期刊文献+

转移性肝癌射频消融治疗的超声造影评价 被引量:5

Evaluation of short term therapeutic response of radiofrequency ablation of metastatic liver cancer with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声造影评价转移性肝癌射频消融治疗的近期消融效果的价值。方法回顾性分析转移性肝癌射频消融治疗患者43例(56个病灶)的近期随访资料,包括病灶的超声造影与增强CT检查、实验室检查和临床表现等,比较分析超声造影与增强CT检查所见及对肿瘤灭活程度的判断情况。结果超声造影显示56个病灶中47个造影灌注各期均无增强,9个病灶边缘少部分组织在动脉期不规则增强,内部大部分组织在各期均无增强;增强CT显示56个病灶中49个造影灌注各期均无增强,7个病灶边缘少部分组织在动脉期不规则增强,内部大部分组织在各期均无增强。超声造影与增强CT对转移性肝癌射频消融治疗后病灶灭活程度比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.788);对灭活效果的判定具有较高的一致性(K=0.635,P<0.001)。结论超声造影可以较准确检查转移性肝癌射频消融的肿瘤灭活范围和发现残留病灶,具有与增强CT评价肝癌射频消融治疗近期疗效的相似效果。 Objective To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in assessing the short term therapeutic response of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in patients with metastatic liver cancer.Methods Archives of 43 patients with metastatic liver cancer(56 lesions) undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation were reviewed retrospectively,including contrast-enhanced sonography,contrast-enhanced computed tomography,laboratory tests and clinical manifestation.Findings and detection of residual tumor in contrast-enhanced sonography,contrast-enhanced computed tomography were studied.Results Of the 56 lesions on contrast-enhanced sonography,47 lesions did not show enhancement,9 lesions showed marginal heterogeneous enhancement at arterial phase but absent enhancement in the central part.Of the 56 lesions on contrast-enhanced computed tomography,49 lesions did not show enhancement,7 lesions showed marginal heterogeneous enhancement at arterial phase and absent enhancement in the central part.There was no significant difference between the contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the assessment of the short term therapeutic response of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in patients with metastatic liver cancer(P=0.788),and the agreement of those between the two modalities was good(K=0.635,P〈0.001).Conclusion Contrast-enhanced sonography has almost equivalent to that of contrast-enhanced CT in evaluating the short term therapeutic response of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in patients with metastatic liver cancer.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第30期3160-3161,F0002,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 肝肿瘤 肿瘤转移 导管消融术 超声检查 多普勒 彩色 liver neoplasms neoplasm metastasis catheter ablation ultrasonography doppler color
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献45

共引文献98

同被引文献91

  • 1Georgios Tsoulfas,Manousos Georgios Pramateftakis,Ioannis Kanellos.Surgical treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2011,3(1):1-9. 被引量:7
  • 2Bonekamp S, Halappa VG, Geschwind JF, et al. Unreseetable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: MR Imaging after Intraarterial Therapy. Part I|. Response Stratification Using Volumetric Functional Criteria after Intraarterial Therapy [ J ]. Radiology, 2013,268 ( 2 ) :431-439.
  • 3FeMeyer M, Hohenberger P, Apfaltrer P,et al. CT-based response as- sessment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: dual energy CT provides a more predictive imaging bionmrker of clinical benefit than RECIST or Choicriteria[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013,82(6) :923-928.
  • 4Shen ZY, Shen E, Zhang JZ, et al. Effects of low-frequency ultra- sound and microbubbles on angiogenesis-associated proteins in sub- cutaneous tumors of nude mice [J] Oncol Rep, 2013,30 ( 2 ) : 842-50.
  • 5Frampas E, Lassau N, Zappa M, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: early evaluation of response to targeted therapy and prognostic value of perfusion CT and dynamic contrast enhanced-ul- trasound [ J ]. Eur J Radiol, 2013 ,82 (5) :205-211.
  • 6AMaksimovie O, Schraml C, Hartmann IT, et al. Evaluation of re- sponse in malignant tumors treated with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib: a multitechnique imaging assessment [J]. JR Am J Roentgenol, 2010,194(1) :5-14.
  • 7Moschouris H, Malagari K, Gkoutzios P, et al. Intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with the antiangiogenic agent sorafenib. Evaluation with unenhanced and contrast-en- hanced uhrasonography [ J ]. Med Ultrason, 2012,14 (2) : 87-94.
  • 8Quaia E. Bertolotto M. Forgacs B. et al. Detection of liver metastases by pulse inversion harmonic imaging during Levovist late phase: comparison with conventional ultrasound and helical CT in 160 patients [J] . Eur Radiol. 2003. 13 (3) : 475-483.
  • 9Claudon M. Dietrich CF. Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver-update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB. AIUM. ASUM. FLAUS and ICUS . Ultrasound Med Biol.2013. 39(2): 187-210.
  • 10Claudon M. Cosgrove D. Albrecht T. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-update 200S D]. Ultraschall Med, 200S, 29 (1) : 28-44.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部