摘要
甲骨卜辞中地支单用纪日比较普遍,但囿于当时的材料,不少学者误认为甲骨卜辞中"地支"不能单独使用来纪日,或认为地支纪日比较后起。对商代甲骨卜辞中的地支纪日现象,黄天树、常玉芝、甘露等先生曾做过很好的梳理和补充,但仍有遗漏。该文依据作者完成的商代卜辞时间数据库对遗漏加以补充,且全面整理确认。
It is a common phenomenon that the days were recorded by the Earthly branches in the oracle- bone inecHptlons, but some re- searchers have comidezed that the Earthly branches can not have been used to record the days in the oracle- bone inscriptions or the days can only be recorded lately. In fact, it is the confined materials that lead to these opinions. Some scholars have done many woxks to ammge the materials which can disclose the days can be recored by the Earthly branches alone in the oracle- bone, but sere materials failed, so this paper will supplement the materials based on the latest research, and ascertain them based on the book robbing.
出处
《广东石油化工学院学报》
2012年第5期91-94,共4页
Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology
基金
教育部人文社科西部和边疆地区青年基金项目"甲骨卜辞量范畴研究"(10XJC740001)
重庆市社会科学规划项目"商代甲金文量范畴研究"(2010QNWX22)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金重点项目"商代甲金文时间表达式研究"(swu1109006)
西南大学博士基金项目"殷商至战国出土文献时间范畴研究"(swu 11315)
关键词
甲骨卜辞
地支
纪日
the oracle- bone inscriptions
the Earthly branches
record the days
book rubbing