期刊文献+

刑事证据制度:从逻辑规则向程序规则的演进——以非法证据排除制度为切入点的分析

Criminal Evidence Law: Evolution from a System of Logical Deduction Rules to a System of Procedural Rules —by Analysis of Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以非法证据排除制度为样本,对2012年刑事诉讼法修改后证据制度的发展和变革作了梳理,讨论了为规范司法机关诉讼活动,保障公民基本权利,在充分考虑中外法律传统、诉讼模式等方面差异,充分考虑国情并借鉴外国先进经验的基础上确立非法证据排除制度时的考量因素。非法证据排除制度的建立,体现了我国刑事证据制度从以逻辑推演规则为基础的制度体系向以价值考量为依据的程序规则体系的演进。不仅非法证据排除制度如此,关于证据概念、举证责任、证人保护、证人出庭等的修改也体现了这一特色。由此带来的观念变化也为我国确立更加健全的程序规则起到了促进作用。 Taking the exclusionary rule of Illegally obtained evidence as the sample,this article studied the development and changes of the evidence system after the 2012 amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure Law and discussed about the issues regarding the establishment of exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence.These issues involve regulating the judicial proceedings,protecting the fundamental rights of citizens,taking into account of the Sino-foreign differences in legal traditions,litigation modes,Chinese national conditions and foreign advanced experiences.The establishment of exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence reflects Chinese system of criminal evidence has evolved from an institutional system based on the logical deduction rules to a system of procedural rules based on value consideration.Not only the exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence reflects this feature,but also the concept of evidence,the burden of proof,the witness protection,the witnesses in court and other modifications do have such feature.The resulting change of concepts will also play a catalytic role for China to establish a more robust system of procedural rules.
作者 黄永
出处 《证据科学》 CSSCI 2012年第4期414-420,共7页 Evidence Science
关键词 非法证据排除 逻辑规则 法律真实 程序正义 保障人权 Exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence Logical deduction rules Legal truth Procedural justice Protection of human rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

  • 1[美]理查德·A·波斯纳.对刑事诉讼中控方非法行为的过度制裁[A].陈虎译.诉讼法学研究:十二[C].北京:中国检察出版社,2007.
  • 2[美]艾玛.《宪法与刑事诉讼》[M].房保国译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006.
  • 3Myron W. Orfield. The Exclusinary Rule and Deterrence : An Empirical Study of Chicago Narcotics Officers [ J ]. University of Chicago Law Review, 1987, vol. 54.
  • 4[英]弗里德里希·冯·哈耶克.《哈耶克文选》[M].冯克利译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007.
  • 52003年9月,浙江省公安厅颁布.《浙江公安民警刑讯逼供行为的处理办法》.
  • 6P. CHEVIGNY, POLICEPOWERI 87-88 (1969).
  • 7J. SKOLNICK, JUSTICEWTTHOUTTRIAL: LAW ENFORCEMENT IN DEMOCRATICSOCIETY214 - 15 (1966).
  • 8Comment, Effect of Mapp v. Ohio on Police Search -and -Seizure Practices in Narcotics Cares, 4 C -LUM. J. L. &Sec. PROB. 87, 95 (1968).
  • 9[美]斯特龙等编.《麦考密克论证据》,汤维建等译,中国政法大学出版社,2004年版,第316页.
  • 10约翰·卡普兰,陈虎(译).非法证据排除规则的限度[J].刑事法评论,2008(1):257-277. 被引量:9

共引文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部