期刊文献+

唑来膦酸和伊班膦酸钠治疗乳腺癌骨转移的疗效和安全性比较 被引量:4

Comparative study on the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid and sodium ibandronate in treating bonemetastasis in breast cancer patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价发生骨转移的乳腺癌患者在接受唑来膦酸和伊班膦酸钠治疗的有效性和安全性。方法47例发生骨转移的乳腺癌分别接受唑来膦酸和伊班膦酸钠治疗。用Kaplan-Meier曲线及Log-rank检验骨相关事件(skeletal related event,SRE)生存时间及总生存率差异,止痛效果及不良反应发生率用x。检验。结果①止痛总有效率唑来膦酸组和伊班膦酸钠组分别为88.9%(24/27)和85%(17/20)(P=0.467)。②1、2、3年无SRE生存率唑来膦酸组分别为88.7%、44.4%、24.2%,伊班膦酸钠组分别为94.7%、40.5%、5.8%(P=0.744)。(觐、3、4年总生存率唑来膦酸组分别为70.4%、40.7%、23.1%,伊班膦酸钠组分别为85%、46.7%、17.5%(P=0.994)。①②③差异均无统计学意义。④1、2、3年无SRE生存率首发表现单纯骨转移组为92%、50.8%、23.8%,首发合并局部复发及其他脏器转移组为85.4%、21.4%、5.3%(P=0.012)。⑤2、3年总生存率首发单纯骨转移组95.8%、74.2%,首发合并局部复发及其他脏器转移组为56.5%、10.1%(P〈0.001)。④⑤差异有统计学意义。不良反应发生2组无明显差别。结论唑来膦酸在延迟乳腺癌骨转移SRE发生及总生存方面不优于伊班膦酸钠,首发合并其他脏器转移患者预后不良,在不良反应发生率及疼痛控制方面2者疗效相当。 Objective To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid and sodium ibandronate in treating bone metastasis in breast cancer patients. Methods The study included 47 patients who were treated with zoledronic acid and sodium ibandronate respectively from Aug. 2006 to Mar. 2011. Kaplan- Meier curve and Log rank test were adopted to detect the difference in survival time of skeletal related event (SRE) and survival rate between patients treated with different medicine, andx2 test was used to reveal the rate difference of pain killing effects and adverse effects. Results 1. The total effective rate of pain killing was 88.9% and 85% respectively. The difference had no statistical significance(P =0. 467). 2. The 1, 2 and 3- year-survival rate in zoledronic acid group and sodium ibandronate group was 88. 7%, 44.4%, 24. 2% vs 94. 7%, 40. 5%, 5.8%. The difference had no statistical significance(P =0. 744). 3. The 2, 3, and 4-year- survival rate in zoledronic acid group and sodium ibandronate group was 70. 4% , 40. 7% , 23.1% vs 85% , 46. 7% , 17. 5%. The difference had no statistical significance(P =0. 994). 4. The 1, 2 and 3-year SRE-free overall survival rate of the group with metastasis first to bone only was 92%, 50. 8% , and 23.8% ,while the rate of the group with first metastasis to visceral organs was 85.4% , 21.4% , and 5.3% (P =0.012). 5. The 2 and 3-year overall survival rate of the group with metastasis first to bone only was 95.8% and 74. 2% respectively, while the rate of the group with first metastasis to visceral organs was 56. 5% and 10. 1% ( P 〈 0. 001 ). The differ- ence of 4 and 5 had statistical significance. The difference of zoledronic acid group and sodium ibandronate group in rate of adverse effects had no statistical significance. Conclusions Compared to sodium ibandronate, zole- dronic acid has no superiority in either delaying the occurrence of SRE or improving overall survival rate. The 2 are similar in incidence of adverse effects and pain control. The prognosis of patients whose first presentation is complicated by metastasis to other organs is poor.
出处 《中华内分泌外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第5期330-334,共5页 Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
关键词 乳腺癌 骨转移 骨相关事件 唑来膦酸 伊班膦酸钠 Breast cancer Bonemetastasis Skeletal related event Zoledronicacid Sodium ibandronate
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Van Poznak CH, Temin S, Yee GC, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guide- line update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2011,29(9) :1221-1227.
  • 2Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double- blind, muhicenter, comparative trial [ J ]. Cancer, 2003,98 ( 8 ) : 1735-1744.
  • 3Rosen LS, Gordon DH, Dugan W Jr, et al. Zoledronic acid is su-perior to pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases in breast carcinoma patients with at lest one steolytic lesion [ J]. Cancer, 2004,100( 1 ) :36-43.
  • 4Santini D, Vincenzi B, Dicuonzo G, et al. Zoledronic acid in- duces significant and long-lasting modifications of circulating an- giogenic factors in cancer patients [ J ]. Clin Cancer Res, 2003,9 ( 8 ) :2893-2897.
  • 5Vincenzi B, Santini D, Dicuonzo G, et al. Zoledronic acid-related angiogenesis modifications and survival in advanced breast cancer patients [ J ]. J Interferon Cytokine Res,2005,5 ( 3 ) : 144-151.
  • 6Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases [ J ]. Nature,2000,407 (6801) :249-257.
  • 7Boissier S, Colombel M, Delmas P, et al. Zoledronic acid inhibits in vivo experimental angiogenesis [ J ]. Bone, 2002, 30 (3 Suppl) :38S.
  • 8Niikura N, Liu J, Hayashi N, et al. Retrospective analysis of anti- tumor effects of zoledronic acid in breast cancer patients with bone- only metastases [ J ]. Cancer, 2012 118 ( 8 ) : 2039 -2047.
  • 9Henk H J, Kaura S. Retrospective database analysis of the effect of zoledronic acid on skeletal-related events and mortality in women with breast cancer and bone metastasis in a managed care plan [J]. J ned Eeon,2012,15(1) :175-184.
  • 10陈晓萍,王腾.唑来膦酸与伊班膦酸治疗癌性骨痛临床分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(22):1725-1727. 被引量:6

