期刊文献+

考虑用户忍耐的网络服务拥塞价控策略 被引量:1

Congestion pricing for Internet service with customer impatience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统网络服务价控策略研究属于规范性范畴,是在用户完全理性的理想假设下展开研究.由于有限的信息及认知能力等的约束,网络服务提供商(Internet Service Provider,ISP)及用户很难做出理性的决策.通过引入用户保留率,将用户对系统服务的响应时间的忍耐考虑到网络服务价控策略之中,运用博弈理论分别给出了基于社会福利最大化与ISP收益最大化下的网络服务拥塞价控策略,并分析了其对用户效用和ISP收益的影响;应用算例比较了基于社会福利最大化与ISP收益最大化下的ISP收益及价控策略变化情况,并对其原因进行了分析. Traditional researchs on Internet pricing often employ normative methods under the assumption of completely rational decision-makers. However, it is difficult for both Internet service providers (ISP) and cus- tomers to make rational decisions because of the incomplete information and bounded cognitive abilities in the real world. Considering the bounded rationality by employing the retention rate, this paper constructed conges- tion pricing policies for Internet services with customer impatience under both social welfare maximization and ISP's revenue maximization using uncooperative game, respectively. The effects of the two different pricing policies on ISP's revenues were analyzed. Numerical examples were performed to show the changes of ISP's revenue differences and pricing strategies, respectively.
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期607-616,共10页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71001031) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20100111120015) 高等学校优秀青年人才基金资助项目(2009SQRZ011)
关键词 拥塞定价 用户忍耐 服务质量 保留率 博弈 congestion pricing customer impatience quality of service (QoS) retention rate game
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1CNNIC.第28次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R].2011,http://www.cnnic.net.cn.
  • 2Akarnai. The State of the Internet Report[R]. 2011, 2nd Quarter, http://www.akamai.com/stateoftheinternet.
  • 3Dasilva L A. Pricing for QoS enabled networks: A survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys, 2000, 3(2): 2-8.
  • 4Wu Y, Hande P H, Kim H, et al. QoS-revenue tradeoff with time-constrained ISP pricing[C]// 18th International Workshop on Quality of Service. Beijing: IEEE Press, 2010: 1-9.
  • 5Fulp E W, Reeves D S. QoS rewards and risks: A multi-market approach to resource allocation[J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2000, 1815: 945-956.
  • 6Simon H A. A behavioral model of rational choice[J[. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, 69(1): 99-118.
  • 7Simon H A. Rational decision making in business organizations[J]. American Economic Review, 1979, 69(4): 493-513.
  • 8Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases[J]. Science, 1974, 185(4157): 1124-1131.
  • 9Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[J]. Science, 1981, 211 (4481): 453-458.
  • 10Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advance in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部