期刊文献+

死亡焦虑量表的跨文化调适 被引量:33

Study on the cross- cultural adjustment and application of the Death Anxiety Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的立足本土,对死亡焦虑量表(T-OAS)进行跨文化调适形成中文版量表。方法通过跨文化调适和正式调查2个阶段,修订成中文版死亡焦虑量表,对450名大学生及50名临终关怀医务工作者进行调查,7~10d后重测其中的60名大学生。对数据进行信度、效度分析。结果中文版T—DAS语言通俗易懂,绝大多数受调查者能在5—10min完成,量表有效回收率97.4%。与单条目量表得分做相关分析得出效标效度r=0.516;通过结构方程模型结构效度分析,发现模型拟合程度较好。对15个条目进行探索性因子分析,结果推选出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为46.13%。内部一致性Cronbach’α系数仪值为0.71;总量表2次测量的相关系数为0.831。结论中文版T-DAS具有较好的效度和信度,为死亡焦虑的评价提供了一个有效的工具。 Objective To study on the cross- cultural adjustment and application of the Death Anxiety Scale based on the national culture and establish the Chinese version of this scale. Methods Through cross- cultural adaptation and formal investigation, the Chinese version of Death Anxiety Scale was established. A cross- sectional study was conducted among 450 medical college students and 50 hospice workers with multiple diagnoses to validate the Chinese version of the Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (T- DAS), after 7 to 10 days, 60 of them were retested. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (T- DAS)were evaluated according to the data. Results The Chinese version of the Tem- pier's Death Anxiety Scale(T- DAS)was easy to understand. Most respondents finished the whole scale in 5 tol0 minutes, and the effective recover rate of the scale was 97.4%. The correlation between the T- DAS and the single item test for the death anxiety was 0.516. Structural equation models and factor analysis dis- played good construction of the T- DAS. The internal consistency reliability evaluated by Cronbach'ot was 0.71 for the whole 15 items. The retest reliability was 0.831. Conclusions Based on the analysis, the Chi- nese version of the T- DAS has good reliability and validity, and should be a good instrument for the evaluation of the death anxiety.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2012年第31期53-57,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 死亡焦虑 跨文化调适 量表 效度 信度 Death anxiety Cross- cultural adaptation Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Anise MS, Catherine SK,Timothy CY. Death anxiety among Chinese elderly people in HongKong.Journal of Aging and Health,2002,14 (1):42.
  • 2Neimeyer RA,Mose RP, Wittkowski J. Assessing attitudes toward dying and death.Journal of Death and Dying, 2003,47 : 45-46.
  • 3Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Recommendations for the cross-cuhural adaptation of health status measures. Washington: American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Institute of Work and Health, 2002: 289.
  • 4Beaton DE,Bombardier C,Guillemin F,et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 2000,25(24) :3186.
  • 5Ahmed M,Abdel-Khalek. Single-versus multi-item scales in mea- suring death anxiety. Death Studies, 1998,29:763-772.
  • 6Templer DI. The construction and validation of a death anxiety scale. Journal of General Psychology, 1970,82:165-177.
  • 7Beshai JA , Naboulsi MA. Existential perspectives on death anxiety. Psychological Reports, 2004, 95 : 507 -513.
  • 8Templer DI, Abdelwahid A, Ghenaim AL-Fayez, et al.Construction of a Death Anxiety Scale-Extended. OMEGA, 2006,53 (3) : 209 -226.
  • 9Beshai JA,Naboulsi MA. Existential perspectives on death anxiety. Psychological Reports, 2004,95 : 507-513.
  • 10Parons T,Lidz V. Death in American society. New York: Science House, 1967 : 133-170.

同被引文献377

引证文献33

二级引证文献172

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部