期刊文献+

不完全信息下的反倾销审计政策优化分析 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文提出以审计加惩罚的组合策略来阻止反倾销申请企业的成本谎报行为,通过分析不完全信息下反倾销申请企业与贸易主管当局的信号博弈,得出:当惩罚效应起主导作用时,贸易主管当局应采取高惩罚力度和低审查概率的组合策略,以阻止成本谎报;当调查效应起主导作用时,贸易主管当局应采取低惩罚力度和高审查概率的组合策略。
作者 刘锦芳
出处 《经济科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期55-68,共14页 Economic Science
基金 2012年国家自然科学基金资助项目:"我国企业应对反倾销的会计信息证据效力保障机制研究(71272068)" 湖南省社会科学基金项目"风险管理视角下包装企业内部控制研究(11JD22)"的相关研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1刘爱东,刘锦芳.反倾销税率优化的信号博弈分析[J].系统工程,2009,27(3):53-57. 被引量:4
  • 2刘锦芳.利用审计师“囚徒困境”阻止合谋的博弈分析[J].经济科学,2009(4):95-103. 被引量:3
  • 3漆鑫,朱彤.不完全信息、反倾销威胁下的最优出口贸易政策——以审计政策为信息甄别工具[J].国际经贸探索,2009,25(4):71-75. 被引量:3
  • 4Fischer, Ronald D.1992., "Endogenous Probability of Protection and Firm Behavior"[J], Joumal of International Economics(32).
  • 5Leidy, Michael P, and Bernard Hoekman. 1991. "Spurious Injury as Indirect Rent-seeking: Free Trade Under the Prospect of Protection"[J], Economics and Politics (3),.
  • 6Leidy, Michael P.. 1994. "Quid Pro Quo Restraint and Spurious Injury: Subsidies and the Prospect of CVDs[J], In Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System, Edited by Alan Deardorff and Robert Ster. Ann Arbor. MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  • 7Philippe Kohler and Michael O. Moore.2009. Injury-Based Protection with Auditing under Imperfect Information[J], Southern Economic Journal(68).
  • 8Prusa, T homas.1994. Pricing Behavior in the Presence of An Antidumping Law[J], Journal of Economic Integration(2).
  • 9X. Matschke, A. SchOtner.2009. Antidumping as Strategic Trade Policy Under Asymmetric Information[J], CESIFO Working Paper, No 2536.

二级参考文献32

共引文献6

同被引文献15

  • 1钟根元,周斌,许源.不完全信息动态博弈下反倾销税率优化模型[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006,38(1):104-106. 被引量:11
  • 2彭立志,王领,子璇(校对).不完全信息、反倾销威胁与最优出口贸易政策[J].经济研究,2006,41(6):70-78. 被引量:14
  • 3Shih-Jye Wu,Yang-Ming Chang,Hung-Yi Chen.Antidumping duties and price undertakings: A welfare analysis[J].International Review of Economics and Finance.2013
  • 4Kohler p, Moore M 0. Injury-Based Protection with Auditing under Imperfect Information [J]. Southern Economic Journal, 2001, 68 (1) : 42 -59.
  • 5Matschke X, Schttner A. Antidumping as Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information [J]. Southern Economic Journal, 2013 , 80 (1) : 81 -105.
  • 6Grossman G, Helpman E. Protection for Sale [ J]. American Economic Review, 1994,84: 833 - 850.
  • 7Goldberg P, Maggi G. Protection for Sale : An Empirical Investigation [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1999,89: 1135 - 1155.
  • 8Kroszner R, Stratman T. What Drives Deregulation? Economics and politics of the Relaxation of Bank Branching Restrictions [ J]. Quarterly Journalof Economics, 1999,114: 1437 -1467.
  • 9Gawande K,Krishna P, Olarreaga M. Lobbying Competition over Trade Policy [R]. NBER Working Paper, 2005 , Vol. 11371.
  • 10Bombardini M,Trebbi F. Competition and Political Organization: Together or Alone in Lobbying for Trade Policy? [ J]. Journal of International Eco-nomics, 2012,87: 18 -26.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部