摘要
通过对比分析国内外在"请求"、"道歉"和"拒绝"言语行为的过渡语特征和发展特点的实证研究,发现国内的研究相对于国外的研究存在一定差距。主要体现在实证研究步骤的完整性上,国内绝大部分报告在提出研究问题或假设、描述文献、选择研究方案、实施数据收集、分析和讨论数据结果等步骤上都有不同程度的缺失。
After a contrastive review of the Chinese and foreign scholars' empirical researches on the interlanguage characteristics and changes of the speech acts "request","apology" and "refusal",the author comes to the conclusion that the Chinese scholars' researches are far behind those of their foreign counterparts'.Chinese scholars' researches are not systematic,and many reports fail to take into account all steps such as putting forward research questions or hypotheses,reviewing literature,deciding research plan,collecting data,analyzing data and describing data analysis result.
出处
《无锡商业职业技术学院学报》
2012年第5期103-106,共4页
Journal of Wuxi Vocational Institute of Commerce
基金
广西人文社会科学发展研究中心教授培育项目(py2010003)
广西十二五教育科学规划项目(2011ZY002)