whalen D H, Best C T. (Eds.). Papers in Laboratory Phonol- ogy 8 : Varieties of Phonological Competence. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. 213 - 240.
  • 9Lin E L, Murphy G L. Thematic relations in adults' concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gener- al,2001,130(1 ) :3 - 28.

二级参考文献18

共引文献24

同被引文献74

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部