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘瑶,刘治军,傅得兴.新一代二膦酸盐类药物唑来膦酸的药理及临床[J].中国新药杂志,2004,13(11):1058-1060. 被引量:11
  • 2杨文,唐武兵,古伟光,伍楚蓉,罗海涛,张复华.唑来膦酸治疗恶性肿瘤骨转移引起疼痛的疗效分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(12):949-950. 被引量:12
  • 3宋三泰 汤仲明 等.乳癌组织取样、保存及测定方法对ER测定量的影响及其意义[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1985,7:351-353.
  • 4[1]Martin TJ, Moseley JM. Mechanisms in the skeletal complications of breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer., 2000,7: 271 - 284.
  • 5[2]Huber S, Ulsperger E, Gomar C, et al. Osseous metastases in breast cancer:radiographic monitoring of therapeutic response. Anticancer Res,2002,22:1279 - 1288.
  • 6[7]Solomayer EF, Diel IJ, Meyberg GC, et al. Metastatic breast cancer: clinical course, prognosis and therapy related to the first site of metastasis.Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2000,59: 271 - 278.
  • 7[8]Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer, 2002,2: 584 - 593.
  • 8Coleman R E. Bisphosphonates: clinical experience[J]. Oncologist,2004,9(4) :14-27.
  • 9Rosen L, Harland S J,Oosterlinck W. Broad clinical activity of zoledronic acid in osteolytic to oste0blastie bone lesions in pa tients with a broad range of solid tumors[J]. Am J Clio Oncol, 2002,25(6 Suppl 1):S19,24.
  • 10Lipton A. Toward new horizons: the future of bisphosphonate therapy[J]. Oncologist, 2004,9(4) :38-47.

共引文献34

同被引文献55

  • 1石晶,付凌雨,刘云鹏,金波.唑来膦酸和帕米膦酸二钠治疗骨转移癌疼痛疗效比较的Meta分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(17):5051-5056. 被引量:8
  • 2余昕航,党雪菲.唑来膦酸预防老年乳腺癌患者阿那曲唑所致骨质疏松的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(11):3162-3163. 被引量:9
  • 3帅玉英,沈宇峰,黄海娟,李佶松.功能性配料茶氨酸的生产应用与法规情况简介[J].中国食品添加剂,2013,0(S1):215-219. 被引量:3
  • 4Fan L,Slmsser-Weippl K,Li JJ,et al.Breast cancer in China [J]. Lancet Oncol,2014,15(7) :e279-289.
  • 5Coleman RE.Adjuvant bisphosphonates in breast cancer: are we witnessing the emergence of a new therapeutic strategy? [J].Eur J Cancer, 2009,45 ( 11 ) : 1909-1915.
  • 6Hagberg KW,Taylor A,Hernandez RK,et al.Incidence of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the United Kingdom: results of a multi-database linkage study using the general practice research database[J].Cancer Epidemiol, 2013,37(3) :240-246.
  • 7Henk HJ,Kaura S.Retrospective database analysis of the effect of zoledronic acid on skeletal-related events and mortality in women with breast cancer and bone metastasis in a managed care plan[J].J Med Econ,2012,15(1 ): 175-184.
  • 8Howell A, Cuzick J, Baum M, et al.Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years' adjuvant treatment for breast cancer [J].Lancet,2005,365 (9453) :60-62.
  • 9Bundred NJ.Aromatase inhibitors and bone health [J ].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2009,21 ( 1 ) : 60-67.
  • 10Van Poznak CH,Temin S,Yee GC,et al.American Society of Clini- cal Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2011,29(9) : 1221-1227.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部