期刊文献+

公平感知和效率感知对供应链合作关系稳定性的影响——以环境不确定性为调节变量 被引量:14

公平感知和效率感知对供应链合作关系稳定性的影响——以环境不确定性为调节变量
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分配公平、程序公平和效率感知都是影响供应链合作关系稳定性的关键因素,但对于哪一个影响更为显著的问题,以往的研究则观点不一。本文对226份来自于国内制造企业的调查问卷研究表明,环境不确定性调节着上述三个因素的相对重要性。当环境不确定性增加时,公平感知——包括分配公平和程序公平的重要性增加,效率感知的重要性降低。就国内外学者研究推测分配公平与程序公平之间比较而言,程序公平的重要性略有增加,但这一假设并没有得到验证。研究结果提示:供应链管理者不能简单地追求分配公平、程序公平或供应链整体效率,管理的策略应随环境变化频率而异。 Distribution fairness, procedural fairness and efficiency perception are all the key factors of effecting supply chain cooperation relations, but as to which of the three is of the most significant impact, there were different perspectives in previous re- searches. The author made a survey research by selecting 226 domestic manufacturing enterprises, showing that the envi- ronmental uncertainty regulates the relative importance of the above three factors. When the environmental uncertainty in- creases, the importance of fairness perception increases including distribution fairness and procedural fairness, and the im- pertance of efficiency perception reduces. This paper based on the studies of scholars' inferences supposes that the procedural fairness has a light increase, while the assumption is not verified. The results suggest that supply chain managers should not simply pursue the distribution fairness, the procedural fairness or the whole supply chain efficiency, but adjust management strategies with the environment change frequency.
机构地区 吉林大学商学院
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2012年第10期43-47,共5页 Enterprise Economy
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"资源 权力与供应链协调机制研究"(批准号:10YJA630029)
关键词 分配公平 程序公平 效率感知 关系稳定性 环境不确定性 distribution fairness procedural fairness efficiency perception relationship stability environmental uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kumar N. The power of trust in manufacturer retailer re- lationships [J] . Harvard Business Review, 1996, 74(6): 92 - 106.
  • 2Bachmann R. Trust, power and control in trans- organi- zational relations [ J ]. Organization Studies, 2001,22 (2) : 337 - 365.
  • 3Adams, J. S. Inequity in social exchange [ J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, (2) : 267 - 299.
  • 4Stephen S. Tax, Stephen W. Brown & Murali Chan- drashekaran. Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experi- ences: Implications for Relationship Marketing [J] . Journal of Marketing, 1998,62(4): 60 - 76.
  • 5W. Chan Kim,Renee A. Mauborgne. Implementing Glob- al Strategies: The Role of Procedural Justice[J] . Strategic Man- agement Journal, 1991, (12): 87 - 99.
  • 6Camerer, C. F. Progress in Behavioral Game Theory[J]. Journal of Economic Perspective, 1997,11 (4): 167 - 188.
  • 7Lind E. A.. & Tyler,R. R. The social psychology of pro- cedural justice[J]. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
  • 8Greenberg & McCarty. The Interpersonal Aspects of Procedural Justice: A New Perspective in Pay Fairness[J]. Labor Law Journal, 1990, (8) : 580 - 586.
  • 9Kees van Bos, Rie| Vermunt, Henk A. m. Wilke. Proced- ural and Distributive Justice: What Is Fair Depend More on What Comes First Than on What Comes Next[J]. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 1997,72 ( 1 ) : 95 - 104.
  • 10孙桂林.供应链效率优化研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2005.

同被引文献256

引证文献14

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部