期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

柏拉图《斐多篇》中的“跟有(μετεχειν)”与“跟名(επονομáξειν)” 被引量：2

Metechein and Eponomazein in Plato's Phaedo
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文沿语义学进路考察了柏拉图中期对话《斐多篇》的存有论的内在结构,为西方学界争论已久的"第三人论证"所包含的"自谓述"假设提供了理论支持,揭示了柏拉图理念论中蕴含的描述与命名、意义与指称和专名与通名的混淆,澄清了Being概念中"同一性"、"有"和"谓述系词"的内在意义关联与主从关系。 This is a semantic approach to Plato's ontological structure in Phaedo.The author not only confirms the Self-Predication Assumption included in the Third Man Argument,but also shows the confusion between describing and naming,meaning and reference,proper name and general name in plato's theory of Forms,finally,we get a clear idea of the inner relationship among the three meaning of being—identity,having and copula in Plato.
作者 宋继杰
机构地区 清华大学哲学系
出处 《世界哲学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期44-61,160,共18页 World Philosophy
关键词 跟有 跟名 自谓述 柏拉图 斐多 弗赖斯托斯
分类号 B502 [哲学宗教—外国哲学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1Viastos, G. , "The Third Man Argument in the ' Parmenides' ", The Philosophical Review, 1954, in R. Allen ed. Studies in Plato's Metaphysics (SPM), Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1965.
  • 2Moravcsik, J. M. E. , "The 'Third Man' Argument and Plato's Theory of Forms", Phronesis, 1963, 8, pp. 50 -62.
  • 3Heinaman, R. , "Self-Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues", Phronesis 34, 1989, pp. 56 -79.
  • 4Malcolm, J. , Plato on the Self-Predication of Forms ~ Early and Middle Dialogues, 1991, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 5Cherniss, H. , Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy, Baltimore: 1944.
  • 6"The Relation of the Timaeuys to Plato's Later Dialogues. " The American Journal of philology 78, 1957, pp. 225 - 266, SPM, pp. 339 - 378.
  • 7Alien, R.E. , "Participation and Predication in Plato's Middle Dialogues," Philosophical Review 69, 1960, pp. 147-164, SPM, pp. 43-60.
  • 8"Forms and Standards", Philosophical Quarterly9, 1959, pp. 164 - 167.
  • 9Plato's Parmenides, University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
  • 10Bestor, T. , " Common Properties and Eponymy in Plato", Philosophical Quarterly 28, 1978, pp. 189 - 207.

同被引文献12

  • 1Hermann, F.-G. , Words and Ideas." The Roots of Plato's Philosophy , TheClassical Press of Wales, 2007, pp. 95 ~ 106, p. 109, p. 126.
  • 2A.E. Taylor, "The Word inpre-Platonic Literature" , Varia Socratica, J. Parker & co. , 1911, pp. 184 ~ 186, p. 186, pp. 190 ~ 201, p. 212, pp.216 ~ 217, p. 221, p. 250, pp. 247 ~ 2480.
  • 3Hermann, F.-G. , Words and Ideas." The Roots of Plato's Philosophy , TheClassical Press of Wales, 2007, 109 - 110, p. 113.
  • 4J. E. Raven, Pythagoreans andEleatics, Cambridge University Press, 1948o.
  • 5C. C. W. Taylor, "Nomos and Phusis in Democritus and Plato", Social Philosophy and Policy, 24, 2007, pp. 1 ~ 20.
  • 6Heidegger, The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Albert Hofstadter, trans. , Indiana University Press, 1988, pp. 106 - 107.
  • 7H.C. Baldry, "Plato's 'TechnicalTerms' " , The Classical Quarterly , 31, 1937, pp. 141 ~ 145.
  • 8C. M. Gillespie, "The Use of in Hippocrates" , The Classical Quarterly, 6, 1912, pp 202 ~ 203.
  • 9D. Ross, Plato's Theory ofldeas, Clarendon Press, 1951, p. 14, pp. 14 - 15, p. 15.
  • 10Plato, Gorgias, A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by E. R. Dodds, Clarendon Press, 1959, p. 328.

二级引证文献3

世界哲学
2012年 第6期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部